Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 84

Thread: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    2

    NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    Congrats to the cities, arenas and host for your selection as sites for the 2020 & 2021 regionals

    Could not agree more with the great story by Ben Feree: https://www.collegian.psu.edu/sports...d56bf5226.html

    Since we we were able to successfully expand the men's D-I tournament from 12 to 16 teams, I have been campaigning for years that the NCAA Regionals MUST be at the sites of the highest four seeds. They have earned the right to host after playing 30+ games

    I agree with Ben that the regionals should be played at the site of the highest seeds. More Fans, More $$$, Great Atmosphere and only one three teams travel, meaning less expenses! There were tons of empty seats in the MHOK and MBBall early rounds and it looks terrible on TV. Also it is not fair to the fans who buy season tickets at the #1 seeds, only to have the most important game(s) of the year be hundreds of miles away. I would think we should get ESPN to chime in on this too, as they did the best job they could hiding all the empty seats.

    And maybe (just maybe) we could use this additional revenue to invest in adding even more teams to the NCAA tournament

    * #1 Seeds have earned the right to host after 30+ games
    * Most all NCAA sports (Except MBB) have high seeds host regionals.
    * Pro Sports - Only the Super Bowl is NOT at Highest seed
    * Not fair to #1 Seeds to be on neutral ice
    * Less Expenses (only three teams (not 4) travel)
    * More Fans, Bands, Cheer, Ice Dancers
    * More Revenue
    * Better Atmposhere
    * Better for Season Ticket Holders of #1 Seed
    * Better for TV
    * Promote need to upgrade and/or replace older facilities on college ice hockey campuses

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    20904/13677/07677/07621
    Posts
    37,802

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    Just to be sure, there would be 4 regionals at the campus rinks of the top 4 seeds? And they'd be single elimination (3 games).

    All for it. But travel costs probably be higher.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    14,517

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    How do we know that every arena is capable of hosting 4 teams? And all these multi purpose facilities will keep that weekend available? Plus you would have very short notice for those schools who are hosting. While this will probably never happen, let's say one of the Alaska schools has a miraculous season (hey look at UMass)...they are going to host a regional? I don't think on campus sites is a bad idea. I just think it's more complicated than a lot of people think.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,808

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    If you can't host it moves on to the next seed. That's the school's problem to figure out.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    2,326

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    Quote Originally Posted by J.D. View Post
    How do we know that every arena is capable of hosting 4 teams? And all these multi purpose facilities will keep that weekend available? Plus you would have very short notice for those schools who are hosting. While this will probably never happen, let's say one of the Alaska schools has a miraculous season (hey look at UMass)...they are going to host a regional? I don't think on campus sites is a bad idea. I just think it's more complicated than a lot of people think.
    UMass has other events in their arena too like Harlem Globetrotters, Disney, Pup Patrol, etc that might have the building booked
    Yes I am the former member known as Zlax45

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Fitchburg, MA
    Posts
    4,254

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    Congrats to the cities, arenas and host for your selection as sites for the 2020 & 2021 regionals

    Could not agree more with the great story by Ben Feree: https://www.collegian.psu.edu/sports...d56bf5226.html

    Since we we were able to successfully expand the men's D-I tournament from 12 to 16 teams, I have been campaigning for years that the NCAA Regionals MUST be at the sites of the highest four seeds. They have earned the right to host after playing 30+ games

    I agree with Ben that the regionals should be played at the site of the highest seeds. More Fans, More $$$, Great Atmosphere and only one three teams travel, meaning less expenses! There were tons of empty seats in the MHOK and MBBall early rounds and it looks terrible on TV. Also it is not fair to the fans who buy season tickets at the #1 seeds, only to have the most important game(s) of the year be hundreds of miles away. I would think we should get ESPN to chime in on this too, as they did the best job they could hiding all the empty seats.

    And maybe (just maybe) we could use this additional revenue to invest in adding even more teams to the NCAA tournament

    * #1 Seeds have earned the right to host after 30+ games
    * Most all NCAA sports (Except MBB) have high seeds host regionals.
    * Pro Sports - Only the Super Bowl is NOT at Highest seed
    * Not fair to #1 Seeds to be on neutral ice
    * Less Expenses (only three teams (not 4) travel)
    * More Fans, Bands, Cheer, Ice Dancers
    * More Revenue
    * Better Atmposhere
    * Better for Season Ticket Holders of #1 Seed
    * Better for TV
    * Promote need to upgrade and/or replace older facilities on college ice hockey campuses
    So have you read any of the posts here over the last five years? I thought we pretty much established that
    1) the facilities are unlikely to be able to host these events on short notice
    2) not all campus sites can accommodate this event
    3) hockey isn't like "most" sports.
    4) all the other arguments that have been presented here ad nauseum...

