Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

    Originally posted by Brenthoven View Post
    And Harley, Dirty already exposed ya. Don't blame the messenger.
    I did who in the what now?
    Hollywood Hair Care Tip for Infinity (Directly from Hollywood himself)
    when its minus 20 and u have to go outside.. make sure u wear a winter hat as the mohawk does not enjoy the winter weathe(r)
    Hollywood Amazingness

    Comment


    • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

      Originally posted by HarleyMC View Post
      Ok, I will check with the administrator on it and get back to you. I have no clue what the thing is with Dirty. All I know is suddenly you are thinking I have another screen name which I don't. And one more thing I don't appreciate your candor about it.
      If it's not true, why are you getting so worked up over it?

      Take the stick out. It's more fun that way.
      Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
      Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens

      Comment


      • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

        Originally posted by Brenthoven View Post
        You are correct, that second MN goal was a fluke. I stand corrected. That's still 2-2, taking out the what-ifs. And Kangas didn't have his head on a swivel, especially compared to Rieter. I expect Hellje in net tomorrow.

        And teams don't normally win with the help of own-goals, and somehow deflecting an aggressive team (like MN played tonight) without utilizing the trap (which tUMD did play in the 3rd when they had the lead, and they did it pretty well).

        From the game I saw tonight, MN wins 80% of the time. Tomorrow will be interesting with the adjustments both teams are expected to make. I could see tUMD playing more of a trap (not THE dreaded trap, but more trap-like) and taking advantage of MN's aggressiveness, which leads to more mistake opportunities (which we saw tonight in the transition game).

        I expect MN to tighten up their passing, and hopefully not be as (shall we say) "creative" in their playmaking.

        And Harley, Dirty already exposed ya. Don't blame the messenger.
        Not sure who Hellje is. Hjelle will play. We have a goalie rotation, so it is not reactionary. Kangas had some rebound troubles, but I would be shocked to see Patterson tomorrow, as would the entire GPL community.

        Please don't talk about Dirty exposing anything.

        I expect tDogs to make adjustments but not the ones you suggest. It's also one thing to watch tape and tighten up your passing, but it's another thing to go out and execute it. Mariucci was a freaking sauna tonight, though. Maybe they just need to lower the temperature a bit to get ideal ice.
        Don't you wish your blogger was hot like me?

        "I'd rather be in a porn with DHG than DG." --Dirty

        "I'm not a sex offender, I'm a sex... defender." --Biddco

        Comment


        • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

          Jockstrap = Harley?
          Where is the exposing?

          I like chocolate milk and Kate Beckinsale and Lauren Graham and Brooke Burke and Elisha Cuthbert and Eva Longoria.

          Fighting Sioux Hockey

          Comment


          • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

            Originally posted by Runninwiththedogs View Post
            Not sure who Hellje is. Hjelle will play. We have a goalie rotation, so it is not reactionary. Kangas had some rebound troubles, but I would be shocked to see Patterson tomorrow, as would the entire GPL community.

            Please don't talk about Dirty exposing anything.

            I expect tDogs to make adjustments but not the ones you suggest. It's also one thing to watch tape and tighten up your passing, but it's another thing to go out and execute it. Mariucci was a freaking sauna tonight, though. Maybe they just need to lower the temperature a bit to get ideal ice.
            Sorry for the mis-spell.

            I know it's not reactionary, but well, we've seen weirder things concerning goalies in this camp.

            Yep, it's definitely execution. I agree, for real. I was surprised at the aggressiveness of the Gophers tonight, I admit, because tUMD always has been pesky and gnat-like against MN. They swarm over ya, wait until you try and swat them, then BOOM they react and score. So, being overly aggressive usually isn't the best plan.

            And yeah, the ice was a little odd tonight. Some of the bounces off the back boards were weird, too.

            Edit: vf: Harley posted something, Dirty quoted to respond, Harley deleted post, then a couple minutes later (if that) Jock posted the exact same thing word for word. Lengthy post too, and it was quick enough to not be a C&P job.
            Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
            Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens

            Comment


            • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

              Originally posted by Brenthoven View Post
              If it's not true, why are you getting so worked up over it?

              Take the stick out. It's more fun that way.
              I'm not "worked up" about anything. I simply want to clarify you're statement. "Take the stick out"? I think it's the other way around.

              Comment


              • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

                Originally posted by HarleyMC View Post
                I'm not "worked up" about anything. I simply want to clarify you're statement. "Take the stick out"? I think it's the other way around.
                Clearly your disillusioned. No sticks here. Just having fun, discussing hockey with a diehard tUMD fan. Amazing, I know.
                Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
                Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens

                Comment


                • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

                  Originally posted by Brenthoven View Post
                  Edit: vf: Harley posted something, Dirty quoted to respond, Harley deleted post, then a couple minutes later (if that) Jock posted the exact same thing word for word. Lengthy post too, and it was quick enough to not be a C&P job.
                  Nice detective work boys.
                  I like chocolate milk and Kate Beckinsale and Lauren Graham and Brooke Burke and Elisha Cuthbert and Eva Longoria.

                  Fighting Sioux Hockey

                  Comment


                  • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

                    The other way around? Does that mean put the stick in?

