Page 4 of 51 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 1001

Thread: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

  1. #61
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Posts
    197

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Priceless View Post
    Hmmm there is a discrepancy between sites.

    Not sure where the difference is...
    Comparing the PWR Details for Minnesota, USCHO seems to have a different RPI for Minnesota, such that Miami wins the comparison. Digging into the RPI details, it looks like USCHO isn't dropping the wins over Sacred Heart (see also USCHO RPI and CHN RPI).

    I don't know if they know something we don't or are messing up.
    Last edited by JimDahl; 01-23-2012 at 08:31 AM.

  2. #62
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    26,194

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by streaker View Post
    Funny thing about that is the W hosting both western regions and probably would be favored to come out of them.
    I wouldn't bet on MN to advance out of their region unless they figure out how to do something other than split every effing weekend.

  3. #63

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Bakunin View Post
    I wouldn't bet on MN to advance out of their region unless they figure out how to do something other than split every effing weekend.
    Agreed. Minnesota has been far too inconsistent over the past two months to be a legitimate threat for the National Title. Obviously, there are two months left for the Gophers to correct that. They have the tools to do so, and I think it is just a mental hurdle that they need to pass before they are a legit title contender.
    North Dakota
    National Champions: 1959, 1963, 1980, 1982, 1987, 1997, 2000

  4. #64
    MN Hockey Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Eden Prairie, MN
    Posts
    3,460

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Interesting fact. The Gophers have never won their conference the same year they won an NCAA national championship. They have always gotten hot at the right time at the end of the season. This Gopher team has the talent to win it all, they just need to be more consistent (as previously mentioned).

    WCHA Records of the National Championship Teams
    1974 14-9-2 2nd place
    1976 18-13-1 3rd place
    1979 20-11-1 2nd place
    2002 18-7-3 3rd place
    2003 15-6-7 2nd place

  5. #65
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    3,454

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Bakunin View Post
    I wouldn't bet on MN to advance out of their region unless they figure out how to do something other than split every effing weekend.
    With MN hosting, I see very little chance of them being upset before the Frozen Four.
    That community is already in the process of dissolution where each man begins to eye his neighbor as a possible enemy, where non-conformity with the accepted creed, political as well as religious, is a mark of disaffection; where denunciation, without specification or backing, takes the place of evidence; where orthodoxy chokes freedom of dissent; where faith in the eventual supremacy of reason has become so timid that we dare not enter our convictions in the open lists, to win or lose.

  6. #66
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    844

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    The mid-season rationales for predicting season's-end NCAA tournament brackets are based upon mid-season teams' records - ignoring the possibility that prejudice could play a part in such predictions. In the past five or ten years how close a correlation has there been between best performing mid-season teams and NCAA playoff seeds?

  7. #67
    The Merchant of Truth
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Liverpool, NY
    Posts
    26,603

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Osorojo View Post
    The mid-season rationales for predicting season's-end NCAA tournament brackets are based upon mid-season teams' records - ignoring the possibility that prejudice could play a part in such predictions. In the past five or ten years how close a correlation has there been between best performing mid-season teams and NCAA playoff seeds?
    Obviously anything could happen, but given the system used to pick the teams is objective and chances of things happening can be predicted based upon the KRACH predictor, probably about 75% of the time you don't see a correlation is when there is an auto-bid involved.
    It was an honor to present your colors, RPI. Let's Go 'TUTE!
    May 14th, 2011, 11:00 PM ET: 2147483647

    USCHO Poser of the Year Championships: 2011, 2012, 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by Kepler View Post
    Just assume I'm being an idiot
    Quote Originally Posted by Foxton View Post
    Hey, you're actually correct.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rover View Post
    I'm not happy about it either, but Flag is correct (cue the Twilight Zone music!).
    Quote Originally Posted by French Rage View Post
    Ahh crap I agree exactly with what FlagDude said.