    EDIT: Well, obviously not as it says "Posts: 1"
    Last edited by chickod; 04-22-2019 at 12:41 PM.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Marquette, MI
    Posts
    6,591
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    Congrats to the cities, arenas and host for your selection as sites for the 2020 & 2021 regionals

    Could not agree more with the great story by Ben Feree: https://www.collegian.psu.edu/sports...d56bf5226.html

    Since we we were able to successfully expand the men's D-I tournament from 12 to 16 teams, I have been campaigning for years that the NCAA Regionals MUST be at the sites of the highest four seeds. They have earned the right to host after playing 30+ games

    I agree with Ben that the regionals should be played at the site of the highest seeds. More Fans, More $$$, Great Atmosphere and only one three teams travel, meaning less expenses! There were tons of empty seats in the MHOK and MBBall early rounds and it looks terrible on TV. Also it is not fair to the fans who buy season tickets at the #1 seeds, only to have the most important game(s) of the year be hundreds of miles away. I would think we should get ESPN to chime in on this too, as they did the best job they could hiding all the empty seats.

    And maybe (just maybe) we could use this additional revenue to invest in adding even more teams to the NCAA tournament

    * #1 Seeds have earned the right to host after 30+ games
    * Most all NCAA sports (Except MBB) have high seeds host regionals.
    * Pro Sports - Only the Super Bowl is NOT at Highest seed
    * Not fair to #1 Seeds to be on neutral ice
    * Less Expenses (only three teams (not 4) travel)
    * More Fans, Bands, Cheer, Ice Dancers
    * More Revenue
    * Better Atmposhere
    * Better for Season Ticket Holders of #1 Seed
    * Better for TV
    * Promote need to upgrade and/or replace older facilities on college ice hockey campuses
    Do you now have to make every team in the country make certain to have available arena dates? Minnesota State had a concert booked for Regionals weekend this year. Many teams play in municipal arenas, where concerts are booked 6 months to a year in advance. If you have to block out 3 dates and pay for them, thatís a pretty expensive risk a school has to take.

  8. #8
    cetihcra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Denver, Colorado -- VT awhile back
    Posts
    2,582

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    Quote Originally Posted by davyd83 View Post
    Do you now have to make every team in the country make certain to have available arena dates? Minnesota State had a concert booked for Regionals weekend this year. Many teams play in municipal arenas, where concerts are booked 6 months to a year in advance. If you have to block out 3 dates and pay for them, thatís a pretty expensive risk a school has to take.
    It'd be funny if this ever came to fruition, and the NCAA still demanded their $150k minimum take.

    Another wrinkle to this concept is TV -- we all love that the regionals are on ESPN networks/streaming...that Saturday is one of the best college hockey days of the year. As-is, ESPN knows where they're going well ahead of time, has scouted the locations, assigned teams of commentators, etc. They'd surely balk at the expense of not knowing where they'll be going, not to mention the potential broadcast nightmares associated with many of the rinks in college hockey. Imagine having a national broadcast out of some of the AHC/community barns? Yikes.

    r

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    14,517

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    This is making me think the only way we see on campus again is if the NCAA/coaches relent and start accepting bids for Yost, Kohl Center, the Ralph etc

    Back in the early 90s when on campus sites were used, I am wondering if those arenas were more readily available to remain open for a regional weekend and didn't have other commitments booked like newer multi purpose facilities do now. Also, if you still want to use the PWR to determine who hosts...was that done back then? Or was it a committee determining who would host based on merit and also based on the ability to host? Were there situations where teams hosted by default? Where perhaps a more deserving team should have hosted but couldn't?

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    554
    Sign me up! Canít wait to see how terrible the Mullins Center Ice looks in the third period of the regional championship.

  11. #11
    Drunkard
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Promised Land
    Posts
    17,504

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    In the long run, the current system is better on many levels.

