Re: 2015-2016 Coaching Changes
I can't speak for the school because I'm not an alum and have only had a few professional interactions with members of the faculty and administration. But I would think that the school would want their teams to succeed - maybe prominence is too strong a word. Unless women's hockey at Brown is truly becoming an afterthought. I can't answer that question.
I was really thinking of pre 2003 as an example of the school's program being prominent in women's hockey. That is why I brought up Mounsey. It's true that they have not been a factor for a long time. Some of that may have to do with programs like Clarkson and Quinnipiac coming on line but you could say that about any school - recruiting gets tougher for everyone with more competition for talent. Dartmouth may be better supported but they have been up and down the past few years as well. And their alumni network is fabulous especially in finance and entrepreneurship.
I agree that Kenneally probably has some strong relationships within the administration and the athletic department. Does that extend to admissions? He'll need their support as well. It will still go back to recruiting and how much Brown is willing to spend to support his coaching staff to find talented players and convince them to attend the school. One reason Tommy Amaker is so successful at Harvard is the support he gets from the athletic department. Another reason is that Amaker has relationships that provide him with a pipeline of talent that would ordinarily be funneled into other conferences. That is an invaluable recruiting edge for Harvard men's b-ball. Brown needs the same and then some if this new coaching staff is going to be successful.
Originally posted by ARM
View Post
I was really thinking of pre 2003 as an example of the school's program being prominent in women's hockey. That is why I brought up Mounsey. It's true that they have not been a factor for a long time. Some of that may have to do with programs like Clarkson and Quinnipiac coming on line but you could say that about any school - recruiting gets tougher for everyone with more competition for talent. Dartmouth may be better supported but they have been up and down the past few years as well. And their alumni network is fabulous especially in finance and entrepreneurship.
I agree that Kenneally probably has some strong relationships within the administration and the athletic department. Does that extend to admissions? He'll need their support as well. It will still go back to recruiting and how much Brown is willing to spend to support his coaching staff to find talented players and convince them to attend the school. One reason Tommy Amaker is so successful at Harvard is the support he gets from the athletic department. Another reason is that Amaker has relationships that provide him with a pipeline of talent that would ordinarily be funneled into other conferences. That is an invaluable recruiting edge for Harvard men's b-ball. Brown needs the same and then some if this new coaching staff is going to be successful.
Comment