                    Why am I awake? Stupid work tomorrow.
                    Don't you wish your blogger was hot like me?

                    "I'd rather be in a porn with DHG than DG." --Dirty

                    "I'm not a sex offender, I'm a sex... defender." --Biddco

                    Comment


                    • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

                      Originally posted by Runninwiththedogs View Post
                      The other way around? Does that mean put the stick in?

                      Why am I awake? Stupid work tomorrow.
                      Ha ha. I have a day that involves no required activity. It's beautiful.
                      Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
                      Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens

                      Comment


                      • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

                        Legit non-fluke goals:
                        A goal is a goal. Fancy, fluke, whatever. The object of this particular game is to score more goals, that is when the puck crosses a line into the opposing teams net. UMD scored more goals than its rival this eve and was the victor. Perhaps if you want to argue you can take it up with the NCAA rules comittee and make your "Legit" goals worth 3 points, and a "fluke" goal 1 point?

                        Or we can play and not keep score, at the end of the game a judging panel will rank each team on a scale of 1 to 10 based on athleticism, speed, strength, and artistic merit. The bottom and top score will be dropped, of course, and then the scores averaged. The higher of these scores will be declared the winner.

                        Comment


                        • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

                          Originally posted by InebriatedMike View Post
                          A goal is a goal. Fancy, fluke, whatever. The object of this particular game is to score more goals, that is when the puck crosses a line into the opposing teams net. UMD scored more goals than its rival this eve and was the victor. Perhaps if you want to argue you can take it up with the NCAA rules comittee and make your "Legit" goals worth 3 points, and a "fluke" goal 1 point?

                          Or we can play and not keep score, at the end of the game a judging panel will rank each team on a scale of 1 to 10 based on athleticism, speed, strength, and artistic merit. The bottom and top score will be dropped, of course, and then the scores averaged. The higher of these scores will be declared the winner.
                          That would work just fine and dandy until the Russians pay off the French Judges to vote with them.
                          bueller: Why is the sunset good? Why are boobs good? Why does Positrack work? Why does Ferris lose on the road and play dead at home?

                          It just happens.


                          nmupiccdiva: I'm sorry I missed you this weekend! I thought I saw you at the football game, but I didn't want to go up to a complete stranger and ask "are you Monster?" and have it not be you!

                          leswp1: you need the Monster to fix you

                          Life is active, find Balance!massage therapy Ann Arbor

                          Comment


                          • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

                            Originally posted by InebriatedMike View Post
                            A goal is a goal. Fancy, fluke, whatever. The object of this particular game is to score more goals, that is when the puck crosses a line into the opposing teams net. UMD scored more goals than its rival this eve and was the victor. Perhaps if you want to argue you can take it up with the NCAA rules comittee and make your "Legit" goals worth 3 points, and a "fluke" goal 1 point?

                            Or we can play and not keep score, at the end of the game a judging panel will rank each team on a scale of 1 to 10 based on athleticism, speed, strength, and artistic merit. The bottom and top score will be dropped, of course, and then the scores averaged. The higher of these scores will be declared the winner.
                            A penchant for the dramatic, eh?

                            As was stated in the full context of my ranting and raving, you play out the game tonight 10 times, MN will win 8. Why? Because of fluke goals. It happens. I wish MN had the luck tUMD did tonight. I think I could legitimately add 2-3 wins this season (tonight included).

                            Are they goals in the final score? Yes. But do they paint a true picture of the game tonight? No. Hence, the "fluke" designation. As the saying goes: "Better lucky than good." I'm not saying tUMD is bad, because they are not. But tonight, they were indeed more lucky than good.

                            And before you ask, I'd trade a win for the "dishonor" or whatever of being more lucky than good.
                            Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
                            Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens

                            Comment


                            • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

                              Originally posted by Brenthoven View Post

                              And before you ask, I'd trade a win for the "dishonor" or whatever of being more lucky than good.
                              You know, if you wear one of those fancy shmancy figure skating outfits with the sequins, sparklers, shear lycra, and ruffles, it just might change UMTC's luck for the good.



                              Then again, you in an outfit that hideous might just cause a Gopher or 3 to look up at you in the stands, be blinded by the light, and then be out 4 to 8 weeks because they then crashed into something while blinded by the light. EARWIG!
                              bueller: Why is the sunset good? Why are boobs good? Why does Positrack work? Why does Ferris lose on the road and play dead at home?

                              It just happens.


                              nmupiccdiva: I'm sorry I missed you this weekend! I thought I saw you at the football game, but I didn't want to go up to a complete stranger and ask "are you Monster?" and have it not be you!

                              leswp1: you need the Monster to fix you

                              Life is active, find Balance!massage therapy Ann Arbor

                              Comment


                              • Re: tUMD @ UMTC : The in-state rivalry revisited!

                                Originally posted by Brenthoven View Post
                                Edit: vf: Harley posted something, Dirty quoted to respond, Harley deleted post, then a couple minutes later (if that) Jock posted the exact same thing word for word. Lengthy post too, and it was quick enough to not be a C&P job.
                                And when did this take place? Again if I can get more information that will help. I have sent an email to the administrator to inquire about it. Believe what you want, it's really not that significant to me, but I am checking into it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X