From the USCHO "top ten" forwards to watch:
#10 - "small guy"
#9 - "just 5-foot-8 and weighs just 160 pounds"
#7 - "although smallish (5-foot-9, 170 pounds)"
#6 - "he is undersized"
#4 - "the little guy"
#3 - "just 5-foot-6 and 165 pounds"
Apparently 60% of the best forwards in DI hockey are remarkably small, since the article remarks they are small. Is this because:
1.) the author favors smaller players?
2.) talented average size and big players favor major juniors?
3.) the rules and/or style of play in DI hockey favor smaller players?
4) DI concession stands sell lo-cal nachos?
#10 - "small guy"
#9 - "just 5-foot-8 and weighs just 160 pounds"
#7 - "although smallish (5-foot-9, 170 pounds)"
#6 - "he is undersized"
#4 - "the little guy"
#3 - "just 5-foot-6 and 165 pounds"
Apparently 60% of the best forwards in DI hockey are remarkably small, since the article remarks they are small. Is this because:
1.) the author favors smaller players?
2.) talented average size and big players favor major juniors?
3.) the rules and/or style of play in DI hockey favor smaller players?
4) DI concession stands sell lo-cal nachos?
Comment