#4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHROOM!

[Quiet Riot]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

This isn't Team USA but I am even more proud of this team than I was of last year's team

According to the RPI BC should be playing St Anselm's. Wouldn't that be nice.

[TonyTheTiger20]

According to the RPI BC should be playing St Anselm's. Wouldn't that be nice.

Well, I think BC would be playing Robert Morris, because RMU would have put up a touchdown on St. A's if they matched up in the first round lol

[Quiet Riot]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

Well, I think BC would be playing Robert Morris, because RMU would have put up a touchdown on St. A's if they matched up in the first round lol

What would the Westies have done had they had a matchup of WI vs MN in the quarter finals? 1 vs 5. they would have lost their minds.

That's what the "powers that be" did to BC last year...1 vs 5...Northeastern

[ARM]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

What would the Westies have done had they had a matchup of WI vs MN in the quarter finals? 1 vs 5. they would have lost their minds.

Minds? We're supposed to have minds?

[Leather helmet]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

What would the Westies have done had they had a matchup of WI vs MN in the quarter finals? 1 vs 5. they would have lost their minds.

That's what the "powers that be" did to BC last year...1 vs 5...Northeastern

If by 'Westies', you mean North Dakota making their annual quarterfinal jaunt to Minneapolis, every year since Moses wore short pants, except this year, you would be correct.

[pokechecker]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

What would the Westies have done had they had a matchup of WI vs MN in the quarter finals? 1 vs 5. they would have lost their minds.

That's what the "powers that be" did to BC last year...1 vs 5...Northeastern

you're still whining about that?

I'm sure you would have liked a MN/WI matchup this year, like every year you want someone to beat the top western team for you

[TonyTheTiger20]

I'm sure you would have liked a MN/WI matchup this year, like every year you want someone to beat the top western team for you

I mean, I would ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Quiet Riot]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

you're still whining about that?

I'm sure you would have liked a mn/wi matchup this year, like every year you want someone to beat the top western team for you

it's not whining...it's a point that is true.
Bc grinned and bore it.
I just wish it would have happened this year so we could see the smike from the west

[FiveHoleFrenzy]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

bc grinned

Indeed they did because Northeastern lost 4 times to bc during the regular season by an aggregate score 0f 22-6. The best they could do is come within 2 goals of bc in a game.

[Eeyore]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

What would the Westies have done had they had a matchup of WI vs MN in the quarter finals? 1 vs 5. they would have lost their minds.

That's what the "powers that be" did to BC last year...1 vs 5...Northeastern

I can't remember a single western fan that thought sending Northeastern to BC was a good idea.

[ARM]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

I can't remember a single fan from anywhere who thought Northeastern was the No. 5 team last year; I guess Quiet Riot took a while to hatch that one.

[Quiet Riot]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

I can't remember a single fan from anywhere who thought Northeastern was the No. 5 team last year; I guess Quiet Riot took a while to hatch that one.

I totally agree but the pairwise is what the NCAA goes by and they were 5.

Does anyone west think MN was #5 this year?
Me neither but that's the number they use

[Quiet Riot]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

oh ok nevermind

[Quiet Riot]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

I can't remember a single western fan that thought sending Northeastern to BC was a good idea.

Oh ok. Never mind then

[ARM]

Re: #4 BC vs. #1 Wisconsin - NCAA Semis: BadgerBadgerBadgerBadger... MUSHROOM, MUSHR

I totally agree but the pairwise is what the NCAA goes by and they were 5.

Does anyone west think MN was #5 this year?
Me neither but that's the number they use

We all thought Northeastern was No. 6 last year -- Quinnipiac was a clear No. 5. The committee claimed Northeastern was No. 7, behind Princeton, which was a mystery to most. This year, the Gophers were No. 6; St. Lawrence was No. 5. By the RPI, that is true, so I don't have a problem with it.

Anyway, they only seed the top four, so they can play around with the bottom four as it suits them, and while as fans we don't like it, they haven't made us any promises. If they ever start playing tricks with who is No. 4 versus who is No. 5 just to save travel costs, then that would be a first and a lot of people will be unhappy (excepting, of course, the fans of the team that gets moved up to No. 4 ).