Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RPI Engineers 2017-2018

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: RPI Engineers 2017-2018

    sigpic

    Let's Go 'Tute!

    Maxed out at 2,147,483,647 at 10:00 AM EDT 9/17/07.

    2012 Poser Of The Year

    Comment


    • Re: RPI Engineers 2017-2018


      sigpic

      Let's Go 'Tute!

      Maxed out at 2,147,483,647 at 10:00 AM EDT 9/17/07.

      2012 Poser Of The Year

      Comment


      • Re: RPI Engineers 2017-2018




        Edit: It appears to actually be Taylor-Walters.
        She has also played in 2 games for Oakville's Junior team.
        Last edited by Ralph Baer; 01-08-2018, 11:47 AM.
        sigpic

        Let's Go 'Tute!

        Maxed out at 2,147,483,647 at 10:00 AM EDT 9/17/07.

        2012 Poser Of The Year

        Comment


        • Re: RPI Engineers 2017-2018

          We have to get more than one point out of Harvard and Dartmouth at home. We're still in a decent position going forward, but it's going to be a tightrope walk. This week, we head to the North Country, where we'll be lucky to pick up a point.

          RPI KRACH (RRWP): 59.46 (0.3942)

          MCTs (Mean/Median/Mode/Range):
          Points - 18.13 / 18 / 18 / 10 - 31
          Rank - 7.97 / 8 / 8 / 2 - 12
          Playoffs - 78.1%
          Most likely opponent - at Colgate (41.8%)

          Conference Rankings:
          1. Colgate
          2. Clarkson
          3. Cornell
          4. SLU
            —————
          5. Quinnipiac
          6. Harvard
          7. Princeton
          8. RPI
            —————
            —————
          9. Yale
          10. Union
          11. Dartmouth
          12. Brown


          RPI Points vs. Position
          Code:
             |     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9    10    11    12
          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          10 |                                                   0.0   0.0   0.1   0.0
          11 |                                                   0.0   0.1   0.2   0.0
          12 |                                             0.0   0.1   0.6   0.4   0.0
          13 |                                             0.1   0.7   1.2   0.3   0.0
          14 |                                             0.8   2.3   1.7   0.2     
          15 |                                       0.0   2.8   3.6   1.3   0.0     
          16 |                                       0.1   7.0   3.9   0.6   0.0     
          17 |                                 0.0   0.4  10.2   2.6   0.2   0.0     
          18 |                                 0.0   1.4  12.1   1.3   0.0           
          19 |                           0.0   0.1   3.1   9.8   0.4   0.0           
          20 |                           0.0   0.4   4.5   6.3   0.1   0.0           
          21 |                           0.0   0.9   4.4   2.7   0.0                 
          22 |                     0.0   0.0   1.4   3.1   0.8   0.0                 
          23 |                     0.0   0.1   1.3   1.4   0.2                       
          24 |                     0.0   0.2   0.9   0.4   0.0                       
          25 |               0.0   0.0   0.2   0.4   0.1   0.0                       
          26 |               0.0   0.0   0.1   0.1   0.0                             
          27 |               0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                             
          28 |               0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                   
          29 |               0.0   0.0   0.0                                         
          30 |         0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                         
          31 |               0.0                                                     
          32 |                                                                       
          33 |                                                                       
          34 |
          RPI Pep Band
          GO GO GO YOU RED RED RED!!! and I guess Yale?
          🎶🎺🎺🎺 LET'S GO BLUES!

          2017-2018 RPI Pick to Click – Champion
          2013-2016 RPI Pick to Click – Back-to-Back-to-Back Runner-Up
          2014-15, 2018-19 ECAC Pick the Standings – Last Place

          Comment


          • Re: RPI Engineers 2017-2018

            Should not have lost to Harvard or Dartmouth. OH well easy to say not to do.

            Comment


            • Re: RPI Engineers 2017-2018

              Originally posted by giwan View Post
              Should not have lost to Harvard or Dartmouth. OH well easy to say not to do.
              I think the "expected" outcome was 2-3 points, so only getting the 1 was a not insignificant stepback.
              RPI Pep Band
              GO GO GO YOU RED RED RED!!! and I guess Yale?
              🎶🎺🎺🎺 LET'S GO BLUES!

              2017-2018 RPI Pick to Click – Champion
              2013-2016 RPI Pick to Click – Back-to-Back-to-Back Runner-Up
              2014-15, 2018-19 ECAC Pick the Standings – Last Place

              Comment


              • Re: RPI Engineers 2017-2018

                No point weekend *sigh sigh sighsighsigh*. Not that it wasn't expected, but getting nothing out of a weekend in the North Country except for moral victories kind of sucks. Next, we get to travel to Central NY and probably achieve the same results. Whoopee. Our playoff chances dropped by 10%, but really we still just need to aim to hit 16-18 points at minimum. If we look at our upcoming schedule, we can get by with a sweep against Union and a win against Dartmouth. Princeton, Quinnipiac, and Harvard will be stretches, but we will probably need to take at least one of them to be safe.

                RPI KRACH (RRWP): 56.39 (0.3839)

                MCTs (Mean/Median/Mode/Range):
                Points - 17.21 / 17 / 18 / 10 - 29
                Rank - 8.25 / 8 / 8 / 3 - 12
                Playoffs - 68.1%
                Most likely opponent - at Colgate (39.8%)

                Conference Rankings:
                1. Colgate
                2. Clarkson
                3. Cornell
                4. SLU
                  —————
                5. Quinnipiac
                6. Princeton
                7. Harvard
                8. RPI
                  —————
                  —————
                9. Yale
                10. Union
                11. Dartmouth
                12. Brown


                RPI Points vs. Position
                Code:
                   |     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9    10    11    12
                ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                10 |                                                         0.0   0.1   0.0
                11 |                                                   0.0   0.2   0.3   0.0
                12 |                                             0.0   0.2   1.2   0.6   0.0
                13 |                                             0.1   1.0   2.2   0.3      
                14 |                                             1.2   3.7   2.8   0.1      
                15 |                                       0.0   3.7   5.3   1.7   0.0      
                16 |                                       0.0   8.7   5.7   0.7   0.0      
                17 |                                 0.0   0.2  11.4   3.5   0.2            
                18 |                                 0.0   1.0  12.6   1.6   0.0            
                19 |                           0.0   0.1   2.2   8.9   0.5   0.0            
                20 |                           0.0   0.5   3.1   4.8   0.1                  
                21 |                           0.0   0.9   2.4   1.6   0.0                  
                22 |                     0.0   0.1   1.1   1.2   0.3   0.0                  
                23 |                     0.0   0.1   0.7   0.3   0.0                        
                24 |                     0.0   0.1   0.3   0.0   0.0                        
                25 |                     0.0   0.1   0.1   0.0                              
                26 |               0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                    
                27 |               0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                    
                28 |               0.0   0.0   0.0                                          
                29 |               0.0   0.0                                                
                30 |
                RPI Pep Band
                GO GO GO YOU RED RED RED!!! and I guess Yale?
                🎶🎺🎺🎺 LET'S GO BLUES!

                2017-2018 RPI Pick to Click – Champion
                2013-2016 RPI Pick to Click – Back-to-Back-to-Back Runner-Up
                2014-15, 2018-19 ECAC Pick the Standings – Last Place

                Comment


                • Re: RPI Engineers 2017-2018

                  First game so close, were easily on par. Injuries have taken their toll you can see it in the 3rd period.

