Having said that...have a look at Aaron Rodgers of the Green Bay Packers helmet..I believe it utilizes the Seven technology or a reasonable facsimile.
Last edited by 5 4 Fighting; 10-09-2011 at 10:37 AM. Reason: spell chick
It often happens that what seems to be a logical improvement for safety is not the case. I've personally done testing of helmets and other safety items and gotten unexpected results, later to find the item was less safe.
If you go back 50 years, helmets were still being made of leather and covered only about half the head, with lots of gaps, and maybe these were just as good as today's best models? Exactly when did manufacturers stop improving their products?
Companies like Bauer continue to spend lots of time and money into the design of improved models, but I guess you're saying that buyers of their latest and best examples are pretty much just wasting their money? Which product would you choose, if it was for your own daughter?
I know it's just an ad, but the various links off this site are pretty interesting:
Minnesota Golden Gopher Hockey
Anybody interested in this topic should google Kevin Guskiewicz or Jason Mihalik. These guys have spent endless time researching the cause and effect of sports related concussions and in particular hockey. Jason spoke at a level IV clinic I was at a few years ago and he discussed the research that they have done. They are sponsored or work at the University of North Carolina and are part of the Matthew Gfeller Sport-Related traumatic brain injury research center. From what he discussed at the clinic it was clear to me that the quality of the helmet and the proper use and fit was key in reducing (not eliminating) these injuries. What was surprising to me was they found that mouth guards were not as effective as I had always been lead to believe. While they did not advocate not using mouth guards (more for dental reasons IIRC) they did stress the importance of using a “high quality” helmet (no specific brand endorsement) with the proper fit and discarding those helmets after a significant impact that led to a injury. One other interesting note included test fitting a helmet with wet hair to simulate the fit when the athlete was sweating.. I agree with one post that said helmets can not prevent concussions but I believe now that the quality of the helmet can play a part in preventing such an injury.
I was also an athletic trainer with a college hockey and football team so I am very aware of fit being important.
Leather helmets had no standard to meet. Do the companies do research sure, more then likely farm it out to a university as you read in that link. No data stating how much better or if it was statistically significant. Now if a company had CLEAR obvious data showing the benefits why would they not show it all? When I do competitive tests now and our company product beats the other then that test data, and report is available to the buyers of the product.
By the way I do have a daughter and pay attention to what she wears, how it fits and most important that she is physically in proper shape to play. I actually do neck resistance exercises with her and I do not mean weight lifting.
It is interesting to note (and I say this from direct observation of what has transpired in a Pro practice facility) that many pro teams have gone away from the "Hi-end" EPS type helmet and back to the older style helmets with the basic foam liner.
Last edited by Hux; 10-10-2011 at 10:36 PM.
Last edited by SlewFoot; 10-10-2011 at 11:03 PM.
Here's chapter 2...Peter Mansbridge again on tonight's "The National" giving more major and expensive airtime to the topic of head injuries in hockey. Check out the star studded panel...Cassie Campbell, Scotty Bowman, Ken Dryden and Elliot Friedman...
And then there's this video, again from tonight's "The National", which focuses more on head injuries that result from fighting. Seems like the NHL is less interested in the players' physical well being than they are in the league's collective revenue stream.
Last edited by 5 4 Fighting; 10-15-2011 at 10:12 AM. Reason: spell chick
That having been said a punch to the head is a punch to the head regardless of whether or not anyone thinks the recipient deserved it. They should have focused solely on that and ignored the peripheral issues or any circumstances that lead to the (any) fight. So, in that regard they did eventually make their point although in a circuitous and needlessly watered down fashion. Then again, maybe something was lost on me.
Last edited by Blackbeard; 10-15-2011 at 08:27 PM.
...and then there is this.
Interesting video! Unfortunately, there's also a lot of truth in what they have to say.
...coming from a fella that oughta know.
The most common injury in Women's Hockey? According to this article it is...
Obviously an extreme example as pertains to the college game, but an eye opener nonetheless when it comes to severity of potential trauma via contact to the head and concussions...creating a clear need for strict enforcement of rules aimed at eliminating dangerous infractions involving players heads...in the NCAA.
Translated -- Our financial analysts tell us that if we take steps to reduce fighting it could negatively effect our bottom line, and hey, enforcers are a dime a dozen.The NHL is not convinced that there is a link between hockey and CTE.
"There isn't a lot of data, and the experts who we talked to, who consult with us, think that it's way premature to be drawing any conclusions at this point," NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman said. "Because we're not sure that any, based on the data we have available, is valid."
"... And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;" -- Rudyard Kipling
I find some irony in the lyrics of the "State of Hockey" anthem...as it references fighting twice and of course the line "The day they try to take this game is the day the gloves come off".
BTW...the comments from Bettman I find ridiculous but not at all surprising. Not unlike his previous bogus claims that he's concerned with the effects of the NHL poaching many college hockey underclassmen and wanted to reach some type of arrangement to benefit NCAA division I hockey programs by some method of limiting that poaching, or attempting to regulate it in some way. Not much "iron" and small conviction in his statements on that front. His job and sole priority is the bottom line of the NHL so I believe you can disregard the credibility of some of his commentary on topics like CTE and the poaching issue. I understand Bettman does what he's paid to do...has to do.
Apologies for wandering over to the soapbox.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)