    Itís been working just fine in the East. If they allow campus rinks to host, theyíll work fine in the West.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    912

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    Congrats to the cities, arenas and host for your selection as sites for the 2020 & 2021 regionals

    Could not agree more with the great story by Ben Feree: https://www.collegian.psu.edu/sports...d56bf5226.html

    Since we we were able to successfully expand the men's D-I tournament from 12 to 16 teams, I have been campaigning for years that the NCAA Regionals MUST be at the sites of the highest four seeds. They have earned the right to host after playing 30+ games

    I agree with Ben that the regionals should be played at the site of the highest seeds. More Fans, More $$$, Great Atmosphere and only one three teams travel, meaning less expenses! There were tons of empty seats in the MHOK and MBBall early rounds and it looks terrible on TV. Also it is not fair to the fans who buy season tickets at the #1 seeds, only to have the most important game(s) of the year be hundreds of miles away. I would think we should get ESPN to chime in on this too, as they did the best job they could hiding all the empty seats.

    And maybe (just maybe) we could use this additional revenue to invest in adding even more teams to the NCAA tournament
    Taking one by one....

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    * #1 Seeds have earned the right to host after 30+ games
    If a person thinks there is a 'right' to host, this makes sense. However, the #1 seeds don't host the conference tournaments (most, anyway), which lends some credence to the idea there is no 'right' to host in the post season.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    * Most all NCAA sports (Except MBB) have high seeds host regionals.
    Aside from the 'hockey is not at all like most sports' angle, we can say this: Those sports who have high seeds host do not have 5000+ person crowds at the games and/or meets. The ones who do are MBB and WBB (sometimes). MBB uses neutral sites for ONE reason: In basketball, that size of a crowd creates energy for the home team, and the advantage is too much. There is an argument to be made that hockey is similar in that regard. The advantage of crowd seems to negate the "other sports do it this way" argument.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    * Pro Sports - Only the Super Bowl is NOT at Highest seed
    Those are pro sports, in which the teams either own or lease their own arenas/stadia and have complete control over said buildings.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    * Not fair to #1 Seeds to be on neutral ice
    There is no reason it isn't fair. "Not fair" would be forcing them to play on away ice. If the #1s are on neutral ice, they should have the advantage. They are the #1 seed, and supposedly the better team, after all.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    * Less Expenses (only three teams (not 4) travel)
    Incorrect. Under the current plan, the average is that something like 8 teams out of 16 fly. In this case, depending on bracketing rules (separate post coming) it would be possible that 11 would have to fly. Merely giving the top seeds home ice does not fix this. Especially when the following are potential home cities (note that they are far from large airports): Houghton, Marquette and Sault-Ste-Marie, Michigan; Orono, Maine, (Wherever UNH plays their home games), Bemidji. That's just a start, and you get the idea. The visitors would have to first fly, and then potentially drive a few hours.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    * More Fans, Bands, Cheer, Ice Dancers
    NCAA rules would prohibit most of these no matter where the games were played.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    * More Revenue
    Not sure about more revenue. The regionals now average 5000 - 6000 fans. Most home sites in NCAA hockey can't match that. And, if the entire regional is on campus, and the host loses in the first round, it's likely going to be an empty barn on day 2.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    * Better Atmposhere
    Only if the home team wins game one, and it's fairly good sized arena.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    * Better for Season Ticket Holders of #1 Seed
    No complaints here.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    * Better for TV
    Not if the games are in a small rink. For example, what if Clarkson hosts? I like the small schools, but can that arena really support the kind of media necessary?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack McDonald View Post
    * Promote need to upgrade and/or replace older facilities on college ice hockey campuses
    It still takes money, and merely having a chance to host a region isn't going to magically create money.

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    912

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    Potential Brackets:

    The question is, of course, what are the rules?

    If the rules are:
    A) We just go by the serpentine bracket, and make minor adjustments to avoid intraconference games, then it ends up looking different than
    B) We make the 4 seed bands, but give the committee great liberty in making the bracket.

    This year's field:
    SCSU, UMD, Mankato, Mass
    Clark, NE, QU, Denver
    OSU, ASU, Corn, NoDame
    Harv, Prov, BGSU, AIC

    By A): SCSU v AIC; Den v OSU :: UMD v BGSU; QU v ASU :: Mankato v Prov; NE v Cornell :: UMass v Harv; Clark v NoDame
    This bracket has 10 flights.
    by B): It completely ends up the same because everyone has to fly to Minneapolis except the UMass region.
    By Current rules: Only 8 or 9 flights. So, there is no travel savings.

