PDA

View Full Version : MSU-M @ SCSU WCHA Playoffs: Funny Seeing You Here



Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 16

wchaforever
03-13-2010, 02:39 PM
We're not fat:mad: :p ...anymore.

You know, you guys should have encouraged the architects to build a "people mover" like in airports so you wouldn't have to run that lap anymore.

Biddco
03-13-2010, 02:40 PM
You know, you guys should have encouraged the architects to build a "people mover" like in airports so you wouldn't have to run that lap anymore.

That's in the new arena. Its made of marble to show value.

Red Cloud
03-13-2010, 02:45 PM
If you chose to believe posting stats about the two players involved means I'm obsessed, go ahead. The truth is your fellow fan brought Marvin up and called Lamoureux a fourth liner. I simply showed that their stat lines are pretty close to one another.

What Marvin has to do with Lamoureux being called a fourth liner, of course, is still under debate.

Dude Love
03-13-2010, 02:46 PM
What Marvin has to do with Lamoureux being called a fourth liner, of course, is still under debate.

Yeah? Well...Pepsi is better than Coke!

johnnyredshoes
03-13-2010, 02:49 PM
Yeah? Well...Pepsi is better than Coke!

what about Dr. Pepper?

wchaforever
03-13-2010, 02:49 PM
Yeah? Well...Pepsi is better than Coke!

I think a more fair comparison would be to say that Marvin is Coke and Lammy is that swill that you get at Walmart with their name on it.

state of hockey
03-13-2010, 02:52 PM
Yeah? Well...Pepsi is better than Coke!

Don't be ridiculous.

Dirty
03-13-2010, 02:53 PM
What Marvin has to do with Lamoureux being called a fourth liner, of course, is still under debate.

Since johnnyredshoes implied that Mario was just an untalented hack, I thought perhaps the two players scoring lines might be considered relevant.

Red Cloud
03-13-2010, 03:07 PM
Since johnnyredshoes implied that Mario was just an untalented hack, I thought perhaps the two players scoring lines might be considered relevant.

Quite a stretch, considering that Marvin has no relation whatsoever to whether Lamoureux is a fourth liner or not.

Dude Love
03-13-2010, 03:10 PM
Quite a stretch, considering that Marvin has no relation whatsoever to whether Lamoureux is a fourth liner or not.

Maybe we should compare players that are on our fourth line.

Red Cloud
03-13-2010, 03:11 PM
Maybe we should compare players that are on our fourth line.

Now that, that would be getting somewhere.

Dirty
03-13-2010, 03:15 PM
Quite a stretch, considering that Marvin has no relation whatsoever to whether Lamoureux is a fourth liner or not.

So what would your strategy be when attempting to show that a player is not a hack who was only sent out to fight a much more talented player? I'll take it under advisement for the next time. Thanks!

Dude Love
03-13-2010, 03:15 PM
Nick Oslund has 4 goals and 5 assists! We're falling behind!!!!

Dude Love
03-13-2010, 03:16 PM
So what would your strategy be for attempting to show that a player is not a hack who was only sent out to fight a much more talented player? I'll take it under advisement for the next time. Thanks!

Is Lammy3 UND's best defensive forward?

Dirty
03-13-2010, 03:18 PM
Is Lammy3 UND's best defensive forward?

Sure, why not.

state of hockey
03-13-2010, 03:18 PM
Is Lammy3 UND's best defensive forward?

I haven't been able to see it. Then again, the Gophers don't have any offense so it is tough to tell.

Red Cloud
03-13-2010, 03:19 PM
So what would your strategy be when attempting to show that a player is not a hack who was only sent out to fight a much more talented player? I'll take it under advisement for the next time. Thanks!

Please, Mr. "I'm Not Obsessed With Aaron Marvin," show me where in that post it was said that Marvin is a "much more talented player." I'll wait.

Dirty
03-13-2010, 03:26 PM
Please, Mr. "I'm Not Obsessed With Aaron Marvin," show me where in that post it was said that Marvin is a "much more talented player." I'll wait.

I never said you did. Do you remember how this whole conversation started? When I commented on a post by johnnyredshoes. His post certainly implied that Marvin was a much more talented player and Lameoreux was nothing more than a talentless hack. I then posted the stats lines of the two players which I believed refuted the notion that Mario was nothing more than a hack.

I know you won't believe me, but my only goal in responding to his post was to defend Mario, not start another argument having to do with Marvin.

Red Cloud
03-13-2010, 03:34 PM
I never said you did. Do you remember how this whole conversation started? When I commented on a post by johnnyredshoes. His post certainly implied that Marvin was a much more talented player and Lameoreux was nothing more than a talentless hack.

Maybe you, a person not obsessed with Aaron Marvin, saw that implication, but I didn't see anything of the sort. I did see a knock on Lamoureux which caused you to pitch a nutty, however.

Dirty
03-13-2010, 03:36 PM
Maybe you, a person not obsessed with Aaron Marvin, saw that implication, but I didn't see anything of the sort. I did see a knock on Lamoureux which caused you to pitch a nutty, however.

LOL. Listing stats and then failing to explain my viewpoint is pitching a nutty. Heehee.:)