Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

[Tom Coughlin]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

You might want to invite the National guard to this one...............

I found highlights from that matchup https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ULvRPN0rDY

[spwood]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

Let's try this again... wanted to do a Bracketology based on standings as of 2/7/2019. Here are the teams by region with Pairwise ranking. I, again, got a 8-4 split:

Geneseo (2)
Oswego (3)
Norwich (4)
UMass Boston (5)
Wesleyan (7)
Salve Regina (16)
Utica (18)
Plymouth State (33)

Wisc-Stevens Point (1)
Wisc-Eau Claire (6)
St. Norbert (8)
Augsburg (11)

As I mentioned last time, if the Phinal Phour is going to be played in the west as is rumored, I believe all of the first round games will be in the east to avoid flights until the phinal phour and guarantee two western teams will make it.

First round:

Plymouth State @ Geneseo
Utica @ Oswego
Salve Regina @ Norwich
Wesleyan @ UMass Boston

QF:

Augsburg @ Wisc-Stevens Point
St. Norbert @ Wisc-Eau Claire
Plymouth State/Geneseo vs. UMass Boston/Wesleyan
Utica/Oswego vs. Salve Regina/Norwich

[bakdraft21]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

I found highlights from that matchup https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ULvRPN0rDY

boys will be boys...…..but this is the NHL

[jerrynu26]

I found highlights from that matchup https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ULvRPN0rDY

Pretty accurate.........

[BetterInLakePlacid]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

You might want to invite the National guard to this one...............

Only if Adrian is losing. If winning then everything with Point is always fine.

[Fishman'81]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

Let's try this again... wanted to do a Bracketology based on standings as of 2/7/2019. Here are the teams by region with Pairwise ranking. I, again, got a 8-4 split:

Geneseo (2)
Oswego (3)
Norwich (4)
UMass Boston (5)
Wesleyan (7)
Salve Regina (16)
Elmira (23)
Plymouth State (33)

Wisc-Stevens Point (1)
Wisc-Eau Claire (6)
St. Norbert (8)
Augsburg (11)

As I mentioned last time, if the Phinal Phour is going to be played in the west as is rumored, I believe all of the first round games will be in the east to avoid flights until the phinal phour and guarantee two western teams will make it.

First round:

Plymouth State @ Geneseo
Elmira @ Oswego
Salve Regina @ Norwich
Wesleyan @ UMass Boston

QF:

Augsburg @ Wisc-Stevens Point
St. Norbert @ Wisc-Eau Claire
Plymouth State/Geneseo vs. UMass Boston/Wesleyan
Elmira/Oswego vs. Salve Regina/Norwich

Fun post, thanks, but Utica would represent the UCHC at this moment, via the tie-breakers.

[sacole13]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

No Elmira has 22 points vs 21 for Utica and Wilkes.

[sacole13]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

UCHC
Elmira 10 3 2 .733 22 62-42 12 8 2 .591 78-72 5 3 0 7 5 2
Utica 10 3 1 .750 21 61-23 13 6 2 .667 82-40 8 2 1 4 4 1
Wilkes 10 3 1 .750 21 54-37 15 5 1 .738 84-57 7 1 1 8 4 0
Manhattanville 8 4 3 .633 19 64-48 12 7 3 .614 88-65 6 3 2 6 2 1
Nazareth 6 4 4 .571 16 40-37 9 6 6 .571 60-53 5 2 3 3 3 2
Lebanon Valley 5 8 2 .400 12 50-65 7 12 2 .381 66-94 3 4 1 3 7 1
Neumann 4 7 4 .400 12 49-49 5 13 4 .318 64-79 5 6 1 0 6 3
Stevenson 6 8 0 .429 12 42-41 9 12 0 .429 50-58 5 3 0 4 9 0
Chatham 3 10 1 .250 7 35-61 5 14 2 .286 54-85 4 6 2 1 8 0
King's 1 13 0 .071 2 19-73 1 20 0 .048 25-107 0 10 0 1 9 0

[Fishman'81]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

No Elmira has 22 points vs 21 for Utica and Wilkes.

In a normal world, yes, but the UCHC calculates conference points differently. Right now, the 3 teams are tied and Utica owns both H2H tiebreakers.

https://theuchc.com/standings.aspx?standings=3

[spwood]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

In a normal world, yes, but the UCHC calculates conference points differently. Right now, the 3 teams are tied and Utica owns both H2H tiebreakers.

https://theuchc.com/standings.aspx?standings=3

Confirmed on the UCHC website.... it lists all three teams with 32 points. Fine, just substitute Utica for Elmira. Nothing else changes.

[sacole13]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

So the UCHC simply makes up rules as they go along?? Are they MLS? Are they the WWE??

[sacole13]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

In UCHC Conference Men's Games ONLY:
3 Points for a win in regulation or standard 5-on-5 OT
0 Points for a loss in regulation or 5-on-5 OT
If the score remains tied at that point, it is credited as a TIE on the conference and overall records of both teams per NCAA guidelines. From there, the teams advance to a 3-on-3 session and shootout if needed to determine who takes the majority of the three available UCHC standings points ONLY. The winner gets two points, the losing team in those sessions receives one point. Both teams are credited with a tie on their record.

Stats in the 3-on-3 and shootout do NOT count towards season totals, except for misconduct and disqualification penalties which are tracked to be used for supplemental discpline as needed.

they forgot the rule that if your team members shoot the puck with an off handled stick (i.e. righty shoots left) that is worth 3/4 of a point on alternate Wednesdays.

[sacole13]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

In a normal world, yes, but the UCHC calculates conference points differently. Right now, the 3 teams are tied and Utica owns both H2H tiebreakers.

https://theuchc.com/standings.aspx?standings=3

So why do DIII hockey and here at USCHO not display the standings with the screwy UCHC rules?

[jcase]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

So why do DIII hockey and here at USCHO not display the standings with the screwy UCHC rules?

Those 'screwy' rules are also used in the Big10, NCHC, WCHA in D1 and MIAC in D3.
The D1 conference standings here at USCHO support it so it's certainly not for lack of functionality.

[sacole13]

Re: Bracketology 1.0 D3 style

Those 'screwy' rules are also used in the Big10, NCHC, WCHA in D1 and MIAC in D3.
The D1 conference standings here at USCHO support it so it's certainly not for lack of functionality.

2 points for a win, 1 point for an OT loss or a tie, simple straight forward.