I am sure this has been a topic of discussion before in this forum, however I would like to get some input. Maybe some of you have heard rumors of such an expansion of the current 16 team NCAA bracket. Do you think D-1 hockey could support a larger tournament? In your opinion would it hurt the sport or help the sport? and what number of teams if expanded would you like to see?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Possibility of Expanding The NCAA tourney
Collapse
X
-
Re: The Possibility of Expanding The NCAA tourney
This is so dumb I haven't even heard rumors about this. Think about that for a minute.Originally posted by reBlurthe sober Trivino I know is not a guy who would force his way into a girl's room and attempt to rape her. I can't imagine him ever making anyone even feel uncomfortable when he's sober.There are plenty of players in my time covering the team who have looked at me differently or flirted with me or the like. Trivino has never been one of those players. Even outside of the rink, he'll say hi and is plenty of friendly, but has never been even close to saying or doing anything inappropriate.
Comment
-
Re: The Possibility of Expanding The NCAA tourney
Originally posted by shepmitchell View PostI am sure this has been a topic of discussion before in this forum, however I would like to get some input. Maybe some of you have heard rumors of such an expansion of the current 16 team NCAA bracket. Do you think D-1 hockey could support a larger tournament? In your opinion would it hurt the sport or help the sport? and what number of teams if expanded would you like to see?Not a real doctor, nor do I play one on TV!
Clarkson 1990
Comment
-
Re: The Possibility of Expanding The NCAA tourney
Never gonna expand.
I also doubt it will contract. A 16-team setup is optimal for locations (5 total, 2 per team in the playoffs), and games per location (3). Also lets all teams play an even number of games (up to 4).Originally posted by nmupiccdiva...anyone that can start a meme like that is welcome and will fit in just fine around here.
Comment
-
Re: The Possibility of Expanding The NCAA tourney
Never going to happen and it shouldn't for many reasons; One of which that nobody talks about is the nature of the sport. It's even more difficult to predict than the NCAA basketball tournament for a reason. It takes away from what teams did over the course of the regular season to add more teams and one bad bounce and bam, your team is upset. With only one game, it's very difficult to justify any expansion in the NCAA tournament.
Comment
-
Re: The Possibility of Expanding The NCAA tourney
Originally posted by drshoen View PostThe NCAA rules don't allow a sport have more than 25% of their teams make the national tournament. Hockey has an exemption, because we currently have 59 (going to 60 next year). Until the sport adds another dozen schools, more or less, the tournament won't get bigger. And adding that many more schools would be unlikely, I think, even if ASU manages to drag a few more Western schools in.Originally posted by FlagDUDE08 View PostThey aim for 25% of the teams making it. It was a stretch to go from 12 to 16; only did it because it was a power of two, i.e. no byes. Call back when college hockey gets to 100 schools.Originally posted by mtu_huskies"We are not too far away from a national championship," said (John) Scott.
Originally posted by Brent HovenYeah, but you're my favorite hag.
Comment
-
Re: The Possibility of Expanding The NCAA tourney
Originally posted by FlagDUDE08 View PostThey aim for 25% of the teams making it. It was a stretch to go from 12 to 16; only did it because it was a power of two, i.e. no byes. Call back when college hockey gets to 100 schools.
Comment
-
Re: The Possibility of Expanding The NCAA tourney
Originally posted by CLS View PostThe other reason was to give autobids to the "minor" conferences, so the real effect was to increase from 12 to 14.
Comment
-
Re: The Possibility of Expanding The NCAA tourney
I think the only way it changes is if it slides back to 8, and the only way that happens is if they give up on regionals and go back to campus sites.
With a couple tweaks (like banning non-1s from hosting regionals), the current system is actually pretty darn good.Cornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020
Comment
-
Originally posted by shepmitchell View PostI am sure this has been a topic of discussion before in this forum, however I would like to get some input. Maybe some of you have heard rumors of such an expansion of the current 16 team NCAA bracket. Do you think D-1 hockey could support a larger tournament? In your opinion would it hurt the sport or help the sport? and what number of teams if expanded would you like to see?
Comment
-
Re: The Possibility of Expanding The NCAA tourney
Want to see some really exciting hockey in the conference tournaments where losing truly means you're done? Then get rid of the at large bids.
It would also end 12 team conferences.CCT '77 & '78
4 kids
5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)
”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
- Benjamin Franklin
Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).
I want to live forever. So far, so good.
Comment
-
Re: The Possibility of Expanding The NCAA tourney
Originally posted by joecct View PostWant to see some really exciting hockey in the conference tournaments where losing truly means you're done? Then get rid of the at large bids.
It would also end 12 team conferences.Originally posted by nmupiccdiva...anyone that can start a meme like that is welcome and will fit in just fine around here.
Comment
Comment