  8. #68
    Rodent of Unusual Size Patman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    21,391

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by FlagDUDE08 View Post
    Obviously anything could happen, but given the system used to pick the teams is objective and chances of things happening can be predicted based upon the KRACH predictor, probably about 75% of the time you don't see a correlation is when there is an auto-bid involved.
    More to the point... what do we have that could be better? Not much. Its not a perfect situation and if there are changes in chemistry etc that can't be handled in a model (especially with sparse data)... but, its often better than going on a straight hunch.
    BS UML '04, PhD UConn '09

    Jerseys I would like to have:
    Skating Friar Jersey
    AIC Yellowjacket Jersey w/ Yellowjacket logo on front
    UAF Jersey w/ Polar Bear on Front
    Army Black Knight logo jersey


    NCAA Men's Division 1 Simulation Primer

  9. #69
    The Merchant of Truth
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Liverpool, NY
    Posts
    26,603

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Patman View Post
    More to the point... what do we have that could be better? Not much. Its not a perfect situation and if there are changes in chemistry etc that can't be handled in a model (especially with sparse data)... but, its often better than going on a straight hunch.
    And it certainly beats not being able to be mostly accurate because of committee votes (like some other sports out there ).
    It was an honor to present your colors, RPI. Let's Go 'TUTE!
    May 14th, 2011, 11:00 PM ET: 2147483647

    USCHO Poser of the Year Championships: 2011, 2012, 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by Kepler View Post
    Just assume I'm being an idiot
    Quote Originally Posted by Foxton View Post
    Hey, you're actually correct.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rover View Post
    I'm not happy about it either, but Flag is correct (cue the Twilight Zone music!).
    Quote Originally Posted by French Rage View Post
    Ahh crap I agree exactly with what FlagDude said.

  10. #70
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    844

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by FlagDUDE08 View Post
    Obviously anything could happen, but given the system used to pick the teams is objective and chances of things happening can be predicted based upon the KRACH predictor, probably about 75% of the time you don't see a correlation is when there is an auto-bid involved.
    Thanks, I neglected to account for the auto-bid team(s)! Still, the chance of "things happening" - like the second half of the season - bemuse me when I see predictions made at or before the season's halfway over. I'm not sure I understand the accuracy of the KRACH predictor. Does it ( at midseason) correctly predict the NCAA tournament seeding of non-autobid teams only 25% of the time, or is it correct 75% of the time?

  11. #71
    Road Warrior Priceless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    30,247

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Osorojo View Post
    The mid-season rationales for predicting season's-end NCAA tournament brackets are based upon mid-season teams' records - ignoring the possibility that prejudice could play a part in such predictions. In the past five or ten years how close a correlation has there been between best performing mid-season teams and NCAA playoff seeds?
    I have the pairwise data since 2003, taken at key points throughout the season, and mid-January teams in the Pairwise end up in the field 79.4% of the time. The top 8 seeds have made the tournament 64 of 72 times (88.9%) and no #1 or #2 in the mid-January rankings has ever failed to make the field. Of the top 4 overall seeds, only 2010 UMD (#3) and 2004 St Cloud (#4) have failed to make the field.

  12. #72
    The Merchant of Truth
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Liverpool, NY
    Posts
    26,603

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Osorojo View Post
    Thanks, I neglected to account for the auto-bid team(s)! Still, the chance of "things happening" - like the second half of the season - bemuse me when I see predictions made at or before the season's halfway over. I'm not sure I understand the accuracy of the KRACH predictor. Does it ( at midseason) correctly predict the NCAA tournament seeding of non-autobid teams only 25% of the time, or is it correct 75% of the time?
    KRACH has nothing to do with tournament teams. The only thing KRACH does is to help predict, based upon past performances, who is the most likely to win a specific game. If you'd like information on tournament teams, PWR is the way to go. Obviously the stats change from game to game, but unless some team really goes to heck or a team around the bubble really starts to get hot, not much changes. I don't know what the percentages are, though. The "bubble" should be very large at this point since we still have two months worth of games to be played (playoffs DEFINITELY count toward the PWR), but it will get smaller the closer we get to the end of March.
    It was an honor to present your colors, RPI. Let's Go 'TUTE!
    May 14th, 2011, 11:00 PM ET: 2147483647

    USCHO Poser of the Year Championships: 2011, 2012, 2013

    Quote Originally Posted by Kepler View Post
    Just assume I'm being an idiot
    Quote Originally Posted by Foxton View Post
    Hey, you're actually correct.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rover View Post
    I'm not happy about it either, but Flag is correct (cue the Twilight Zone music!).
    Quote Originally Posted by French Rage View Post
    Ahh crap I agree exactly with what FlagDude said.

  13. #73

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    College Hockey Weekly has their Bracketology up...

    http://www.collegehockeyweekly.com/C..._Pairwise.html

    Also, here is their forecast of what the tournament will look like...

    http://www.collegehockeyweekly.com/T...-Forecast.html
    North Dakota
    National Champions: 1959, 1963, 1980, 1982, 1987, 1997, 2000

  14. #74
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 1999
    Posts
    197

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Priceless View Post
    I have the pairwise data since 2003, taken at key points throughout the season, and mid-January teams in the Pairwise end up in the field 79.4% of the time. The top 8 seeds have made the tournament 64 of 72 times (88.9%) and no #1 or #2 in the mid-January rankings has ever failed to make the field. Of the top 4 overall seeds, only 2010 UMD (#3) and 2004 St Cloud (#4) have failed to make the field.
    I wrote an article (When to start looking at PWR) a couple years ago that tackled this from a different angle -- I looked at the average week-to-week movement in PWR and the average deviation of each week's ranking from the final rankings. The latter had this to say about the January PWR, "each team has been ranked an average of 3-8 slots differently on April 1 than in January over the past six years." That fits pretty well with your statistic that the top 8 in January almost always make it, and reminds us that there is still hope for those teams in the mid-20s.

  15. #75
    Killing threads since 2004
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Ramsey County Adult Detention Fac.
    Posts
    757

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Fighting Sioux 23 View Post
    Also, here is their forecast of what the tournament will look like...

    http://www.collegehockeyweekly.com/T...-Forecast.html
    5 WCHA teams making it?!?!?

  16. #76
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Thornton, NH
    Posts
    2,060

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Wow, the east is getting pounded this season with only 3 HE and 1 ECAC teams in the rankings today and in the predicted post-season, along with AFA predicted for the AHA auto-seed.

  17. #77
    Road Warrior Priceless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    30,247

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Snively65 View Post
    Wow, the east is getting pounded this season with only 3 HE and 1 ECAC teams in the rankings today and in the predicted post-season, along with AFA predicted for the AHA auto-seed.
    BU, Lowell, Merrihack, Boston College...I think that's four...

  18. #78

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by ItalianSioux View Post
    5 WCHA teams making it?!?!?


    I was a little surprised, although I know one guy who still thinks the Sioux will get a #2 seed, which I keep telling him is extremely unrealistic. Oh well...

    FWIW, Here was my ballot (one of 8 that gets tallied up, 4 points for #1 seed, 3 for #2 seed...etc.)

    #1 Seeds: Minnesota Duluth, Michigan, Boston University Notre Dame
    #2 Seeds: Ohio State, Lowell, Boston College, Minnesota
    #3 Seeds: Miami, Cornell, Ferris State, Denver
    #4 Seeds: Western Michigan, Union, Colorado College, Air Force (AHA Champ)
    North Dakota
    National Champions: 1959, 1963, 1980, 1982, 1987, 1997, 2000

  19. #79

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Priceless View Post
    BU, Lowell, Merrihack, Boston College...I think that's four...
    I think they are referring to CHW's Tourney Forecast. Merrimack is not slated to make the tournament in their forecast.
    North Dakota
    National Champions: 1959, 1963, 1980, 1982, 1987, 1997, 2000

  20. #80
    there's a good buck in that racket.
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    28,293

    Re: 2012 NCAA Tournament: Bracketology

    Quote Originally Posted by Fighting Sioux 23 View Post
    College Hockey Weekly has their Bracketology up...

    http://www.collegehockeyweekly.com/C..._Pairwise.html

    Also, here is their forecast of what the tournament will look like...

    http://www.collegehockeyweekly.com/T...-Forecast.html
    first week they did this, they had bu falling from #5 to OUT!
    now they have bu staying in and retaining their #1 seed in worcester.

    what changed?!?!?!?!
    a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •