Re: Wisconsin Hockey XXXVI: Stop looking for the silver lining and ignoring the probl
I for one am not.
As I said, I was expressing doubt during that season in this thread, much to the chagrin of many. Just wasn't feeling that sense of destiny and in 05/06, the Badgers (with Elliott) were clearly the best team in the nation. The team that lost to BC was not.
I was certainly hoping that we'd win, but in 06, I was sure* we were going to win. So much so that I bought Regional and FF tickets well in advance. Even had a schedule poster dry-mounted ahead of Skate With the Badgers and had everyone sign it - never did that before and haven't since although I haven't been to SWtB since my kid got too old for it.
It's not unlike the 96-97 Packers and the 10-11 Packers.
In 96, it was a sense of destiny. Unless something odd happened, we were going to win it all. It was our time. Same with the 05/06 in hockey.
In 09, the Packers were good and on the rise, but they had to finish strong and become the hot team at the right time to become champs. They weren't obviously better than everyone else like the Packers in 96.
And making an argument based upon switching the goalie is pointless as the goalie is a part of the team. I mean, put Pavelski on the 10 team and it may change the outcome too.
* As sure as one can be when you are competing in a sport like hockey in a one game scenario - thank you posts against Cornell and BC.
Originally posted by Wisko McBadgerton
View Post
I for one am not.
As I said, I was expressing doubt during that season in this thread, much to the chagrin of many. Just wasn't feeling that sense of destiny and in 05/06, the Badgers (with Elliott) were clearly the best team in the nation. The team that lost to BC was not.
I was certainly hoping that we'd win, but in 06, I was sure* we were going to win. So much so that I bought Regional and FF tickets well in advance. Even had a schedule poster dry-mounted ahead of Skate With the Badgers and had everyone sign it - never did that before and haven't since although I haven't been to SWtB since my kid got too old for it.
It's not unlike the 96-97 Packers and the 10-11 Packers.
In 96, it was a sense of destiny. Unless something odd happened, we were going to win it all. It was our time. Same with the 05/06 in hockey.
In 09, the Packers were good and on the rise, but they had to finish strong and become the hot team at the right time to become champs. They weren't obviously better than everyone else like the Packers in 96.
And making an argument based upon switching the goalie is pointless as the goalie is a part of the team. I mean, put Pavelski on the 10 team and it may change the outcome too.
* As sure as one can be when you are competing in a sport like hockey in a one game scenario - thank you posts against Cornell and BC.
Comment