Tweet
Re: U Maine 2011-2012 Season (thread created when Maine was at .500) Thread
why do you say that the "goal" should have been called off?
I have JUST read the recent NCAA rule, and diamond was pushed in, and diamond fought not to be pushed.... it silly idea that he did not fight hard enough is not part of the rules
"If a player of the attacking team has been physically interfered with by the action of any defending player so as to cause the player to be in the goal crease, and the puck enters the net while the player so interfered with is still within the goal crease, the goal shall be allowed."
does this mean that "if, in the opinion of Scott Hansen, a Maine players was interfered with, but no so much as to warrant a minor penalty"???
or does it mean "if a player is interfered with... but, because Jeff Bunyon is given such wide latitude that he can disragard any of these silly suggestions, we make everyone else consider NCAA RULES..."???
diamond had two skates on the ice, he was putting on the breaks, and snow was flying... when contact was made, he lost his balance and instead of 2 skates on the ice, he had only one.... nobody can tell me that a player with only one skate on the ice, going from full speed to stopping while being pushed is trying to run a goalie.
as someone else said it, Buyon blew this call, just like he blew the Lowell goal at the garden against BU.
if any of you remember the Lucas Lawson goal against UNH, this was sort of the same scenario... Lawson was being pushed, had only one skate on the ice and Nault's centering pass deflected off lawson's skate... it is impossible to control one's skates and momentum when off balance, on one skate and being pushed by a D man.
(incdentally, Maine's D ought to take note... IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO control one's self when being pushed by a D man)
Originally posted by umainesuperfan
View Post
I have JUST read the recent NCAA rule, and diamond was pushed in, and diamond fought not to be pushed.... it silly idea that he did not fight hard enough is not part of the rules
"If a player of the attacking team has been physically interfered with by the action of any defending player so as to cause the player to be in the goal crease, and the puck enters the net while the player so interfered with is still within the goal crease, the goal shall be allowed."
does this mean that "if, in the opinion of Scott Hansen, a Maine players was interfered with, but no so much as to warrant a minor penalty"???
or does it mean "if a player is interfered with... but, because Jeff Bunyon is given such wide latitude that he can disragard any of these silly suggestions, we make everyone else consider NCAA RULES..."???
diamond had two skates on the ice, he was putting on the breaks, and snow was flying... when contact was made, he lost his balance and instead of 2 skates on the ice, he had only one.... nobody can tell me that a player with only one skate on the ice, going from full speed to stopping while being pushed is trying to run a goalie.
as someone else said it, Buyon blew this call, just like he blew the Lowell goal at the garden against BU.
if any of you remember the Lucas Lawson goal against UNH, this was sort of the same scenario... Lawson was being pushed, had only one skate on the ice and Nault's centering pass deflected off lawson's skate... it is impossible to control one's skates and momentum when off balance, on one skate and being pushed by a D man.
(incdentally, Maine's D ought to take note... IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO control one's self when being pushed by a D man)
Maybe this team has nads. What do you think?
Comment