PDA

View Full Version : What was the most embarassing thing Friday of regionals?



GB Puck Fan
03-25-2011, 10:38 PM
What was the most embarassing thing Friday of regionals?

GB Puck Fan
03-25-2011, 11:01 PM
I voted for the Michigan goal, but the St. Louis situation - as predicted by many - is just deplorable.

I'm not saying Green Bay will sell out tomorrow, but it won't be as embarrasing. I bet there were more people at the D3 semifinals in Minneapolis than in Scotttrade.

UMICH
03-26-2011, 02:57 AM
The ten-minute review was obtuse but it was the right call. If I didn't dislike the Husker-Rejects so much I'd feel bad for the way they lost. That being said :p:p:p:p:p

JF_Gophers
03-26-2011, 11:18 AM
I voted other. Some of the posters on D-1 were pretty embarassing.

7&7
04-04-2011, 01:05 PM
Attendance was really bad, they would've been better off hosting it any where else, they could have gotten 5 times the attendance in detroit or st.paul and comparable or slightly higher attendance at any local arena in minnesota

satyking
04-04-2011, 08:07 PM
The Mich goal was wrong....I believe it was in BUT the rule is inconclusive evidence and I saw none, after 2-3 min they should have dropped it and continued the game......these regionals need to get into college hockey areas, this year was a joke and the next 3 Frozen 4s have no real D1 affiliation just like Anaheim.....go back to basics and give us the old schedule at the 4, 2 separate game tix on Thursday with time to go out and eat between games and if ESPN does not like it use the other championships as pressure to get it done

UMICH
04-07-2011, 02:23 AM
The Mich goal was wrong....I believe it was in BUT the rule is inconclusive evidence and I saw none, after 2-3 min they should have dropped it and continued the game......these regionals need to get into college hockey areas, this year was a joke and the next 3 Frozen 4s have no real D1 affiliation just like Anaheim.....go back to basics and give us the old schedule at the 4, 2 separate game tix on Thursday with time to go out and eat between games and if ESPN does not like it use the other championships as pressure to get it done

I'm tired of idiots saying that "It was no goal because I didn't see it in."

Open your eyes and shut-up!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRQLZ29WEVU

satyking
04-22-2011, 10:44 AM
It is not goal or no goal it is the rule and according to the rule, with no digital enhancements, there was NO INCONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE to change the call on the ice.......when you need 10 min to decide it is a joke


I'm tired of idiots saying that "It was no goal because I didn't see it in."

Open your eyes and shut-up!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRQLZ29WEVU

Jeff_Jackson_for_Pres.
04-26-2011, 10:52 AM
the rule is inconclusive evidence and I saw none,

there was NO INCONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE

I don't mean to nitpick, but the video was fairly INconclusive. What you should have said, and meant to say I'm sure, as the rule states, is conclusive evidence; there needs to be conclusive evidence to change the ruling on the ice. I agree with you that the puck went in, but the video was inconclusive (you couldn't be sure technology-wise).