PDA

View Full Version : Big Ten Hockey Conference



Pages : [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

mnstate0fhockey
05-14-2012, 11:57 AM
Looked for a BTHC News thread, but didn't see one. So I apologize if I missed it.

@INCH: CCHA officials supervisor Steve Piotrowski will take same role with Big Ten in 2013-14. Good move.

ExileOnDaytonStreet
05-14-2012, 12:17 PM
*crosses fingers*

No shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts ......

mnstate0fhockey
05-14-2012, 12:22 PM
*crosses fingers*

no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts ......

x2

Timothy A
05-14-2012, 12:35 PM
*crosses fingers*

no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts ......

x 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

pinch
05-14-2012, 12:49 PM
An anti shootout thread.. I am in

Driftryder
05-14-2012, 01:22 PM
*crosses fingers*

No shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts ......

Agreed x 20000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0000000000000000000000

Happy
05-14-2012, 02:27 PM
*crosses fingers*

No shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts no shootouts ......


Would it be better for the Big Ten Network to have shootouts, and scheduling be more stable, or to have overtime, and have more game time. I will have to ask Barry Alverez what he wants to find out.

ExileOnDaytonStreet
05-14-2012, 05:01 PM
Barry would probably tell you the same thing any pragmatic person in charge of a hockey league will tell you:

Shootouts eliminate ties.
Morons don't have enough brainpower to process the fact that ties are a perfectly logical outcome to a game where neither team wins.
The human population consists of about 90% morons.

Ergo, shootouts are probably inevitable. But it shouldn't stop us from whining about it.

Happy
05-14-2012, 07:30 PM
I expect only Minnesota will be against shootouts.

Gurtholfin
05-14-2012, 08:01 PM
I expect only Minnesota will be against shootouts.

And since Minnesota isn't any good at any of the sports that the B1G cares about (makes them money), they will be laughed at, patted on the head, told to sit in the corner and ignored.

Gurtholfin
05-14-2012, 08:02 PM
BTW, I hate shootouts. Anytime, anywhere.

JDUBBS1280
05-14-2012, 08:17 PM
And since Minnesota isn't any good at any of the sports that the B1G cares about (makes them money), they will be laughed at, patted on the head, told to sit in the corner and ignored.

6 > Big Fat Zero

Fighting Sioux 23
05-14-2012, 09:14 PM
6 > Big Fat Zero

Wisconsin won a share of the 1942 Football National Championship (#1 according to the Helms Athletic Foundation). Of course, Wisconsin realizes that this is not the same as a real national championship and does not count it.

osualum86
05-14-2012, 09:19 PM
I am ambivalent about shootouts. If the Big Ten keeps them, I am fine. If they don't, I have no problem with that. I would actually like to see the colleges adopt the NHL overtime rules (regular season rules) where they go 4-on-4 in OT. More ice for everyone.

ExileOnDaytonStreet
05-14-2012, 09:38 PM
I am ambivalent about shootouts. If the Big Ten keeps them, I am fine. If they don't, I have no problem with that. I would actually like to see the colleges adopt the NHL overtime rules (regular season rules) where they go 4-on-4 in OT. More ice for everyone.

I don't trust you.

4four4
05-14-2012, 11:36 PM
http://www.startribune.com/sports/blogs/151460365.html

REDMEN2002
05-15-2012, 06:53 AM
Wisconsin won a share of the 1942 Football National Championship (#1 according to the Helms Athletic Foundation). Of course, Wisconsin realizes that this is not the same as a real national championship and does not count it.

I see what you did there...

JF_Gophers
05-15-2012, 06:57 AM
I don't trust you.Why would you if he went to Ohio State?

solovsfett
05-15-2012, 07:00 AM
Wisconsin won a share of the 1942 Football National Championship (#1 according to the Helms Athletic Foundation). Of course, Wisconsin realizes that this is not the same as a real national championship and does not count it.

winner!

and obviously correct, I don't know a single UW fan who counts 1942 as an NCAA championship, in fact I don't think there's even a banner for it up at Camp Randall

Tiggsy
05-15-2012, 08:15 AM
winner!

and obviously correct, I don't know a single UW fan who counts 1942 as an NCAA championship, in fact I don't think there's even a banner for it up at Camp Randall

Do we need to start another thread for this? I thought we were trying to keep the rest of them cleaned up.