    Let's try it again:
    2018:
    SCSU, NoDame, Cornell, OSU
    Den, Mankato, Prov, Mich
    NE, Clark, Penn St, UMD
    BU, Prince, MTU, AFA

    A): SCSU v AFA; Mich v NE :: NoDame v MTU; Prov v Clark :: Cornell v BU; Mankato v UMD :: OSU v Princeton; Den v Penn St
    Everyone is flying except the hosts (save BU and maybe PennSt).
    B): SCSU v AFA; Mankato v UMD :: NoDame v MTU; Mich v NE :: Cornell v BU; Prov v Clark :: OSU v Prince; Den v Penn St
    Better: AFA, MTU, NE, Prince, Den and PennSt? are the only ones flying
    Current rules:
    The committee's bracket had 6 flights.

    So, you are not gaining much on average on flights or transportation.

  14. #14
    Coach Emeritus
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Beginning to plan for the 99th season of Tech hockey
    Posts
    2,891

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    Quote Originally Posted by Numbers View Post

    Especially when the following are potential home cities (note that they are far from large airports): Houghton, Marquette and Sault-Ste-Marie, Michigan; Orono, Maine, (Wherever UNH plays their home games), Bemidji. That's just a start, and you get the idea. The visitors would have to first fly, and then potentially drive a few hours.
    This argument is wrong, because the NCAA charters all flights in the tournament. There are commercial airports within 20 miles of each of these sites mentioned where those flights would land.

  15. #15
    Drunkard
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Promised Land
    Posts
    17,504

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    The fact that the vast majority of home rinks canít even hold enough fans to match an underwhelming regional in the current format is all one really needs to know.

    Yes, the ones that can hold larger crowds would be awesome, but they are the exception, not the rule. And until the blue bloods start dominating again, that will continue to be an exception.

  16. #16
    R!!!!...I!!!!!...T!!!!!!
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    1,992

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    Quote Originally Posted by cetihcra View Post
    Imagine having a national broadcast out of some of the AHC/community barns? Yikes.
    Those are mostly gone:
    Sacred Heart plays in AHL arena in Bridgeport
    AIC plays in AHL arena in Springfield
    Holy Cross plays in AHL arena in Worcester
    Canisius plays in Harbor Center
    Bentley - has own new arena
    RIT - has own relatively new arena
    Army, Air Force, Mercyhurst, Robert Morris - I can't speak to the quality of their facilities in this context, but know they are definitely not community barns.
    Niagara has their own facility that I know is sub-standard for an event like this and for TV.
    Can't we all just get along?
    Always remember... This is just a game we're talking about here. Let's not take it all too seriously.

  17. #17
    Lt. J. Isaac Powers, Starfleet
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    The Final Frontier
    Posts
    2,499

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    Quote Originally Posted by TigerFan86-87 View Post
    Army, Air Force, Mercyhurst, Robert Morris - I can't speak to the quality of their facilities in this context, but know they are definitely not community barns.
    Niagara has their own facility that I know is sub-standard for an event like this and for TV.
    Army and Air Force have arenas on par with the HarborCenter (Canisius). Mercyhurst's is on par with Niagara's. Robert Morris plays at what is technically a community rink.

    None of those six arenas -- and not Bentley's either -- holds even half the attendance Regionals usually attract. Even RIT's would be smaller than usual.


    Powers &8^]

  18. #18
    All it takes is two to be a network Ed Trefzger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    2,693

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    Quote Originally Posted by TigerFan86-87 View Post
    Those are mostly gone:
    Sacred Heart plays in AHL arena in Bridgeport
    AIC plays in AHL arena in Springfield
    Holy Cross plays in AHL arena in Worcester
    Canisius plays in Harbor Center
    Bentley - has own new arena
    RIT - has own relatively new arena
    Army, Air Force, Mercyhurst, Robert Morris - I can't speak to the quality of their facilities in this context, but know they are definitely not community barns.
    Niagara has their own facility that I know is sub-standard for an event like this and for TV.
    Only Sacred Heart and AIC have facilities that meet the current requirements for a regional, which includes 5,000 minimum capacity. Plus you need 75 seats for media in the press box. Not sure if those could even meet that.

    Only 25 of 60 home arenas are 5,000 or above in capacity: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing

  19. #19
    Drunkard
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Promised Land
    Posts
    17,504

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    And only 11-14 teams in any given season average more than 5000 fans/game in any given season.

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Lynn, MA, USA
    Posts
    2,536

    Re: NCAA Regionals Must be on campus

    Why not do the hockey tournament the way lacrosse does it. First round is at the rink of the higher seeds. You could schedule that on a Tuesday, followed by super regionals played on Saturday and Sunday. It might have prevented St. Cloud from losing yet again.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •