PDA

View Full Version : Computer Rankings 11/30



NUProf
11-30-2009, 08:15 AM
Here is the first complete set of computer rankings - excluded from the list are those teams that have not played 4 games (there are 5 of them). As I expected, the #1 spot goes to Salem State based on their victory over St. Norbert.

Team's records are calculated based on counting ties as half a win and half a loss, thus Norwich shows up as 3.5 wins 0.5 losses




Rank G W L Rating
1 SAL 5 4 1 760
2 OSW 9 8 1 680
3 SNB 11 9.5 1.5 657
4 WIL 4 3.5 0.5 643
5 NRW 4 3.5 0.5 641
6 PLT 9 7.5 1.5 634
7 ELM 9 7 2 619
8 CUR 6 6 0 613
9 FIT 5 3.5 1.5 604
10 STS 8 6 2 601
11 TRN 4 3 1 600
12 WSR 9 6.5 2.5 598
13 PLY 5 4 1 590
14 WRF 9 5.5 3.5 590
15 ADR 8 8 0 589
16 MID 4 2.5 1.5 588
17 WEN 6 5.5 0.5 578
18 TUF 5 2.5 2.5 573
19 GAC 8 4.5 3.5 569
20 MAR 9 5 4 564
21 WFS 4 3.5 0.5 562
22 HML 7 5.5 1.5 561
23 WST 10 5 5 557
24 UMB 4 3 1 554
25 MOR 8 3 5 554
26 UMD 6 3.5 2.5 551
27 STT 9 5 4 548
28 WEC 9 3 6 543
29 NIC 7 4.5 2.5 535
30 AMH 4 3 1 533
31 NEU 10 5 5 533
32 BAB 5 2.5 2.5 532
33 FRE 9 6 3 532
34 POT 10 5 5 528
35 WES 4 1 3 523
36 BET 8 3 5 514
37 STO 10 6.5 3.5 514
38 STJ 10 4.5 5.5 513
39 UTC 8 4.5 3.5 511
40 SKD 5 3 2 508
41 WOR 5 2 3 501
42 GEN 9 4 5 499
43 MAN 7 5 2 487
44 AMP 6 3 3 484
45 BRC 9 4 5 480
46 WSP 10 3 7 480
47 AUG 8 4.5 3.5 479
48 CLB 4 2 2 478
49 LAW 9 6 3 468
50 LKF 8 2 6 464
51 BEC 8 2.5 5.5 461
52 FPU 9 4 5 459
53 CST 4 1.5 2.5 456
54 CRT 8 3 5 451
55 HOB 10 4 6 444
56 SOM 4 1 3 426
57 CNC 11 3 8 423
58 STN 10 3.5 6.5 422
59 BFS 11 2.5 8.5 420
60 FRA 6 1.5 4.5 406
61 SNH 8 3 5 405
62 MSE 6 4 2 397
63 SUF 7 1.5 5.5 382
64 STR 8 1 7 368
65 SLV 4 1 3 362
66 CTC 4 0 4 356
67 WNE 7 0.5 6.5 353
68 J&W 5 1 4 351
69 FNL 6 2 4 333
70 LVC 9 0 9 304
71 NLD 8 0 8 302
72 CNW 9 0 9 285
73 UNE 5 0 5 275


Unranked
BOW 3 3 0
HAM 3 2 1
STA 2 1 1
NEC 3 1.5 1.5
STM 3 1 2

zamboney
11-30-2009, 08:55 AM
Outstanding stuff. Although #35 Amherst has a record of 3-1-0 not 3-2...I don't know if it would change anything dramatically. Thanks for your efforts..always interesting.

NUProf
11-30-2009, 09:08 AM
Outstanding stuff. Although #35 Amherst has a record of 3-1-0 not 3-2...I don't know if it would change anything dramatically. Thanks for your efforts..always interesting.

Fixed - made little difference - accidentally I had given Amherst a loss that belonged to USM. It makes a little difference, but not much. Thanks.

nefan
11-30-2009, 09:46 AM
Fixed - made little difference - accidentally I had given Amherst a loss that belonged to USM. It makes a little difference, but not much. Thanks.

Curry is also 6-0 not 3-1?? Probably 4-0 by your ranking as the two Div. II games prabably do not count, but still 4-0 not 3-1??

NUProf
11-30-2009, 10:33 AM
Curry is also 6-0 not 3-1?? Probably 4-0 by your ranking as the two Div. II games prabably do not count, but still 4-0 not 3-1??

Fooey, I'll check that one too. Thanks, always need to get the bugs out of the first one - That required a revision of the whole list. I do include the DII teams. I just edited my original post

I'd appreciate it if you see an error in your team's record to let me know. With Amherst, I had entered NU's win over USM as a win over Amherst and with Curry, I had just forgotten to enter the games with the DII teams, plus I had included one of their wins as a loss.

zamboney
11-30-2009, 12:01 PM
Don't worry Prof...we are as forgiving of your small errors as I am sure you were with your students. "Fooey" was I am sure always good for a few extra marks. ;)