Page 3 of 17 FirstFirst 12345678910111213 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 322

Thread: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

  1. #41
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    199,935

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019


  2. #42
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    199,935

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Julia Blitz singing National Letter of Intent


  3. #43
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    199,935

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Hannah Price


  4. #44
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    199,935

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019


  5. #45
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    199,935

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019


  6. #46
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    199,935

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019



  7. #47
    Conductor emeritus
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    3,563

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    We didn't play any league games, but our KRACH did change so we slipped a bit. I only ran 100k sims this week, but the averages should still be basically the same as if I had (the ranges may be narrower, but you can't assume that as a rule). There's basically a tie between us, Quinnipiac, and Brown just above the cut line, so we have a little bit of wiggle room here, but it's going to be pretty important to take a few points at Harvard and Dartmouth in a couple weeks, even though it's on the road.

    RPI KRACH (RRWP): 57.54 (0.3850)

    MCTs (Mean/Median/Mode/Range):
    Points - 19.82 / 20 / 20 / 6 - 35
    Rank - 7.24 / 7 / 6 / 1 - 12
    Playoffs - 77.6% (Home - 2.7%)
    Most likely opponent - at Princeton (18.7%)

    Conference Rankings:
    1. Clarkson
    2. Princeton
    3. SLU
    4. Cornell
      —————
    5. Colgate
    6. RPI
    7. Quinnipiac
    8. Brown
      —————
      —————
    9. Harvard
    10. Yale
    11. Dartmouth
    12. Union


    RPI Points vs. Position:
    Code:
       |     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9    10    11    12
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     4 |                                                                        
     5 |                                                                        
     6 |                                                                     0.0
     7 |                                                                     0.0
     8 |                                                               0.0   0.0
     9 |                                                               0.0   0.1
    10 |                                                         0.0   0.1   0.2
    11 |                                                   0.0   0.1   0.3   0.2
    12 |                                                   0.0   0.3   0.6   0.2
    13 |                                             0.0   0.2   0.8   0.8   0.1
    14 |                                             0.1   0.7   1.5   0.7   0.1
    15 |                                       0.0   0.5   2.1   1.8   0.4   0.0
    16 |                                 0.0   0.2   1.7   3.2   1.4   0.1      
    17 |                                 0.1   1.0   3.6   3.0   0.5   0.0      
    18 |                           0.0   0.3   2.8   4.6   1.8   0.2   0.0      
    19 |                           0.0   1.3   4.6   3.9   0.7   0.0            
    20 |                           0.1   3.1   5.3   2.2   0.2   0.0            
    21 |                           0.3   4.7   4.2   0.9   0.0                  
    22 |                     0.0   0.8   5.5   2.5   0.3   0.0                  
    23 |               0.0   0.0   1.5   4.7   1.1   0.1                        
    24 |               0.0   0.1   2.0   3.3   0.3   0.0                        
    25 |               0.0   0.3   2.0   1.6   0.1                              
    26 |               0.0   0.4   1.5   0.6   0.0                              
    27 |         0.0   0.1   0.5   0.8   0.2   0.0                              
    28 |         0.0   0.1   0.4   0.3   0.0                                    
    29 |   0.0   0.0   0.1   0.2   0.1   0.0                                    
    30 |   0.0   0.0   0.1   0.1   0.0                                          
    31 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                          
    32 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                
    33 |   0.0   0.0                                                            
    34 |         0.0                                                            
    35 |   0.0   0.0                                                            
    36 |                                                                        
    37 |                                                                        
    38 |                                                                        
    39 |                                                                        
    40 |
    But also we should score some goals (and also take more shots).
    RPI Pep Band
    GO GO GO YOU RED RED RED!!! and I guess Yale?
    🎶🎺🎺🎺 LET'S GO BLUES!

    2017-2018 RPI Pick to Click – Champion
    2013-2016 RPI Pick to Click – Back-to-Back-to-Back Runner-Up
    2014-15, 2018-19 ECAC Pick the Standings – Last Place

  8. #48
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    199,935

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019


  9. #49
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Canmore, Alberta
    Posts
    2,915

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    So, once again today this team demonstrates that they are a hard working and disciplined team. But severely lacking in offense. Over to you Marc Cavosie. What are you doing to turn that around?

  10. #50
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    213

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    I am shocked Selander did not play today.

  11. #51
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    199,935

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Quote Originally Posted by Reddington View Post
    I am shocked Selander did not play today.
    I wasn't. Bombay has been playing well this season, Selander had a busy game on Saturday, and it was a non-league game, so why not give Bombay some time? It's too bad that both are graduating this year.

  12. #52
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    213

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Well said;I did not realize Bombay was a senior also.

  13. #53
    Conductor emeritus
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    3,563

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    More games, more losses, more KRACH slippage, and even though these games didn't even count, our cushion is basically gone. At least we play meaningful hockey this weekend. Anything less than two points would put us in a worse position than we are now.

    RPI KRACH (RRWP): 43.98 (0.3338)

    MCTs (Mean/Median/Mode/Range):
    Points - 18.43 / 18 / 18 / 6 - 34
    Rank - 7.90 / 8 / 8 / 1 - 12
    Playoffs - 65.3% (Home - 1.1%)
    Most likely opponent - at Clarkson (17.4%)

    Conference Rankings:
    1. Clarkson
    2. Princeton
    3. SLU
    4. Cornell
      —————
    5. Colgate
    6. Quinnipiac
    7. Brown
    8. RPI
      —————
      —————
    9. Harvard
    10. Yale
    11. Dartmouth
    12. Union


    This Weekend's Playoff Implications:
    Code:
           |    Ha     |
    _______| W | T | L |
    |  | W |84%|74%|62%|
    |Da| T |76%|63%|51%|
    |  | L |66%|53%|39%|
    RPI Points vs. Position:
    Code:
       |     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9    10    11    12
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     4 |                                                                        
     5 |                                                                        
     6 |                                                                     0.0
     7 |                                                               0.0   0.0
     8 |                                                               0.0   0.1
     9 |                                                         0.0   0.1   0.2
    10 |                                                   0.0   0.0   0.3   0.4
    11 |                                                   0.0   0.2   0.7   0.4
    12 |                                                   0.1   0.7   1.1   0.3
    13 |                                             0.0   0.5   1.7   1.3   0.2
    14 |                                       0.0   0.2   1.7   2.6   0.9   0.1
    15 |                                       0.0   0.8   3.4   2.6   0.4   0.0
    16 |                                 0.0   0.2   2.6   4.7   1.6   0.1   0.0
    17 |                                 0.0   0.9   4.7   4.0   0.6   0.0      
    18 |                                 0.2   2.6   5.7   2.5   0.2            
    19 |                           0.0   0.8   4.3   4.8   1.0   0.0            
    20 |                           0.0   1.8   5.1   2.9   0.3   0.0            
    21 |                           0.2   2.8   4.0   1.2   0.1                  
    22 |                     0.0   0.4   3.3   2.6   0.4   0.0                  
    23 |                     0.0   0.7   2.8   1.2   0.1                        
    24 |                     0.1   0.9   1.9   0.4   0.0                        
    25 |               0.0   0.1   1.0   1.0   0.1   0.0                        
    26 |               0.0   0.2   0.7   0.4   0.0                              
    27 |               0.0   0.2   0.3   0.1                                    
    28 |         0.0   0.1   0.1   0.1   0.0                                    
    29 |         0.0   0.0   0.1   0.0                                          
    30 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                          
    31 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                
    32 |   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                      
    33 |   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                      
    34 |   0.0   0.0                                                            
    35 |                                                                        
    36 |                                                                        
    37 |                                                                        
    38 |                                                                        
    39 |                                                                        
    40 |
    RPI Pep Band
    GO GO GO YOU RED RED RED!!! and I guess Yale?
    🎶🎺🎺🎺 LET'S GO BLUES!

    2017-2018 RPI Pick to Click – Champion
    2013-2016 RPI Pick to Click – Back-to-Back-to-Back Runner-Up
    2014-15, 2018-19 ECAC Pick the Standings – Last Place

  14. #54
    Conductor emeritus
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    3,563

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Before this weekend, I said two points would be enough to keep us at break-even, but Harvard taking four points has propelled them above us on the table and left us in a much more precarious position. Looking forward, we've got a tough home weekend coming. Knocking off Princeton is unlikely, but beating Quinnipiac is just the kind of win we need to get at home if we think we're good enough to compete in this league. Regardless, anything less than two points would likely push us on the wrong side of the coin flip.

    RPI KRACH (RRWP): 43.09 (0.3317)

    MCTs (Mean/Median/Mode/Range):
    Points - 17.85 / 18 / 18 / 6 - 34
    Rank - 8.28 / 8 / 9 / 1 - 12
    Playoffs - 53.1% (Home - 0.6%)
    Most likely opponent - at Princeton (19.7%)

    Conference Rankings:
    1. Princeton
    2. Cornell
    3. Colgate
    4. Clarkson
      —————
    5. SLU
    6. Harvard
    7. Quinnipiac
    8. Brown
      —————
      —————
    9. RPI
    10. Dartmouth
    11. Yale
    12. Union


