Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RPI Engineers 2018-2019

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019


    sigpic

    Let's Go 'Tute!

    Maxed out at 2,147,483,647 at 10:00 AM EDT 9/17/07.

    2012 Poser Of The Year

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

      We didn't play any league games, but our KRACH did change so we slipped a bit. I only ran 100k sims this week, but the averages should still be basically the same as if I had (the ranges may be narrower, but you can't assume that as a rule). There's basically a tie between us, Quinnipiac, and Brown just above the cut line, so we have a little bit of wiggle room here, but it's going to be pretty important to take a few points at Harvard and Dartmouth in a couple weeks, even though it's on the road.

      RPI KRACH (RRWP): 57.54 (0.3850)

      MCTs (Mean/Median/Mode/Range):
      Points - 19.82 / 20 / 20 / 6 - 35
      Rank - 7.24 / 7 / 6 / 1 - 12
      Playoffs - 77.6% (Home - 2.7%)
      Most likely opponent - at Princeton (18.7%)

      Conference Rankings:
      1. Clarkson
      2. Princeton
      3. SLU
      4. Cornell
        —————
      5. Colgate
      6. RPI
      7. Quinnipiac
      8. Brown
        —————
        —————
      9. Harvard
      10. Yale
      11. Dartmouth
      12. Union


      RPI Points vs. Position:
      Code:
         |     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9    10    11    12
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
       4 |                                                                        
       5 |                                                                        
       6 |                                                                     0.0
       7 |                                                                     0.0
       8 |                                                               0.0   0.0
       9 |                                                               0.0   0.1
      10 |                                                         0.0   0.1   0.2
      11 |                                                   0.0   0.1   0.3   0.2
      12 |                                                   0.0   0.3   0.6   0.2
      13 |                                             0.0   0.2   0.8   0.8   0.1
      14 |                                             0.1   0.7   1.5   0.7   0.1
      15 |                                       0.0   0.5   2.1   1.8   0.4   0.0
      16 |                                 0.0   0.2   1.7   3.2   1.4   0.1      
      17 |                                 0.1   1.0   3.6   3.0   0.5   0.0      
      18 |                           0.0   0.3   2.8   4.6   1.8   0.2   0.0      
      19 |                           0.0   1.3   4.6   3.9   0.7   0.0            
      20 |                           0.1   3.1   5.3   2.2   0.2   0.0            
      21 |                           0.3   4.7   4.2   0.9   0.0                  
      22 |                     0.0   0.8   5.5   2.5   0.3   0.0                  
      23 |               0.0   0.0   1.5   4.7   1.1   0.1                        
      24 |               0.0   0.1   2.0   3.3   0.3   0.0                        
      25 |               0.0   0.3   2.0   1.6   0.1                              
      26 |               0.0   0.4   1.5   0.6   0.0                              
      27 |         0.0   0.1   0.5   0.8   0.2   0.0                              
      28 |         0.0   0.1   0.4   0.3   0.0                                    
      29 |   0.0   0.0   0.1   0.2   0.1   0.0                                    
      30 |   0.0   0.0   0.1   0.1   0.0                                          
      31 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                          
      32 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                
      33 |   0.0   0.0                                                            
      34 |         0.0                                                            
      35 |   0.0   0.0                                                            
      36 |                                                                        
      37 |                                                                        
      38 |                                                                        
      39 |                                                                        
      40 |
      But also we should score some goals (and also take more shots).
      RPI Pep Band
      GO GO GO YOU RED RED RED!!! and I guess Yale?
      🎶🎺🎺🎺 LET'S GO BLUES!

      2017-2018 RPI Pick to Click – Champion
      2013-2016 RPI Pick to Click – Back-to-Back-to-Back Runner-Up
      2014-15, 2018-19 ECAC Pick the Standings – Last Place

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

        sigpic

        Let's Go 'Tute!

        Maxed out at 2,147,483,647 at 10:00 AM EDT 9/17/07.

        2012 Poser Of The Year

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

          So, once again today this team demonstrates that they are a hard working and disciplined team. But severely lacking in offense. Over to you Marc Cavosie. What are you doing to turn that around?

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

            I am shocked Selander did not play today.

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

              Originally posted by Reddington View Post
              I am shocked Selander did not play today.
              I wasn't. Bombay has been playing well this season, Selander had a busy game on Saturday, and it was a non-league game, so why not give Bombay some time? It's too bad that both are graduating this year.
              sigpic

              Let's Go 'Tute!

              Maxed out at 2,147,483,647 at 10:00 AM EDT 9/17/07.

              2012 Poser Of The Year

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

                Well said;I did not realize Bombay was a senior also.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

                  More games, more losses, more KRACH slippage, and even though these games didn't even count, our cushion is basically gone. At least we play meaningful hockey this weekend. Anything less than two points would put us in a worse position than we are now.

                  RPI KRACH (RRWP): 43.98 (0.3338)

                  MCTs (Mean/Median/Mode/Range):
                  Points - 18.43 / 18 / 18 / 6 - 34
                  Rank - 7.90 / 8 / 8 / 1 - 12
                  Playoffs - 65.3% (Home - 1.1%)
                  Most likely opponent - at Clarkson (17.4%)

                  Conference Rankings:
                  1. Clarkson
                  2. Princeton
                  3. SLU
                  4. Cornell
                    —————
                  5. Colgate
                  6. Quinnipiac
                  7. Brown
                  8. RPI
                    —————
                    —————
                  9. Harvard
                  10. Yale
                  11. Dartmouth
                  12. Union


                  This Weekend's Playoff Implications:
                  Code:
                         |    Ha     |
                  _______| W | T | L |
                  |  | W |84%|74%|62%|
                  |Da| T |76%|63%|51%|
                  |  | L |66%|53%|39%|
                  RPI Points vs. Position:
                  Code:
                     |     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9    10    11    12
                  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   4 |                                                                        
                   5 |                                                                        
                   6 |                                                                     0.0
                   7 |                                                               0.0   0.0
                   8 |                                                               0.0   0.1
                   9 |                                                         0.0   0.1   0.2
                  10 |                                                   0.0   0.0   0.3   0.4
                  11 |                                                   0.0   0.2   0.7   0.4
                  12 |                                                   0.1   0.7   1.1   0.3
                  13 |                                             0.0   0.5   1.7   1.3   0.2
                  14 |                                       0.0   0.2   1.7   2.6   0.9   0.1
                  15 |                                       0.0   0.8   3.4   2.6   0.4   0.0
                  16 |                                 0.0   0.2   2.6   4.7   1.6   0.1   0.0
                  17 |                                 0.0   0.9   4.7   4.0   0.6   0.0      
                  18 |                                 0.2   2.6   5.7   2.5   0.2            
                  19 |                           0.0   0.8   4.3   4.8   1.0   0.0            
                  20 |                           0.0   1.8   5.1   2.9   0.3   0.0            
                  21 |                           0.2   2.8   4.0   1.2   0.1                  
                  22 |                     0.0   0.4   3.3   2.6   0.4   0.0                  
                  23 |                     0.0   0.7   2.8   1.2   0.1                        
                  24 |                     0.1   0.9   1.9   0.4   0.0                        
                  25 |               0.0   0.1   1.0   1.0   0.1   0.0                        
                  26 |               0.0   0.2   0.7   0.4   0.0                              
                  27 |               0.0   0.2   0.3   0.1                                    
                  28 |         0.0   0.1   0.1   0.1   0.0                                    
                  29 |         0.0   0.0   0.1   0.0                                          
                  30 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                          
                  31 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                
                  32 |   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                      
                  33 |   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                      
                  34 |   0.0   0.0                                                            
                  35 |                                                                        
                  36 |                                                                        
                  37 |                                                                        
                  38 |                                                                        
                  39 |                                                                        
                  40 |
                  RPI Pep Band
                  GO GO GO YOU RED RED RED!!! and I guess Yale?
                  🎶🎺🎺🎺 LET'S GO BLUES!

                  2017-2018 RPI Pick to Click – Champion
                  2013-2016 RPI Pick to Click – Back-to-Back-to-Back Runner-Up
                  2014-15, 2018-19 ECAC Pick the Standings – Last Place

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

                    Before this weekend, I said two points would be enough to keep us at break-even, but Harvard taking four points has propelled them above us on the table and left us in a much more precarious position. Looking forward, we've got a tough home weekend coming. Knocking off Princeton is unlikely, but beating Quinnipiac is just the kind of win we need to get at home if we think we're good enough to compete in this league. Regardless, anything less than two points would likely push us on the wrong side of the coin flip.

                    RPI KRACH (RRWP): 43.09 (0.3317)

                    MCTs (Mean/Median/Mode/Range):
                    Points - 17.85 / 18 / 18 / 6 - 34
                    Rank - 8.28 / 8 / 9 / 1 - 12
                    Playoffs - 53.1% (Home - 0.6%)
                    Most likely opponent - at Princeton (19.7%)

                    Conference Rankings:
                    1. Princeton
                    2. Cornell
                    3. Colgate
                    4. Clarkson
                      —————
                    5. SLU
                    6. Harvard
                    7. Quinnipiac
                    8. Brown
                      —————
                      —————
                    9. RPI
                    10. Dartmouth
                    11. Yale
                    12. Union


                    This Weekend's Playoff Implications:
                    Code:
                           |    Pr     |
                    _______| W | T | L |
                    |  | W |82%|73%|65%|
                    |Qu| T |70%|60%|51%|
                    |  | L |60%|47%|39%|
                    RPI Points vs. Position:
                    Code:
                       |     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9    10    11    12
                    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     6 |                                                               0.0   0.0
                     7 |                                                         0.0   0.0   0.0
                     8 |                                                         0.0   0.0   0.0
                     9 |                                                         0.0   0.1   0.1
                    10 |                                                   0.0   0.1   0.4   0.1
                    11 |                                                   0.0   0.4   0.7   0.1
                    12 |                                             0.0   0.2   1.1   1.1   0.1
                    13 |                                             0.0   0.7   2.3   1.1   0.0
                    14 |                                       0.0   0.1   2.3   3.3   0.8   0.0
                    15 |                                       0.0   0.6   4.5   3.1   0.4   0.0
                    16 |                                 0.0   0.1   2.0   6.4   2.2   0.1   0.0
                    17 |                                 0.0   0.4   4.1   6.3   1.0   0.0      
                    18 |                                 0.1   1.5   6.0   4.4   0.3   0.0      
                    19 |                           0.0   0.3   3.0   5.8   2.1   0.1            
                    20 |                           0.0   0.9   4.1   4.0   0.7   0.0            
                    21 |                     0.0   0.1   1.6   3.8   1.8   0.2   0.0            
                    22 |                     0.0   0.2   2.1   2.4   0.6   0.0                  
                    23 |               0.0   0.0   0.4   1.8   1.1   0.1   0.0                  
                    24 |               0.0   0.1   0.6   1.2   0.3   0.0                        
                    25 |               0.0   0.1   0.5   0.5   0.1   0.0                        
                    26 |               0.0   0.1   0.3   0.1   0.0                              
                    27 |         0.0   0.0   0.1   0.1   0.0   0.0                              
                    28 |         0.0   0.0   0.1   0.0   0.0                                    
                    29 |         0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                    
                    30 |         0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                          
                    31 |   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                
                    32 |   0.0   0.0   0.0                                                      
                    33 |   0.0   0.0                                                            
                    34 |   0.0                                                                  
                    35 |                                                                        
                    36 |                                                                        
                    37 |                                                                        
                    38 |
                    RPI Pep Band
                    GO GO GO YOU RED RED RED!!! and I guess Yale?
                    🎶🎺🎺🎺 LET'S GO BLUES!

                    2017-2018 RPI Pick to Click – Champion
                    2013-2016 RPI Pick to Click – Back-to-Back-to-Back Runner-Up
                    2014-15, 2018-19 ECAC Pick the Standings – Last Place

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

                      Who would have thought that after six league games, RPI would be tied in the standings with Clarkson?
                      sigpic

                      Let's Go 'Tute!

                      Maxed out at 2,147,483,647 at 10:00 AM EDT 9/17/07.

                      2012 Poser Of The Year

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

                        No one can say they predicted that. Lovisa is tremendous.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

                          Originally posted by Reddington View Post
                          No one can say they predicted that. Lovisa is tremendous.
                          I agree. On the Clarkson board, a Clarkson fan, who will remain nameless, was disappointed that Selander was picked over Sauve on the preseason ECAC all-star team, despite the fact that Sauve had not yet played for Clarkson. Preseason teams are pretty meaningless, but Selander was the logical choice.
                          sigpic

                          Let's Go 'Tute!

                          Maxed out at 2,147,483,647 at 10:00 AM EDT 9/17/07.

                          2012 Poser Of The Year

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

                            Based on Lovisa' s performance last year, she easily should have been a pre-season pick. That's not taking anything from Sauve but she is the newcomer.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

                              Originally posted by Ralph Baer View Post
                              I agree. On the Clarkson board, a Clarkson fan, who will remain nameless, was disappointed that Selander was picked over Sauve on the preseason ECAC all-star team, despite the fact that Sauve had not yet played for Clarkson. Preseason teams are pretty meaningless, but Selander was the logical choice.
                              I was not disappointed Ralph, only pointing out Selander's pick.
                              Fan of CLARKSON: 2014, 2017 & 2018 NC$$ WOMEN'S DIV 1 HOCKEY NATIONAL CHAMPIONS *******https://fanforum.uscho.com/core/images/smilies/smile.gi*********
                              And of 3 Patty Kaz recepients: Jamie Lee Rattray, Loren Gabel and Elizabeth Giguere
                              WHOOOOOOOOO WHOOOOOOOOO
                              If Union Can Do It So Can CCT (One of These Years) *******https://fanforum.uscho.com/core/images/smilies/smile.gi*********

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: RPI Engineers 2018-2019

                                Originally posted by vicb View Post
                                I was not disappointed Ralph, only pointing out Selander's pick.
                                I guess that it is the usual problem with posts rather than conversations -- it is hard to figure out the exact intent of a post. I have certainly been misinterpreted many times also. You wrote:

                                Clarkson places Gabel, Giguere and Shelton on the ECAC Pre-Season All League team. Congrats to them. Sauve is passed over for the goalie position.

                                https://www.ecachockey.com/women/201...son_All-League
                                I interpreted "passed over" as meaning "she should have won, but didn't". As I wrote in response that I chuckled over this and did say that when the smoke clears, Sauve could be the end-of-year selection.


                                Moving on. Considering RPI's lack of offense this season and the amount that the team has to rely on Selander to have a shot at the playoffs, I wonder how they will do next year. With both Selander and Bombay graduating and Gregg yet to have seen any game action, the team will have to rely on rookies as in 2015-16. Amanda Rampado appears to be a good goaltender, but I wonder how good. We still need another, or at least I have not seen another mentioned anywhere.
                                Last edited by Ralph Baer; 12-06-2018, 05:52 AM.
                                sigpic

                                Let's Go 'Tute!

                                Maxed out at 2,147,483,647 at 10:00 AM EDT 9/17/07.

                                2012 Poser Of The Year

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X