Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1234567891011 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 203

Thread: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

  1. #21
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    196,888

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019


  2. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    7,888

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph Baer View Post
    Wow, 58 save shutout, very impressive!
    Minnesota Golden Gopher Hockey

  3. #23
    Made in the USA
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    47,498

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Impressive! Have a bad feeling about today given this sort of thing usually doesn't happen twice in a row, but sometimes you just need to buy enough time to win.
    It was an honor to present your colors, RPI. Let's Go 'TUTE!
    May 14th, 2011, 11:00 PM ET: 2147483647

    "Better to be infamous than never famous at all." -Roger Stone

    Quote Originally Posted by French Rage View Post
    Ahh crap I agree exactly with what FlagDude said.
    Quote Originally Posted by Handyman View Post
    And yet, even if Flaggy is complete tinfoil hat, every day it looks closer and closer to the truth.
    Quote Originally Posted by burd View Post
    So flaggy: you win.

  4. #24
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    196,888

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019


  5. #25
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    196,888

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    and in addition



    Does anyone know if an RPI player won this before?

  6. #26
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    196,888

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019


  7. #27
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    196,888

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Neutral Zone shows Taylor Zahirnyi, a 5'5", 130lb, RD, born 8/8/00, playing for the New Jersey Colonials 19U team, as committed to RPI for next fall. They rate her at 3.25.

    I did not notice her mentioned elsewhere as an RPI recruit. Her twitter page is protected, so I can't tell if she has tweeted the commitment.

    scoring a goal last year for Lawrenceville: https://www.maxpreps.com/athlete/tayl...-FA/videos.htm
    Last edited by Ralph Baer; 10-23-2018 at 07:19 AM.

  8. #28
    Really??!!
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Great white north
    Posts
    1,913

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019




    Congrats and Best of Luck

  9. #29
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    196,888

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019


  10. #30
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    196,888

  11. #31
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    196,888

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019


  12. #32
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    196,888

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Hockey Tech https://www.collegecommitments.com/Co...x?x7cq9=FEMALE shows RPI has received a commitment for 2019 from Teeghan Dalby of the Stoney Creek Sabres

    https://pwhl3.stats.pointstreak.com/p...seasonid=18624

  13. #33
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    196,888

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019


  14. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Canmore, Alberta
    Posts
    2,886

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Wow! I hate to be negative (my rep is that I am an incurable optimist about RPI womens hockey) but 8 goals in 8 games! This team does not have as much speed as previous Engineer teams, but somehow they need to find a way to generate a little bit of offense. May need to focus on crashing the net, getting in or near the blue paint and then being nasty. Risk taking the odd penalty (usually in those situations the defending team gets called) and more than a few bumps and bruises.

  15. #35
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    196,888

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    2019 recruit Emily King received an honorable mention in this list of top Minnesota HS players https://www.stateofhockey.com/news_article/show/966789.

  16. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    7,174

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph Baer View Post
    2019 recruit Emily King received an honorable mention in this list of top Minnesota HS players https://www.stateofhockey.com/news_article/show/966789.
    Yes but Chris Dilks likes Maddie Peterson at #10.........10. Maddie Peterson, Princeton High School(Committed to RPI)

    Peterson isn’t likely to draw much attention playing for Princeton, which is outside of the metro area and not a traditional power, but she was consistently impressive in the fall Elite League. An excellent skater with decent hands, she scored 30 goals last season, and could improve on that this year. https://www.sbncollegehockey.com/hig...key-watch-list
    Brandon Pirri: Turk would give it to Jagr. That's awesome! Jagr's untouchable. And he would give it to Jagr.

  17. #37
    Let's Go 'Tute! Ralph Baer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    196,888

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Quote Originally Posted by turk181 View Post
    Yes but Chris Dilks likes Maddie Peterson at #10.........10. Maddie Peterson, Princeton High School(Committed to RPI)

    Peterson isn’t likely to draw much attention playing for Princeton, which is outside of the metro area and not a traditional power, but she was consistently impressive in the fall Elite League. An excellent skater with decent hands, she scored 30 goals last season, and could improve on that this year. https://www.sbncollegehockey.com/hig...key-watch-list
    I suspect that Dilks is more accurate as MS gives Peterson a 4.00 and King 3.75. Indeed it is good to see both mentioned. Hopefully, at least one can put the puck in the net. As hab wrote, we currently are lacking much goal scoring ability.

  18. #38
    Conductor emeritus
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    3,485

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    Big four point weekend that we'll need for the playoff push. I'll post my first KRACHy prediction post tomorrow or monday.
    RPI Pep Band
    GO GO GO YOU RED RED RED!!! and I guess Yale?
    🎶🎺🎺🎺 LET'S GO BLUES!

    2017-2018 RPI Pick to Click – Champion
    2013-2016 RPI Pick to Click – Back-to-Back-to-Back Runner-Up
    2014-2015 ECAC Pick the Standings – Last Place


  19. #39
    Conductor emeritus
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    New Haven, CT
    Posts
    3,485

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    A lot of season left to play, but RPI is off to a decent start, at least as far as the Ws and Ls go. Basically we lost the games we were "supposed" to lose and won the games we "should" win if we want to make the playoffs. Right now we're projecting to be four points clear of the playoff line (and seven points below the home-ice cutoff), so we're in good position moving forward. We will want to, you know, score more goals, but baby steps.

    RPI KRACH (RRWP): 62.08 (0.4027)

    MCTs (Mean/Median/Mode/Range):
    Points - 20.72 / 21 / 21 / 6 - 37
    Rank - 7.01 / 7 / 7 / 1 - 12
    Playoffs - 84.1% (Home - 5.1%)
    Most likely opponent - at Clarkson (21.3%)

    Conference Rankings:
    1. Clarkson
    2. Princeton
    3. SLU
    4. Colgate
      —————
    5. Cornell
    6. Brown
    7. RPI
    8. Quinnipiac
      —————
      —————
    9. Harvard
    10. Dartmouth
    11. Union
    12. Yale



    RPI Points vs. Position:
    Code:
       |     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9    10    11    12
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
     4 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x
     5 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x
     6 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x   0.0
     7 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.0
     8 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.0   0.0
     9 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.0   0.0
    10 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.0   0.1   0.0
    11 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.1   0.1   0.0
    12 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.0   0.3   0.2   0.0
    13 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.3   0.6   0.2   0.0
    14 |     x     x     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.1   0.8   0.9   0.2   0.0
    15 |     x     x     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.5   1.7   0.9   0.1   0.0
    16 |     x     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.1   1.5   2.5   0.6   0.0     x
    17 |     x     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.6   3.1   2.6   0.3   0.0     x
    18 |     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.1   1.9   4.5   1.9   0.1   0.0     x
    19 |     x     x     x     x   0.0   0.5   3.7   4.6   1.0   0.0     x     x
    20 |     x     x     x   0.0   0.0   1.5   5.4   3.5   0.4   0.0     x     x
    21 |     x     x     x   0.0   0.1   3.1   5.7   2.0   0.1   0.0     x     x
    22 |     x     x     x   0.0   0.4   4.6   4.5   0.8   0.0     x     x     x
    23 |     x     x     x   0.0   1.0   5.1   2.6   0.2   0.0     x     x     x
    24 |     x   0.0   0.0   0.2   1.8   4.2   1.1   0.0     x     x     x     x
    25 |     x   0.0   0.0   0.4   2.2   2.5   0.3   0.0     x     x     x     x
    26 |     x   0.0   0.1   0.8   1.9   1.0   0.0   0.0     x     x     x     x
    27 |     x   0.0   0.2   0.9   1.0   0.3   0.0     x     x     x     x     x
    28 |     x   0.0   0.3   0.7   0.4   0.1   0.0     x     x     x     x     x
    29 |   0.0   0.1   0.3   0.3   0.1   0.0     x     x     x     x     x     x
    30 |   0.0   0.1   0.2   0.1   0.0   0.0     x     x     x     x     x     x
    31 |   0.0   0.1   0.1   0.0   0.0     x     x     x     x     x     x     x
    32 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x
    33 |   0.0   0.0   0.0     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x
    34 |   0.0   0.0   0.0     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x
    35 |   0.0   0.0   0.0     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x
    36 |   0.0   0.0     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x
    37 |   0.0     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x
    38 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x
    39 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x
    40 |     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x     x
    RPI Pep Band
    GO GO GO YOU RED RED RED!!! and I guess Yale?
    🎶🎺🎺🎺 LET'S GO BLUES!

    2017-2018 RPI Pick to Click – Champion
    2013-2016 RPI Pick to Click – Back-to-Back-to-Back Runner-Up
    2014-2015 ECAC Pick the Standings – Last Place


  20. #40
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Canmore, Alberta
    Posts
    2,886

    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

    The Engineers remain severely challenged in goal production, but after watching both games this weekend I am back to being somewhat optimistic about the season. Granted, it was only Brown and Yale, (and playing at HFH), but the team looked good. Our strength is goaltenders (plural, now, clearly), but there were many other positives. We play a pretty solid game on defence; our breakouts are far better than in previous years (greater use of stretch passes); our PP really moves the puck well (although Brown made them look good with their incredibly passive PK strategy); and Orosz, for one, demonstrated the kind of drive in the offensive zone that should eventually result in more goal production.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •