Re: Minnesota Girls High School Hockey III
We could go on forever but as my final point, IMO OS does a great job promoting. IMO FHIT is doing more in the promotion area but their strength is development. The girls only program at FHIT is only 3 years old and its popularity is increasing. Some of the girls you list above also do or have done FHIT in the last couple of years or have done or are doing Potter or CADP. What I am seeing today is that girls are doing FHIT and OS or a combination of OS or FHIT and some of the other programs. In the case of girls that are doing FHIT and OS, my gut feeling is that they are doing FHIT for development and OS for exposure. Some girls are just covering all of the bases. Lots of OS Prospects and Jr. Whitecap girls do FHIT. I do know girls (or should I say their parents) that would say that they wouldn't be playing college hockey if it wasn't for FHIT. As far as how many college coaches attend FHIT, I suspect a lot but I wouldn't know that information and you'd have to ask either Stacy Anderson or Alexander Zebro. This is my final post on the matter and as you said before lets just agree that we disagree. I don't want to beat this to death because OS, FHIT and the other programs are great programs that IMO offer different things.
Originally posted by WCHFan
View Post
Comment