ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

[Ralph Baer]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Sorry Ralph but Ken Schott does not allow anything he writes to be used in any media or contests unless you bow down and kiss his U know what by asking for his permission. Please remove his information from this thread. Thanks.

Anyway, they are not even in the right order so that disqualifies them .

Sorry.

[Brett Gobe]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Clarkson 2-0
RPI 2-0
Dartmouth 2-1
Cornell 2-1

[cudmud]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Clarkson: 2-0
RPI: 2-0
Dartmouth: 2-1
Cornell: 2-1

[vicb]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

The final stats with 42 contestants:

5-12	Winner	%	2-0	2-1

Clark	40	95.24%	33	7

Princ	2	4.76%	1	1

6-11				

RPI	34	80.95%	16	18

Brn	8	19.05%	0	8

7-10				

Dart	31	73.81%	8	23

Colg	11	26.19%	2	9

8-9				

Corn	17	40.48%	4	13

Unin	25	59.52%	4	21

[FlagDUDE08]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Home team won every single game 1 this time around. Interesting...

[Kepler]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Home team won every single game 1 this time around. Interesting...

Halfway there, baby.

[vicb]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

We have a 4 way tie at the top after Round 1. Here are the standings

		Contestant	First Rnd

1	47	Brett Gobe	15

	48	cudmud	15

	15	Kepler	15

	36	Muskieman	15

5	30	DrDemento	14

	12	FreshFish	14

	14	GoldenBear	14

	29	JennyRN	14

	39	QU2201	14

	38	TchrBill	14

11	23	fr.Joe	13

	5	goldenbriggsy	13

	37	hockeyplayer2015	13

	11	kdiff77	13

	34	Laker Dude	13

	42	Nate Owen USCHO	13

	6	Ralph Baer	13

18	20	97osu	12

	18	BobNY	12

	3	bothman	12

	31	DeepRed72	12

	25	hawthr	12

	32	lugnut92	12

	35	Mike Hutter	12

25	7	Dutchman	11

	26	Go Puckman	11

	33	jstadts	11

	21	LTsatch	11

	19	slumulva88	11

	41	sshablak	11

	22	Vaportrail	11

32	8	aweise	10

	16	drshoen	10

	13	engineerhockeyfan	10

	28	Rainman	10

	9	Saints#1	10

	10	StayPuftMMcu	10

38	2	ColSkate65	9

	4	FlagDUDE08	9

	43	vicb	9

41	40	Rjm7272	7

42	17	Ufan	2

[vicb]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

For the current standings see my post before this one.

OK Round 2 is ready for action. Round 2 is played EXACTLY LIKE Round 1.

You get a point for picking the correct winner of the series and a point for each correct total wins for each team. Max 2nd round point total per series is 4.

If RPI wins 2-0 and you pick them to win 2-0 you get 4 points, 1 for RPI as the winner, 2 for each RPI win and 1 for picking Harvard to not win a game.
If RPI wins 2-1 and you pick them to win 2-0 you get 3 points
If RPI wins 2-0 and you pick Harvard to win 2-1 you get 1 point
If RPI wins 2-0 and you pick Harvard to win 2-0 you get 0 points.

So here are the 2nd round matchups: PLEASE KEEP YOUR PICKS IN THIS EXACT ORDER AS IT IS EASIER FOR ME TO ENTER THESE IN MY EXCEL SPREAD SHEET TO KEEP SCORE.

#8 Cornell at #1 Quinnipiac
#7 Dartmouth at #2 Yale
#6 RPI at #3 Harvard
#5 Clarkson at #4 SLU

Example Pick

Quinnipiac 2-1
Yale 2-0
Harvard 2-0
Clarkson 2-1

You have until 7PM Friday night to get your picks in. Good luck.

[lugnut92]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Quinnipiac 2-0
Yale 2-0
RPI 2-1
Clarkson 2-1

[Saints#1]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Quinnipiac 2-0
Yale 2-0
Harvard 2-1
SLU 2-1

[LTsatch]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Cornell 2-1
Yale 2-0
Harvard 2-1
SLU 2-1

[kdiff77]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Quinnipiac 2-0
Yale 2-1
Harvard 2-0
SLU 2-1

Does anyone else feel like the league is too predictable this year?

[Saints#1]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Does anyone else feel like the league is too predictable this year?

No! LOL ... Well, I guess maybe compared to some years!

[kdiff77]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

No! LOL ... Well, I guess maybe compared to some years!

Well, each of the higher-ranked seeds won in the first round, and only one of the series went to three games. The Clarkson-SLU series is probably a total toss-up (it should be a blast), but other than that, I can't see any upsets in the quarterfinals. In previous years, I remember most matchups being completely up-in-the-air!

[Saints#1]

Re: ECAC Pick The Playoffs 2016

Well, each of the higher-ranked seeds won in the first round, and only one of the series went to three games. The Clarkson-SLU series is probably a total toss-up (it should be a blast), but other than that, I can't see any upsets in the quarterfinals. In previous years, I remember most matchups being completely up-in-the-air!

This is true! Although, the teams with the bye have typically fared better than those without the bye over the years. It makes earning that bye that much more important.