
Originally Posted by
statusquo
Well, I was there, and Aveson had the puck, she never lost it, and the ref didn't see it. She blew the whistle, end of story. In the quarters against Middlebury, Middlebury was given an almost two minute 5x3.....was that not a gift? In game one vs. RIT, Fisher had the puck on her stick, in front of the goalie, and the whistle blew, because "the ref lost sight of it". In my very biased, yet honest opinion, Plattsburgh was hosed this weekend, because RIT was supposed to win...for two reasons. They were hosting, and they were going to make this earth shattering big announcement that they were going DI next year. How would the NCAA look, if an at large team, beat the host team in the semi-finals, a team that has been approved to move to DI? I think it would have made them look stupid. Therefore they insured that this did not happen. How else can you explain the no-goal, even after being reviewed, which by all accounts was a goal, to be waived off?
Is this sour grapes? Yep! Absolutely, and I think deservedly so.
Regarding East vs. West....Plattsburgh had to kill off 5 penalties, while GAC only had to kill off one. Plattsburgh's shots on goal were only four less than GAC, despite being a player down for 10 minutes. Plattsburgh dominated GAC 5x5 and the two power play goals by GAC being the difference in this being close vs. this being a train wreck of a game for GAC. Also, how much of a gift was the "interference" penalty in the final 90 seconds of the game for GAC??? Interference??? Really??? That happens ALL THE TIME. and to call it at that point of the game was a big, big box wrapped with a big red bow!!! Plattsburgh found a way to overcome and tie it up, and win it in OT. What gifts exactly are you talking about?