The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

[trixR4kids]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

That doesn't surprise me. I would actually be OK with a ban on selling edibles, though obviously you aren't going to stop people from making them at home. Most people don't know what the fook they're getting into when they scarf down an entire brownie or make firecrackers for the first time.

That's exactly why it should be legalized and made clear what the doses are/what dose you should take.

[Rover]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

Yeah. The state chambers was one of the first things I checked out Tuesday night. Was disappointed that so many local races were in the hands of the GOP. We in MN will have the near perfect set up of a talented D govern, a strong D House and a one person R majority in the Senate.

I would think that Senate advantage is on borrowed time.

[GrinCDXX]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

I would think that Senate advantage is on borrowed time.

Dems probably would have easily won it this year had it been up this election.

[joecct]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

Emergency!! Everbody to get from street!!
The invasion has started!!!

https://www.breitbart.com/border/201...es-into-texas/

[5mn_Major]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

Emergency!! Everbody to get from street!!
The invasion has started!!!

https://www.breitbart.com/border/201...es-into-texas/

What has the GOP been doing the last two years!?!

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

Emergency!! Everbody to get from street!!
The invasion has started!!!

https://www.breitbart.com/border/201...es-into-texas/

Sure was worth sending 15,000 regulars down there to help the border guards!

[The Rube]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

That doesn't surprise me. I would actually be OK with a ban on selling edibles, though obviously you aren't going to stop people from making them at home. Most people don't know what the fook they're getting into when they scarf down an entire brownie or make firecrackers for the first time.

Per the law, localities can ban sales, but not possession. It's the same deal in Colorado and other states that have gone down this road. It's fine.

Your employer can still fire you if you test positive during a random, FWIW.

One of the bigger misunderstandings of the law, btw.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

One of the bigger misunderstandings of the law, btw.

We've had a few developers at my firm get booted from particular accounts when they've pi55ed hot. Defense contractors and banksters really don't like the potheads. Interestingly, neither do the telcom giants.

The firm doesn't seem to care, as long as you're meeting your numbers.

[The Rube]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

We've had a few developers at my firm get booted from particular accounts when they've pi55ed hot. Defense contractors and banksters really don't like the potheads. Interestingly, neither do the telcom giants.

The firm doesn't seem to care, as long as you're meeting your numbers.

IMO, this is the big thing: make it federally legal, and treat it like alcohol. The obvious regulate/tax, but also on the job stuff. Some companies don't care if you have a drink at lunch, as long as you can do your job. Others say no alcohol on the clock. Either way is fine with me. The trouble is, there is no universal standard.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

IMO, this is the big thing: make it federally legal, and treat it like alcohol. The obvious regulate/tax, but also on the job stuff. Some companies don't care if you have a drink at lunch, as long as you can do your job. Others say no alcohol on the clock. Either way is fine with me. The trouble is, there is no universal standard.

I would prefer they just de-schedule MJ at the federal level, and let the states deal with it, as many already have been. If Alabama wants to keep up the old racist claptrap that weed makes black dudes wanna rape white women, and keep it banned within their borders, then let them.

[The Rube]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

I would prefer they just de-schedule MJ at the federal level, and let the states deal with it, as many already have been. If Alabama wants to keep up the old racist claptrap that weed makes black dudes wanna rape white women, and keep it banned within their borders, then let them.

That's a better way of putting it.

[Jimjamesak]

That's a better way of putting it.

It’s not, it needs to be regulated at the federal level because interstate commerce of marijuana is going to be a thing eventually, in fact it’s likely going to be a necessity at some point.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

It’s not, it needs to be regulated at the federal level because interstate commerce of marijuana is going to be a thing eventually, in fact it’s likely going to be a necessity at some point.

Baby steps, jj. This is how you get the red states to accept change.

[The Rube]

Re: The States: At Least Michigan is Better Than Indiana

It’s not, it needs to be regulated at the federal level because interstate commerce of marijuana is going to be a thing eventually, in fact it’s likely going to be a necessity at some point.

I think it's a better way of putting it, because it's going about it backwards. It's the states defying federal law, instead of federal law changing things and then letting states get narrower in definition, you know?

[joecct]

It’s not, it needs to be regulated at the federal level because interstate commerce of marijuana is going to be a thing eventually, in fact it’s likely going to be a necessity at some point.

Do the feds regulate the interstate transport of beer/wine/liquor/cigarettes?