                  Comment


                  • Re: RPI Engineers 2017-2018

                    Originally posted by giwan View Post
                    First game so close, were easily on par. Injuries have taken their toll you can see it in the 3rd period.
                    Good effort against Clarkson but the SLU game was not encouraging. Hemmed in our own end for most of the game, partly because SLU forechecks well but we made huge number of unforced errors coming out of our own end. Disappointing to see that RPI, once again, is in a position of defining its success as squeaking into the playoffs. But, it is way too early to judge a new coach, so I'm still hopeful.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by hab View Post
                      Good effort against Clarkson but the SLU game was not encouraging. Hemmed in our own end for most of the game, partly because SLU forechecks well but we made huge number of unforced errors coming out of our own end. Disappointing to see that RPI, once again, is in a position of defining its success as squeaking into the playoffs. But, it is way too early to judge a new coach, so I'm still hopeful.
                      Your last sentence is the key. It is far too early to judge or be disappointed. You have to wait til he has a chance to clean house and bring in a team full of his own recruits first. There's still a lot of dead weight on this team...players that probably would have been better suited for high-end D3 programs because they are just too slow to play D1 hockey, but how can ya pass up an RPI education when the former coach recruits you?! You can't, so none of this is the fault of the current players. The blame rests fully on the shoulders of the previous head coach.

                      Comment


                      • Re: RPI Engineers 2017-2018

                        Originally posted by shelfit View Post
                        Your last sentence is the key. It is far too early to judge or be disappointed. You have to wait til he has a chance to clean house and bring in a team full of his own recruits first. There's still a lot of dead weight on this team...players that probably would have been better suited for high-end D3 programs because they are just too slow to play D1 hockey, but how can ya pass up an RPI education when the former coach recruits you?! You can't, so none of this is the fault of the current players. The blame rests fully on the shoulders of the previous head coach.
                        As much as I agree far to early to judge I do not believe be needs to have all HIS recruits in place to win.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by giwan View Post
                          As much as I agree far to early to judge I do not believe be needs to have all HIS recruits in place to win.
                          But he does need more of his own recruits (defined as more than half the team of his own recruits vs the former coach's players) to win MORE OFTEN. Still too much dead weight and slow feet on this team from the previous coach.
                          Last edited by shelfit; 01-17-2018, 08:49 PM.

                          Comment


                          • Re: RPI Engineers 2017-2018

                            Originally posted by shelfit View Post
                            But he does need more of his own recruits (defined as more than half the team of his own recruits vs the former coach's players) to win MORE OFTEN. Still too much dead weight and slow feet on this team from the previous coach.
                            I agree that there are players on the roster who could be classified as dead weight, but if they are recruited walkons or only receiving small partial scholarships, they could be making contribution equivalent to their cost. With 18 scholarships available, not everyone is getting a full ride.

                            Also even many of the better teams typically seem to play mainly two lines.

                            Do coach Vines' recruits in the pipeline look to be an improvement to you?
                            sigpic

                            Let's Go 'Tute!

                            Maxed out at 2,147,483,647 at 10:00 AM EDT 9/17/07.

                            2012 Poser Of The Year

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Ralph Baer View Post
                              I agree that there are players on the roster who could be classified as dead weight, but if they are recruited walkons or only receiving small partial scholarships, they could be making contribution equivalent to their cost. With 18 scholarships available, not everyone is getting a full ride.

                              Also even many of the better teams typically seem to play mainly two lines.

                              Do coach Vines' recruits in the pipeline look to be an improvement to you?
                              Predicting how well recruits will do once they get to the next level is a very hard thing to do accurately. Sometimes players that look very good at the U19 level end up being very average once they reach D1. Does that mean they should have gone D3 instead? That's also a very hard question to answer. To accurately predict any of that while they're still playing U19 hockey is what differentiates good recruiting ability from average to poor recruiting ability. It's not uncommon for a good U19 player to not be coached well while playing at that level, which means she's not being properly prepared to play at the next level. Why? A lot of times the U19 coaches didn't necessarily achieve Great Heights in hockey themselves and so they don't know any better... they don't understand that a forward who is all about offense but not defense or a defenseman who wanders all over the ice without regard to team play because she's very offensively minded aren't players that are necessarily ready to play college hockey. You need to be more well-rounded, more of a two-way player to be successful at the next level. Just my opinion.

                              Comment


                              • And Yale moves 2 points ahead of RPI and into 8th place in the ECAC, dropping RPI into 9th place. Wrong direction.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X