I cant believe adding 1 school can supposivly will hurt college hockey. I mean michigan just added lacrosse yet you dont have teams folding there lacrosse programs. College hockey has abig problem that nobody wants to say because they think youll hate college hockey. Many small schools in the CCHA have used playing 2-3 schools a year as theree sole source of revenue. Why are smalll schools in the WCHA doing well why the CCHA supposively cant?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Collapse
X
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
First, quit eviscerating the English language.
Second, these schools have reasonable points- if you can only make money off two or three games a year and you're about to lose those games, you're screwed. These are not Ivy League schools with multi-billion dollar endowments; they are not major sports' schools with basketball or football programs that can keep them afloat. These are mostly small colleges with little name recognition and, in most cases, pretty small endowments. If you take away their main sources of revenue each year, they will not only not make profit, but they will begin to hemorrhage money, and thus will not be able to afford keeping their teams.
This is simple economics. I don't know why the smaller WCHA teams are doing so well with a different approach than the CCHA teams; good for them. However, as a completely neutral (and uninformed) observer from the East, I have to take issue with your assumption that since the smaller WCHA teams can build sustainable success without a handful of major money-makers per season, then so can the CCHA teams. Each team's situation is unique, and it is possible that many of the CCHA teams simply have no other avenues for making the money necessary to keep their programs around. Who knows? But if as many people are saying that some of these teams will have to fold as you make it seem, there must be some truth behind it all.
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Originally posted by kdiff77 View PostFirst, quit eviscerating the English language.
Second, these schools have reasonable points- if you can only make money off two or three games a year and you're about to lose those games, you're screwed. These are not Ivy League schools with multi-billion dollar endowments; they are not major sports' schools with basketball or football programs that can keep them afloat. These are mostly small colleges with little name recognition and, in most cases, pretty small endowments. If you take away their main sources of revenue each year, they will not only not make profit, but they will begin to hemorrhage money, and thus will not be able to afford keeping their teams.
This is simple economics. I don't know why the smaller WCHA teams are doing so well with a different approach than the CCHA teams; good for them. However, as a completely neutral (and uninformed) observer from the East, I have to take issue with your assumption that since the smaller WCHA teams can build sustainable success without a handful of major money-makers per season, then so can the CCHA teams. Each team's situation is unique, and it is possible that many of the CCHA teams simply have no other avenues for making the money necessary to keep their programs around. Who knows? But if as many people are saying that some of these teams will have to fold as you make it seem, there must be some truth behind it all.
We have a lot of other problems, so it is going to be difficult to separate the various effects in the next few years. For example, I expect a big drop in season-ticket sales this coming year after the 11th place finish this year. I know a lot of season-ticket holders who have told me that they've finally had enough, and won't be renewing. The attendance slide may already be well underway by the time the Gophers actually leave the conference.My guy is a hard-nosed hockey player who is not afraid to crash the net. Your guy is a goon who runs the goalie.
Comment
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Originally posted by kdiff77 View PostFirst, quit eviscerating the English language.
Second, these schools have reasonable points- if you can only make money off two or three games a year and you're about to lose those games, you're screwed. These are not Ivy League schools with multi-billion dollar endowments; they are not major sports' schools with basketball or football programs that can keep them afloat. These are mostly small colleges with little name recognition and, in most cases, pretty small endowments. If you take away their main sources of revenue each year, they will not only not make profit, but they will begin to hemorrhage money, and thus will not be able to afford keeping their teams.
This is simple economics. I don't know why the smaller WCHA teams are doing so well with a different approach than the CCHA teams; good for them. However, as a completely neutral (and uninformed) observer from the East, I have to take issue with your assumption that since the smaller WCHA teams can build sustainable success without a handful of major money-makers per season, then so can the CCHA teams. Each team's situation is unique, and it is possible that many of the CCHA teams simply have no other avenues for making the money necessary to keep their programs around. Who knows? But if as many people are saying that some of these teams will have to fold as you make it seem, there must be some truth behind it all.
Comment
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Originally posted by gophfan View PostHow is that the BTHC fault? Isnt that the fault of the individual schools?
