How about Hobey Baker bias, will ECAC ,Hockey East ever win

[Happy]

Re: How about Hobey Baker bias, will ECAC ,Hockey East ever win

The "best league in college hockey" just saw its top three teams lose to the EZAC by a combined score of 11-4.

Oh, and another WCHA team, Wisconsin, was murdered by UMass-Lowell (of the Hockey East). What, exactly, do you have to support your contention that the WCHA is a better conference?

most hobey's, most national championships, most nhl players,

[kdiff77]

Re: How about Hobey Baker bias, will ECAC ,Hockey East ever win

Right, but THIS YEAR, what evidence is there that the WCHA is a better conference? More eliminated teams?

[SCSU Euro]

Re: How about Hobey Baker bias, will ECAC ,Hockey East ever win

Right, but THIS YEAR, what evidence is there that the WCHA is a better conference? More eliminated teams?

"Yep, 'cause in a one-game format, the title winner always = best team" - '07-'08 New York Giants

[Jon]

Re: How about Hobey Baker bias, will ECAC ,Hockey East ever win

When will the WCHA fans realize that no one cares about their "history"? Kneel before your ECAC overlords!!!

[Happy]

Re: How about Hobey Baker bias, will ECAC ,Hockey East ever win

Right, but THIS YEAR, what evidence is there that the WCHA is a better conference? More eliminated teams?

well, for one thing, very few care about the ecac. if you go to the score thread for the NC game, less people were looking at it than a regular season wcha game.

[Slap Shot]

Right, but THIS YEAR, what evidence is there that the WCHA is a better conference? More eliminated teams?

Dr: What are you talking about, he was dying for years!
Fletch: Yeah, but the end was very, very sudden.

[kdiff77]

well, for one thing, very few care about the ecac. if you go to the score thread for the NC game, less people were looking at it than a regular season wcha game.

And that means the team are worse? I don't understand your logic.

[badgerhawk]

Re: How about Hobey Baker bias, will ECAC ,Hockey East ever win

The "best league in college hockey" just saw its top three teams lose to the EZAC by a combined score of 11-4.

Oh, and another WCHA team, Wisconsin, was murdered by UMass-Lowell (of the Hockey East). What, exactly, do you have to support your contention that the WCHA is a better conference?

The best league may not necessarily have the best team. Top to bottom the WCHA is better than the ECAC.

[QUAlum2004]

The best league may not necessarily have the best team. Top to bottom the WCHA is better than the ECAC.

Sure but the ECAC has plently of teams that can go toe to toe with the WCHA.

[Golden Tuuk]

Re: How about Hobey Baker bias, will ECAC ,Hockey East ever win

Right, but for this NANOSECOND, what evidence is there that the WCHA is a better conference? More eliminated teams?

Fixed that for ya buddy.

[WildShawn]

The "best league in college hockey" just saw its top three teams lose to the EZAC by a combined score of 11-4.

Oh, and another WCHA team, Wisconsin, was murdered by UMass-Lowell (of the Hockey East). What, exactly, do you have to support your contention that the WCHA is a better conference?

And yet another, Denver, was blown out by UNH...in the NCAAs....

[kdiff77]

Fixed that for ya buddy.

Thanks; what an embarrassing typo that was! It's a good thing there are folks like you around to fix my mistakes!

[kdiff77]

Re: How about Hobey Baker bias, will ECAC ,Hockey East ever win

I'm still waiting for someone to give me any reason to think that the WCHA is better than the ECAC or Hockey East in 2012-2013. No one is talking about all-time titles, Hobeys, etc.

The WCHA is still a great conference, but this year, at least, it would seem to be inferior based on results.

[DaveStPaul]

Re: How about Hobey Baker bias, will ECAC ,Hockey East ever win

well, for one thing, very few care about the ecac. if you go to the score thread for the NC game, less people were looking at it than a regular season wcha game.

That's because they're busy counting their money.

[jericho]

Re: How about Hobey Baker bias, will ECAC ,Hockey East ever win

kdiff, it's a losing battle. When you bring up the fact that the WCHA isn't better, you get the argument "Well, we have a much better overall history in our leagues, most titles won, etc..." Then, in a year when the WCHA is doing well, you try to bring up past results, you get "history doesn't matter, this year is this year." So, which one is it?