    This Weekend's Playoff Implications:
    Code:
           |    Pr     |
    _______| W | T | L |
    |  | W |82%|73%|65%|
    |Qu| T |70%|60%|51%|
    |  | L |60%|47%|39%|
    RPI Points vs. Position:
    Code:
       |     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9    10    11    12
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     6 |                                                               0.0   0.0
     7 |                                                         0.0   0.0   0.0
     8 |                                                         0.0   0.0   0.0
     9 |                                                         0.0   0.1   0.1
    10 |                                                   0.0   0.1   0.4   0.1
    11 |                                                   0.0   0.4   0.7   0.1
    12 |                                             0.0   0.2   1.1   1.1   0.1
    13 |                                             0.0   0.7   2.3   1.1   0.0
    14 |                                       0.0   0.1   2.3   3.3   0.8   0.0
    15 |                                       0.0   0.6   4.5   3.1   0.4   0.0
    16 |                                 0.0   0.1   2.0   6.4   2.2   0.1   0.0
    17 |                                 0.0   0.4   4.1   6.3   1.0   0.0      
    18 |                                 0.1   1.5   6.0   4.4   0.3   0.0      
    19 |                           0.0   0.3   3.0   5.8   2.1   0.1            
    20 |                           0.0   0.9   4.1   4.0   0.7   0.0            
    21 |                     0.0   0.1   1.6   3.8   1.8   0.2   0.0            
    22 |                     0.0   0.2   2.1   2.4   0.6   0.0                  
    23 |               0.0   0.0   0.4   1.8   1.1   0.1   0.0                  
    24 |               0.0   0.1   0.6   1.2   0.3   0.0                        
    25 |               0.0   0.1   0.5   0.5   0.1   0.0                        
    26 |               0.0   0.1   0.3   0.1   0.0                              
    27 |         0.0   0.0   0.1   0.1   0.0   0.0                              
    28 |         0.0   0.0   0.1   0.0   0.0                                    
    29 |         0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                    
    30 |         0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                          
    31 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                
    32 |   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                      
    33 |   0.0   0.0                                                            
    34 |   0.0                                                                  
    35 |                                                                        
    36 |                                                                        
    37 |                                                                        
    38 |
    RPI Pep Band
    GO GO GO YOU RED RED RED!!! and I guess Yale?
    🎶🎺🎺🎺 LET'S GO BLUES!

    2017-2018 RPI Pick to Click – Champion
    2013-2016 RPI Pick to Click – Back-to-Back-to-Back Runner-Up
    2014-15, 2018-19 ECAC Pick the Standings – Last Place

  15. #55
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    199,935

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Who would have thought that after six league games, RPI would be tied in the standings with Clarkson?

  16. #56
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    213

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    No one can say they predicted that. Lovisa is tremendous.

  17. #57
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    199,935

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Quote Originally Posted by Reddington View Post
    No one can say they predicted that. Lovisa is tremendous.
    I agree. On the Clarkson board, a Clarkson fan, who will remain nameless, was disappointed that Selander was picked over Sauve on the preseason ECAC all-star team, despite the fact that Sauve had not yet played for Clarkson. Preseason teams are pretty meaningless, but Selander was the logical choice.

  18. #58
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Posts
    213

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Based on Lovisa' s performance last year, she easily should have been a pre-season pick. That's not taking anything from Sauve but she is the newcomer.

  19. #59
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Location
    ellicott city, md, usa
    Posts
    10,746

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph Baer View Post
    I agree. On the Clarkson board, a Clarkson fan, who will remain nameless, was disappointed that Selander was picked over Sauve on the preseason ECAC all-star team, despite the fact that Sauve had not yet played for Clarkson. Preseason teams are pretty meaningless, but Selander was the logical choice.
    I was not disappointed Ralph, only pointing out Selander's pick.
    Fan of CLARKSON: 2014, 2017 & 2018 NC$$ WOMEN'S DIV 1 HOCKEY NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
    And of 2 Patty Kaz recepients: Jamie Lee Rattray and Loren Gabel
    WHOOOOOOOOO WHOOOOOOOOO
    If Union Can Do It So Can CCT (One of These Years)

  20. #60
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    199,935

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Quote Originally Posted by vicb View Post
    I was not disappointed Ralph, only pointing out Selander's pick.
    I guess that it is the usual problem with posts rather than conversations -- it is hard to figure out the exact intent of a post. I have certainly been misinterpreted many times also. You wrote:

    Clarkson places Gabel, Giguere and Shelton on the ECAC Pre-Season All League team. Congrats to them. Sauve is passed over for the goalie position.

    https://www.ecachockey.com/women/201...son_All-League
    I interpreted "passed over" as meaning "she should have won, but didn't". As I wrote in response that I chuckled over this and did say that when the smoke clears, Sauve could be the end-of-year selection.


    Moving on. Considering RPI's lack of offense this season and the amount that the team has to rely on Selander to have a shot at the playoffs, I wonder how they will do next year. With both Selander and Bombay graduating and Gregg yet to have seen any game action, the team will have to rely on rookies as in 2015-16. Amanda Rampado appears to be a good goaltender, but I wonder how good. We still need another, or at least I have not seen another mentioned anywhere.
    Last edited by Ralph Baer; 12-06-2018 at 05:52 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •