PDA

View Full Version : Suspend Kyle Rau for as long as Jason Zucker is unable to play!



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51

Old Pio
02-15-2012, 02:09 AM
This kind of talk makes me very uncomfortable.

I don't think there's any place on USCHO for any language that almost makes me want to defend a Gopher for the second time.


It's impressive though that you have any anger left after your right wing rants in the cafe.

Try not to be so literal minded. I'm engaging in the same kind of hyperbole as the Gopher fans who blamed JZ "for not defending himself," and for jaking it on his way off the ice, etc. You didn't seem to be offended by that. They were trolling and I've been responding. Yes, of course it's childish. And no, I don't want that little punk injured. "That would be wrong." So, let me officially retract the phrase: "neck snapped" and replace it with "a*s kicked." Okay?

If you want to be "uncomfortable" about something, be uncomfortable with the Gopher deadenders who continue to defend that cheap shot artist (a distinct minority, to be sure).

As to my "right wing rants," and my "anger" I'm not angry and I don't rant. I do, however, try to bring a little light into the dark fantasy world of *******s.

Bakunin
02-15-2012, 03:06 AM
Only if Zucker has a 0 for injury rating That guy clearly can't take a check!
There'd be real trouble if Brent ever tried to pay him for something.

Tipsy McStagger
02-15-2012, 06:09 AM
As to my "right wing rants," and my "anger" I'm not angry and I don't rant. I do, however, try to bring a little light into the dark fantasy world of *******s.
If they're anything like your posts in this thread, I am sure they are well thought out posts, filled with reason and facts.

Gurtholfin
02-15-2012, 07:33 AM
Try not to be so literal minded.

As to my "right wing rants," and my "anger" I'm not angry and I don't rant. I do, however, try to bring a little light into the dark fantasy world of *******s.


Good advice! I'll work on that.


I don't understand the term "*******." :confused:

goldy_331
02-15-2012, 08:07 AM
Good advice! I'll work on that.


I don't understand the term "*******." :confused:

My guess is a "clever" combination of "liberal" and "******", very open minded and modern of OP. ;)

Jaws
02-15-2012, 09:59 AM
I think old pio needs to go out for a walk. Shut this thing down and lets move on to who we can be ticked of at this week.

Old Pio
02-15-2012, 12:36 PM
If they're anything like your posts in this thread, I am sure they are well thought out posts, filled with reason and facts.

Shut up, he explained.

Old Pio
02-15-2012, 12:38 PM
I think old pio needs to go out for a walk. Shut this thing down and lets move on to who we can be ticked of at this week.

You're about the tenth (or is it 110th) genius who's been following this thread, posting, and demanding that it be shut down. Hmmmmmm, there seems to be an "Ethiopian in the fuel supply" here.

kdilks
02-15-2012, 12:38 PM
I don't understand the term "*******." :confused:

It's a word almost exclusively used by angry people going on right wing rants.

Old Pio
02-15-2012, 12:39 PM
My guess is a "clever" combination of "liberal" and "******", very open minded and modern of OP. ;)

Not so clever. Just trying to keep up with ******* name calling, which evidently isn't offensive to you.

Old Pio
02-15-2012, 12:48 PM
It's a word almost exclusively used by angry people going on right wing rants.

Why is it any objection to ******* cant is inevitably described as "angry" (by *******s)? It's no more or less angry than the crap dished out by *******s all day, every day. Such as blaming Sarah Palin for what happened in Tucson. *******s also resort to the trinity, you know, "stupidity, racism and hatred" to describe anyone who stands up to them and objects.

As WFB pointed out decades ago: liberals talk about "defending to the death your right to disagree," but they're always shocked that anyone WOULD disagree.

Old Pio
02-15-2012, 12:51 PM
It's a word almost exclusively used by angry people going on right wing rants.

Anyone disagreeing with ******* orthodoxy clearly is "ranting" and "angry." My view is *******s can dish it out but can't take it.

Gurtholfin
02-15-2012, 01:01 PM
http://i820.***********.com/albums/zz128/Gurtholfin/USCHO/hanibal.jpg

I love it when a plan comes together!

:D

ScoobyDoo
02-15-2012, 01:12 PM
Is this the Cafe now? Take the political BS off the D1 board, please.

LTsatch
02-15-2012, 01:13 PM
Anyone disagreeing with ******* orthodoxy clearly is "ranting" and "angry." My view is *******s can dish it out but can't take it.

I have this crazy vision of you sitting on your adobe porch with a rifle on your lap waiting for the Mexicans to climb the border fence down there in old AZ.

Old Pio
02-15-2012, 01:16 PM
I have this crazy vision of you sitting on your adobe porch with a rifle on your lap waiting for the Mexicans to climb the border fence down there in old AZ.

That was my Christmas card this year. You forgot the Crown Royal, helps my aim.

Old Pio
02-15-2012, 01:18 PM
http://i820.***********.com/albums/zz128/Gurtholfin/USCHO/hanibal.jpg

I love it when a plan comes together!

:D

There was one episode where Hannibal delayed their getaway at the end because "I want to see the look on his face." ;)

Gurtholfin
02-15-2012, 01:27 PM
There was one episode where Hannibal delayed their getaway at the end because "I want to see the look on his face." ;)

Hannibal was badarse! :cool:

jerryj
02-15-2012, 02:20 PM
He's one of yours. And your little boy scout is STILL a punk. Gutless. Classless. And in need of having his neck snapped. Maybe next time.

mods- why hasnt this guy been banned? calling for kids paralyzation.. come on..

Old Pio
02-15-2012, 02:30 PM
mods- why hasnt this guy been banned? calling for kids paralyzation.. come on..

Try to catch up Torquemada. I withdrew the comment. Your standards are there for all to see: a while back you were arguing implicitly that JZ deserved what he got.

And here is your unbiased analysis of what happened:

by the way- here are the facts, gopher fan, DU fan, or otherwise. it was from the front, not from behind. it was not late (half second after the pass)- it was finishing a check. in the .5 seconds after the pass- rau took zero strides towards zucker. no charging. he glided into the hit. he didnt launch himself into the hit. he got his hands up- it was hands to the head. thats a 5 minute penalty. he deserved getting ejected. no suspension is necessary.

Which leaves you in a tiny minority of Gopher bunker dwellers. You are hardly in a position to criticize me or my analysis. "Glided into the hit," eh?