Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 67
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 66 67 template Next
  • #226
    Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

    Originally posted by The Rube View Post
    Depends on if the Dems can sort out the 50 candidates that have declared. Solidify from the Bern Bros, and some fragments of the wannabes, and the people that don't wanna go full AOC style, Dems have it in the bag. Cut out the big steps, to make small steps. Easy victory. Win small, THEN go big. Don't try to get it all in one shot.
    I will do what I can to help this happen, but I have no faith. I really did start thinking, about 6 months before the election, that Trump was going to win and win big. I suspect it will be close in 2020, but I don't know, man, I just think Trump wins reelection.

    Comment

    • #227
      Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

      Originally posted by duper View Post
      I will do what I can to help this happen, but I have no faith. I really did start thinking, about 6 months before the election, that Trump was going to win and win big. I suspect it will be close in 2020, but I don't know, man, I just think Trump wins reelection.
      I am still gonna say the Dems will have MN in the bag, despite last election's numbers. Just going by history, here.
      Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
      Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens

      Comment

      • #228
        Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

        Originally posted by The Rube View Post
        I am still gonna say the Dems will have MN in the bag, despite last election's numbers. Just going by history, here.
        I do like to hear that. Dems will get Colorado too, which to me is big, because when I first moved there in 1992, it was not a blue state. Of course, now that I'm in Alaska, well, Dems won't get Alaska, so there's 3 electoral votes to Trump. lol

        Comment

        • #229
          Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

          Originally posted by duper View Post
          I do like to hear that. Dems will get Colorado too, which to me is big, because when I first moved there in 1992, it was not a blue state. Of course, now that I'm in Alaska, well, Dems won't get Alaska, so there's 3 electoral votes to Trump. lol
          From 1932 onward, the state has primarily voted Democratic, last voting Republican during Nixon’s landslide victory in 1972. In 1984, Minnesotans gave homegrown Senator Mondale his only state in the lopsided loss to Ronald Reagan. While the Democratic winning streak grew to 11 straight elections in 2016, Hillary Clinton only beat Donald Trump by 1.5%.

          3 Rs since 1932, in presidential elections.
          Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
          Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens

          Comment

          • #230
            Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

            Originally posted by The Rube View Post
            From 1932 onward, the state has primarily voted Democratic, last voting Republican during Nixon’s landslide victory in 1972. In 1984, Minnesotans gave homegrown Senator Mondale his only state in the lopsided loss to Ronald Reagan. While the Democratic winning streak grew to 11 straight elections in 2016, Hillary Clinton only beat Donald Trump by 1.5%.

            3 Rs since 1932, in presidential elections.
            That might be fewer than my original home state of Illinois.

            Edit: geez - Illinois is grosser than I thought. They've gone Republican in the Presidential 12 times out of 22. Between that and the ridiculous wind, why the heck does anyone still live there?
            Last edited by duper; 05-08-2019, 11:50 PM.

            Comment

            • #231
              Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

              Originally posted by The Rube View Post
              Dems have it in the bag
              lol

              If there's one thing we should have learned by now is that the percentage of deplorables is much higher than any of us thought. Id put Trumps chances for re-election > 50%

              Comment

              • #232
                Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

                Originally posted by BassAle View Post
                lol

                If there's one thing we should have learned by now is that the percentage of deplorables is much higher than any of us thought. Id put Trumps chances for re-election > 50%
                That's a nice edit job on my post.
                Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
                Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens

                Comment

                • #233
                  Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

                  Originally posted by BassAle View Post
                  lol

                  If there's one thing we should have learned by now is that the percentage of deplorables is much higher than any of us thought. Id put Trumps chances for re-election > 50%
                  This. The tax return story should have had legs. It's already out of the News.
                  **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                  Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                  Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                  Comment

                  • #234
                    Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

                    You guys whine waaaayyy too much. Here's a magic solution for you. Its crazy, but it just might work!

                    If everybody who disagrees with Trump votes for the Democratic candidate next year, he and his fellow cult members will lose control of the govt. A far out concept I realize, but at the end of the day people get what they deserve to represent them. Its not like all of the "both sides are equally bad" crowd wasn't warned in full ahead of time.

                    Yes, voter suppression will be a problem in places like Georgia but in PA, WI, MI, and I believe NC Dems now control all statewide elected offices so no shenanigans with mysterious voting machine breakdowns on election night and last minute ID requirement changes this time. Now go out and earn it. 5 Senate seats are ripe for the picking in swing states: AZ, CO, ME, NC, IA. Don't cry, take them back.
                    Legally drunk???? If its "legal", what's the ------- problem?!? - George Carlin

                    Ever notice how everybody who drives slower than you is an idiot, and everybody who drives faster is a maniac? - George Carlin

                    "I've never seen so much reason and bullsh*t contained in ONE MAN."

                    Comment

                    • #235
                      Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

                      Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
                      This. The tax return story should have had legs. It's already out of the News.
                      Why would it have legs? There was a story about him not paying taxes for a decade in part because he managed to crash and burn a casino and screw up real estate a few years ago. It's like the NYT wants to run it every year. I get it. He's **** with money. Catch him actually laundering the money if you want legs on a story.
                      "I went over the facts in my head, and admired how much uglier the situation had just become. Over the years I've learned that ignorance is more than just bliss. It's freaking orgasmic ecstasy".- Harry Dresden, Blood Rites


                      Western Michigan Bronco Hockey- 2012 Mason Cup Champions

                      Comment

                      • #236
                        Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

                        Originally posted by bronconick View Post
                        Why would it have legs? There was a story about him not paying taxes for a decade in part because he managed to crash and burn a casino and screw up real estate a few years ago. It's like the NYT wants to run it every year. I get it. He's **** with money. Catch him actually laundering the money if you want legs on a story.
                        If a Democrat had not paid taxes for ten years you'd never get it out of the news.
                        **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                        Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                        Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                        Comment

                        • #237
                          Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

                          Originally posted by duper View Post
                          Excuse me while I go scrub myself clean after making that horrifying statement. I really hope I'm just being a pessimist, but by this time in 2016 it was clear to me that Trump was going to be the next President. I think he's getting a second term.
                          Unless the next recession begins within the next 12 months, I tend to believe you are correct.

                          Comment

                          • #238
                            Originally posted by FadeToBlack&Gold View Post
                            Unless the next recession begins within the next 12 months, I tend to believe you are correct.
                            High will be D fault and increase tD chances (from 99.999% to 99.9999999% )
                            a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.

                            Comment

                            • #239
                              Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

                              Incumbents have a good history but there are a few reasons to be a little more positive.

                              1. No matter who we run it will be a step up.

                              2. Dump isn't picking up any votes.

                              3. God murders thousands of Fox viewers every day.

                              4. An insurgency always has more energy than defense of the status quo.
                              Cornell University
                              National Champion 1967, 1970
                              ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                              Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                              Comment

                              • #240
                                Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

                                Did y’all see what tD recommended to ergodan?

                                Get ready for corrupt results and fraud charges
                                a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 66 67 template Next
                                Working...
                                X