Re: NCAA West Regional - 3/25, 3/26 - BC, Michigan, UNO, CC
Here's the rule:
What does "conclusive" mean? It's not defined, nor does the word appear anywhere else in the rule book. It's not a legal term. Lawyers talk in terms of "preponderance of the evidence," "clear and convincing evidence," or "beyond a reasonable doubt."
I'm biased, but I thought it was in. The overhead replay was not conclusive by itself. I think that the straight-on front shot shows it over the line; the overhead replay simply confirms that the straight-on shot did not distort the angle.
ESPN did a good job with the replay during the game, but rehashing it during the overtime intermission in Yale-Air Force, they were only showing the overhead shot, which, again, was not the best shot in my mind. I wonder if they're fanning controversy, which would be typical for them.
There would have been controversy either way. I wouldn't want to be in the ref's shoes.
Great game, and hats off to UNO. In fact, all three games have been good so far.
Here's the rule:
SECTION 60. The use of video replay is permissible in any game using either of the following procedures:
a. NCAA Championship Procedures.
1. In order to reverse an on-ice ruling, the replay must include conclusive video evidence. One of the following criteria must be met for replay to be used:
a. A puck crossing the goal line;
a. NCAA Championship Procedures.
1. In order to reverse an on-ice ruling, the replay must include conclusive video evidence. One of the following criteria must be met for replay to be used:
a. A puck crossing the goal line;
I'm biased, but I thought it was in. The overhead replay was not conclusive by itself. I think that the straight-on front shot shows it over the line; the overhead replay simply confirms that the straight-on shot did not distort the angle.
ESPN did a good job with the replay during the game, but rehashing it during the overtime intermission in Yale-Air Force, they were only showing the overhead shot, which, again, was not the best shot in my mind. I wonder if they're fanning controversy, which would be typical for them.
There would have been controversy either way. I wouldn't want to be in the ref's shoes.
Great game, and hats off to UNO. In fact, all three games have been good so far.
Comment