Re: Minnesota Golden Gophers 2017-18 Season Thread
No. That's the one thing that's explicit in the rules: if a video review finds that a goal was scored earlier, then no goal scored during the wiped out play counts.
There is a legitimate issue of an action that's a penalty because it's dangerous (elbowing; high sticking; any number of other things) ought to be served even though the time was wiped out, but something that is a penalty only because it provides an advantage in play ought not. Keller's penalty for tripping, aside from being a weak call to begin with, was purely the latter.
Originally posted by KTDC
View Post
There is a legitimate issue of an action that's a penalty because it's dangerous (elbowing; high sticking; any number of other things) ought to be served even though the time was wiped out, but something that is a penalty only because it provides an advantage in play ought not. Keller's penalty for tripping, aside from being a weak call to begin with, was purely the latter.
Comment