Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

End of Verbal Agreements??

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 8
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 template Next
  • #76
    Re: End of Verbal Agreements??

    Originally posted by willythekid View Post
    he's a canuck clown
    Your mouth open for business chump?

    Comment

    • #77
      Re: End of Verbal Agreements??

      *****http://illyaking.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/uh-oh-internet-tough-guy-here.png******
      Originally posted by JDUBBS1280 View Post
      Your mouth open for business chump?

      Comment

      • #78
        Re: End of Verbal Agreements??

        Originally posted by willythekid View Post
        *****http://illyaking.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/uh-oh-internet-tough-guy-here.png******
        Who took your portrait? It's such a good likeness of you, I assume it was a pro.

        Comment

        • #79
          Re: End of Verbal Agreements??

          Where there is smoke there's fire.....it would not surprise me one bit to see verbal agreements discontinued when conference re-alinements are complete.

          As for CHL eligibility, here's a good legal argument as to why CHLers should be allowed to play in the NCAA....

          http://law.shu.edu/Students/academic...ormatted-2.pdf

          Comment

          • #80
            Re: End of Verbal Agreements??

            Originally posted by jnacc View Post
            As for CHL eligibility, here's a good legal argument as to why CHLers should be allowed to play in the NCAA....

            http://law.shu.edu/Students/academic...ormatted-2.pdf
            This article is a must-read for anyone trying to understand the NCAA/Major Junior Hockey controversy.
            In a nutshell, the author argues that a minor (under age 18) earning the handsome sum of $35 a week for playing ice hockey on a major junior team in Canada should not be considered a professional hockey player.
            The UNH Men's Hockey Blog

            Comment

            • #81
              Re: End of Verbal Agreements??

              Originally posted by C-H-C View Post
              This article is a must-read for anyone trying to understand the NCAA/Major Junior Hockey controversy.
              In a nutshell, the author argues that a minor (under age 18) earning the handsome sum of $35 a week for playing ice hockey on a major junior team in Canada should not be considered a professional hockey player.
              Obviously the NCAA doesn't give to sh#ts what the author thinks because they are not eligible..... One would think if they had a leg to stand on it would have been challeged in court a long time ago.
              I am Tommyboy, and I approve this message.

              In Bob we Trust!

              The Herb Brooks National Hockey Center..... I wonder who originally came up with that.

              Comment

              • #82
                Re: End of Verbal Agreements??

                Originally posted by C-H-C View Post
                This article is a must-read for anyone trying to understand the NCAA/Major Junior Hockey controversy.
                In a nutshell, the author argues that a minor (under age 18) earning the handsome sum of $35 a week for playing ice hockey on a major junior team in Canada should not be considered a professional hockey player.
                As long as ANY players are on two way CHL-NHL contracts, EVERY player in the CHL will be considered a professional. It does not matter how much any specific individual player makes. I'll gladly support allowing all former CHL players full NCAA eligibility as soon as the leagues contains no players who have signed NHL contracts.

                Comment

                • #83
                  Originally posted by Almington View Post
                  As long as ANY players are on two way CHL-NHL contracts, EVERY player in the CHL will be considered a professional. It does not matter how much any specific individual player makes. I'll gladly support allowing all former CHL players full NCAA eligibility as soon as the leagues contains no players who have signed NHL contracts.
                  Bingo! Well said
                  @MNState0fHockey on Twitter
                  On the Web at www.mnhockeycentral.com
                  High School, Gophers, and Wild News on Facebook at Minnesota Hockey Central

                  Comment

                  • #84
                    Re: End of Verbal Agreements??

                    Hakstol proposes to integrate major junior and NCAA eligibility. What's next? The wisest, or at least the most vocal denizens of this forum seem to be having second thoughts about the absurdity of CHL/NCAA cooperating. Cheetos, anyone?

                    Comment

                    • #85
                      Re: End of Verbal Agreements??

                      Originally posted by Almington View Post
                      As long as ANY players are on two way CHL-NHL contracts, EVERY player in the CHL will be considered a professional. It does not matter how much any specific individual player makes. I'll gladly support allowing all former CHL players full NCAA eligibility as soon as the leagues contains no players who have signed NHL contracts.
                      Do we consider players on the U-20 national teams tainted by the hideous professional mark because they are dressing with and up against signed NHL players? No, of course the NCAA makes an exception for this.....as they should for any unsigned CHL player.

                      Comment

                      • #86
                        Re: End of Verbal Agreements??

                        Letting CHL players into the NCAA will destroy the USHL. And for that reason, it will never happen IMO.
                        @MNState0fHockey on Twitter
                        On the Web at www.mnhockeycentral.com
                        High School, Gophers, and Wild News on Facebook at Minnesota Hockey Central

                        Comment

                        • #87
                          Re: End of Verbal Agreements??

                          Originally posted by mnstate0fhockey View Post
                          Letting CHL players into the NCAA will destroy the USHL. And for that reason, it will never happen IMO.
                          The USHL will simply have to adapt. Do they not call themselves a "tier 1" Junior A league, insinuating that they are the equal of the CHL? Now you are saying they have to be protected because they in no way can compete against the big bad beast known in these parts as the CHL???

                          Comment

                          • #88
                            Originally posted by Dirty View Post
                            Yes. The awesome thing about this is now UND can be blamed for another thing when this happens. Hooray! Everything is UND's fault!

                            The idea that most of the time any school is out for anyone else but themselves is amusing.
                            UND's reputation didn't come out of nowhere. If their coach wasn't such a uncivilized dirtbag and their players weren't a bunch of goons who can't stay out of trouble on or off the ice, you wouldn't have to defend them.
                            Originally posted by SJHovey
                            Pretty sure this post, made on January 3, 2016, when UNO was 14-3-1 and #2 in the pairwise, will go down in USCHO lore as The Curse of Tipsy McStagger.
                            Originally posted by Brenthoven
                            We mourn for days after a loss, puff out our chests for a week or more after we win. We brave the cold for tailgates, our friends know not to ask about the game after a tough loss, we laugh, we cry, we BLEED hockey, specifically the maroon'n'gold. Many of us have a tattoo waiting in the wings, WHEN (not IF) the Gophers are champions again.

                            Comment

                            • #89
                              Originally posted by jnacc View Post
                              The USHL will simply have to adapt. Do they not call themselves a "tier 1" Junior A league, insinuating that they are the equal of the CHL? Now you are saying they have to be protected because they in no way can compete against the big bad beast known in these parts as the CHL???
                              I didn't say any of that. Just said that there will be (never said should be) pressure to protect the USHL.
                              @MNState0fHockey on Twitter
                              On the Web at www.mnhockeycentral.com
                              High School, Gophers, and Wild News on Facebook at Minnesota Hockey Central

                              Comment

                              • #90
                                Re: End of Verbal Agreements??

                                Originally posted by jnacc View Post
                                Do we consider players on the U-20 national teams tainted by the hideous professional mark because they are dressing with and up against signed NHL players? No, of course the NCAA makes an exception for this.....as they should for any unsigned CHL player.
                                The issue is that the players on the two way CHL-NHL contracts are PAID to play hockey in the CHL. None of the players in the WJC are paid to play in the tournament.

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 template Next
                                Working...
                                X