PDA

View Full Version : Current Eastern PWC - Comparisons Won



joecct
02-13-2011, 10:22 AM
Based on Sunday Morning's PWC table. Once the rankings come out, this will change juuusssst a bit.

Oswego - 24
Elmira - 23
Utica - 20
Geneseo - 19
Plattsburgh - 18
Norwich - 18
Manhattanville - 16
Salem St. - 16
Castleton - 14
Hobart - 12
Neumann -12
Buffalo St. - 10
Hamilton - 8
Plymouth St. - 8
Morrisville - 6
Bowdoin - 6
Curry - 6
Fitchburg St. - 5
Mass-Dartmouth - 5
Trinity - 5
Williams - 5
Middlebury - 4
Mass-Boston - 4
Colby - 1
Amherst - 1
Johnson & Wales - 1

CardsFan91
02-13-2011, 10:37 AM
Based on Sunday Morning's PWC table. Once the rankings come out, this will change juuusssst a bit.

Oswego - 24
Elmira - 23
Utica - 20
Geneseo - 19
Plattsburgh - 18
Norwich - 18
Manhattanville - 16
Salem St. - 16
Castleton - 14
Hobart - 12
Neumann -12
Buffalo St. - 10
Hamilton - 8
Plymouth St. - 8
Morrisville - 6
Bowdoin - 6
Curry - 6
Fitchburg St. - 5
Mass-Dartmouth - 5
Trinity - 5
Williams - 5
Middlebury - 4
Mass-Boston - 4
Colby - 1
Amherst - 1
Johnson & Wales - 1

Plattsburgh State is 5-6-1 vs Top 15 teams. Just sayin'.

collegehcky2
02-13-2011, 10:57 AM
Plattsburgh State is 5-6-1 vs Top 15 teams. Just sayin'.

And your point is?

Matt Rennell
02-13-2011, 11:43 AM
Everyone just needs to keep in mind that the numbers below don't have much meaning to them. It all about how the committee interprets the criteria.

For example. Team A can beat Team B 2-1 in criteria. Team A wins the win% and record vs common opponents but Team B has a much tougher SOS. This could be easily tipped in favor of Team B especially if the win% and common opps record is close.

That said, I should have this weeks projections up shortly. Hopefully Josh will follow so I can show him how wrong he is.

spwood
02-13-2011, 11:51 AM
Morrisville and Buffalo are each just 1 game over .500. I can't see either of them being ranked, which, of course, is a good thing for Plattsburgh since they are 1-3 against those two teams....

NUProf
02-13-2011, 11:55 AM
Morrisville and Buffalo are each just 1 game over .500. I can't see either of them being ranked, which, of course, is a good thing for Plattsburgh since they are 1-3 against those two teams....

Screwy system if it's better to lose to an unranked team than a ranked team. But there is much about the system that is even more silly

spwood
02-13-2011, 01:13 PM
Screwy system if it's better to lose to an unranked team than a ranked team. But there is much about the system that is even more silly

WARNING: TIC response ahead...

I'm sure the NCAA is all ears if someone has a better system...

Seriously, though, I'm not sure I like the Div I system any better....North Dakota saw themselve drop from #2 to #5 on a night they didn't even play (a Thursday) because Robert Morris lost a game to Canisius. They rocketed right back up the #2 the next day (they didn't play that night either) when Robert Morris won a game.

NUProf
02-13-2011, 01:21 PM
WARNING: TIC response ahead...

I'm sure the NCAA is all ears if someone has a better system...


I know it's TIC, but there is no fixing it because the system seems to be a better fit in other sports, and, of course, we know the official position on D3 championships is that they all have to be administered/selected/seeded from the same set of rules.

What I like the least is the "smoke filled" phone call. I just would prefer that the system be more transparent - like the way it is in DI - that system leads to some oddities, but everybody can follow the process without having to guess.

CardsFan91
02-13-2011, 01:54 PM
And your point is?

I have no point. I just threw it out there.

LakerEagleLover
02-13-2011, 01:58 PM
I have no point. I just threw it out there. +1