As to the amount, impact, and implications of that lost revenue - that's where we start wandering into opinion territory...If you don't change the world today, how can it be any better tomorrow?
Comment
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Originally posted by MavsFan View Post....but I fear that a lot of folks in the Mankato area will no longer see MSU hockey as being in a "big-time" conference once the Gophers leave....
I normally don't get into the BT arguments, but do have to post that you have a particularly interesting point that I'm not sure I belive. Still, a great point.
Comment
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Originally posted by alfablue View PostThat's a very interesting opinion. One that I have to really think over.
I normally don't get into the BT arguments, but do have to post that you have a particularly interesting point that I'm not sure I belive. Still, a great point.
Comment
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Originally posted by Big Papa View PostBTHC hockey will be awesome! Every game will be tough! Great exposure for players! Great action for fans to watch! I can't wait!!!!
But for an MSU fan, will they see the WCHA as some kind of inferior conference now? That's a very interesting thought. My first reaction was "no way", but then I considered it, and there's a point to that, whether correct or not- it's about fan preception.
Comment
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Originally posted by MavsFan View Post. We'll not only lose the revenue from those particular games, but I fear that a lot of folks in the Mankato area will no longer see MSU hockey as being in a "big-time" conference once the Gophers leave.Slap Shot - 444 might want to consider a restraining order.
dggoddard - Minnesota is THE ELITE Program in all of college hockey.
wasmania - you have to be the very best to get ice time with the great gophers!
Comment
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Originally posted by 4four4 View PostWow, I wonder how that makes UND, DU, UMD, SCSU, CC feel. I guess the WCHA won't be big time anymore. Who knew.
How big a chunk that is and how many of them totally bail on college hockey is the question and probably varies from school to school."I went over the facts in my head, and admired how much uglier the situation had just become. Over the years I've learned that ignorance is more than just bliss. It's freaking orgasmic ecstasy".- Harry Dresden, Blood Rites
Western Michigan Bronco Hockey- 2012 Mason Cup Champions
Comment
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Originally posted by LynahFan View PostWhy does it have to be somebody's fault? Some things are just facts. The fact is that without Minnesota/Wisconsin home games, the revenue of some of the smaller WCHA teams will suffer - from the direct effect of lost revenue at those games and from the indirect effect of less overall interest in the program.
As to the amount, impact, and implications of that lost revenue - that's where we start wandering into opinion territory...
Comment
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Easy on the Ivy league. Most of their "multi-billion dollar endowment" is tied up in academic education rather than men's ice hockey, unlike North Dakota or Penn State. Could it be that smaller college hockey schools are disappearing due to the increased cost of recruiting (scholarships) and paying (salaries and benefits) college hockey players? Yup.
"I can see a whole mess of trees, but where's the forest?" - Captain Peter "Wrong Way" Peach Fuzz.
Comment
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Originally posted by 4four4 View PostWow, I wonder how that makes UND, DU, UMD, SCSU, CC feel. I guess the WCHA won't be big time anymore. Who knew."Hockey is the only tribe I belong to." --Jack Falla
"Why, as a matter of fact, I suggested starting a hockey program to Father Callahan, our president. He was downright interested until we came to the use of sticks, and then he threw up his hands. He said, 'No, that game is not for our University. Notre Dame will never endorse any game that puts a club in the hands of an Irishman.' "-- Knute Rockne: All American
Comment
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Originally posted by 4four4 View PostWow, I wonder how that makes UND, DU, UMD, SCSU, CC feel. I guess the WCHA won't be big time anymore. Who knew.
Comment
-
Re: Im sick of the BTHC fearmongering
Originally posted by Jeff_Jackson_for_Pres. View PostI think you can take DU, NoDak and CC out of that equation as I think the poster's point was an in-state rivalry with the flagship team.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXX
The reason for the talent in the west? Because MN didn't rely on Canada.
Originally posted by MN Pond HockeyMenards could have sold a lot of rope
this morning in Grand Forks if North Dakota had trees.
Comment
Comment