Originally posted by GrinCDXX
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Originally posted by First Time, Long Time View PostThat's on you then.
He shouldn't have to be DQ'd to make you feel better or absolve you of responsibility in making a choice.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostIt's not entirely on me. It's not my fault the entire Republican Party is a corrupt cult."If you leave ignorance and stupidity alone, ignorance and stupidity will think it's ok."
-Gallagher
R.I.P.
Grandpa G. ~ Feb 11, 1918-Oct. 6, 1999
Grandma ~ Jan 2004
Dad ~ Nov. 4, 1958-April 21, 2008
Grandpa S. ~ June 21, 1932-November 11, 2013
Comment
-
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Originally posted by First Time, Long Time View PostYour voting choice is entirely on you.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View PostYeah, whatever. Miss the larger point. I think I am going to consider leaving it blank. Which is really ****ing me off.
Comment
-
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Originally posted by The Sicatoka View PostI'm wondering why Ellison isn't facing being DQ'd as MN AG when facing similar accusations. But ... Minnesota.
https://www.minnpost.com/glean/2018/...e-allegations/"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." George Orwell, 1984
"One does not simply walk into Mordor. Its Black Gates are guarded by more than just Orcs. There is evil there that does not sleep, and the Great Eye is ever watchful. It is a barren wasteland, riddled with fire and ash and dust, the very air you breathe is a poisonous fume." Boromir
"Good news! We have a delivery." Professor Farnsworth
Comment
-
Originally posted by SJHovey View PostJuveniles do a lot of stupid things, especially when alcohol is involved. That's why in most states they are punished differently, with the punishment frequently ending when minority status does. But that should disqualify you for a job thirty years later?
I'll admit, this is a special job, and for certain positions you maybe should be beyond reproach. But I didn't make an automatic assumption it should be a disqualifier when I heard what he was accused of, including when and the context. Just like I didn't think the accusations against Franken should automatically disqualify him for the Senate job.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rufus View PostMurkowski says already he's a no.U-A-A!!!Go!Go!GreenandGold!
Applejack Tells You How UAA Is Doing...
I spell Failure with UAF
Originally posted by UAFIceAngelBut let's be real...There are 40 some other teams and only two alaskan teams...the day one of us wins something big will be the day I transfer to UAAOriginally posted by Doyle WoodyBest sign by a visting Seawolf fan Friday went to a young man who held up a piece of white poster board that read: "YOU CAN'T SPELL FAILURE WITHOUT UAF."
Comment
-
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Originally posted by rufus View PostGod, you drink the Koolaid heavily.
First, I'd like to see your source as to the offer to go to her and interview her privately.
Second, the reason Feinstein revealed the contents of the letter is exactly article appearance. The news was already going to come out, so she informed the rest of the committee. I'd also like to see your evidence that it was Democrats and staffers on the committee who leaked it.
As for corroboration of her story, I guess you missed her classmate who said that at the time there was gossip floating around her school about this happening.
1.) That the offer to interview her privately in CA or have her testify privately was made has been reported by CNN NYT WaPo NPR NBC CBS ABC... perhaps not by media matters though.
2.) Information about the letter was reported in the press on September 12th. The same day Feinstein et al. say that information about the letter was first shared with D members of the Judiciary committee. Not anybody else. Prior to that, Ford, Feinstein and her staff, and CA Rep Anna Eshoo(D) and staff were the only ones that had access to the letter or knew of it's existence. Ford had asked for and been given assurances of confidentiality. Given that, how do you propose that the info came out from some source other than D's and/or their staffs on the 12th, a day prior to Feinstein distributing it to Justice or anyone else on the 13th?
3.) Ford's classmate has deleted her story and changed her statements.Originally posted by WiscTJKI'm with Wisko and Tim.Originally posted by Timothy AOther than Wisko McBadgerton and Badger Bob, who is universally loved by all?
Comment
-
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Originally posted by St. Clown View PostI think that has to do with a very sticky situation presented. The woman never came forward, her son did. She was contacted, said that her son's statements were true, that a video exists of the abuse, but she refuses to present it to either the authorities or to allow any member of the press to view it. Ellison, of course, is claiming that no such video exists because no such incident ever took place. This is an issue only two years old, and she's willing to talk about it but not press charges while claiming she has video evidence of the event. This is extremely troubling in terms of lending credence to her claims.
https://www.minnpost.com/glean/2018/...e-allegations/
Of course the situation is nothing like Kavanaugh's where the accuser brought this up to her therapist six years ago and (unless that part turns out to be a lie) probably didn't just bring that up just in case Kavanaugh became a SC justice 6 years later as part of some big conspiracy.Originally posted by Wisko McBadgerton View PostLast edited by trixR4kids; 09-20-2018, 03:28 PM.
Comment
-
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Originally posted by Wisko McBadgerton View Post1.) That the offer to interview her privately in CA or have her testify privately was made has been reported by CNN NYT WaPo NPR NBC CBS ABC... perhaps not by media matters though.
2.) Information about the letter was reported in the press on September 12th. The same day Feinstein et al. say that information about the letter was first shared with D members of the Judiciary committee. Not anybody else. Prior to that, Ford, Feinstein and her staff, and CA Rep Anna Eshoo(D) and staff were the only ones that had access to the letter or knew of it's existence. Ford had asked for and been given assurances of confidentiality. Given that, how do you propose that the info came out from some source other than D's and/or their staffs on the 12th, a day prior to Feinstein distributing it to Justice or anyone else on the 13th?
3.) Ford's classmate has deleted her story and changed her statements.
3) Kind of but not really. She only changed her story for the slow kids in the room. I think the rest of us were able to understand that she "knew" it happened, but didn't KNOW it happened. Her story was pretty clear to people able to form rational thoughts that based on the hearsay going around the school she trusted that it had happened, not that she witnessed it or had any actual proof it happened.
Comment
-
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Originally posted by Rover View PostBecause he's not being honest about it if it happened. If she's credible then he's lying.
Comment
-
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Originally posted by jerphisch View Post2) How did Rs know they needed a letter of support from 65 women from his past ready to go? Seems they had knowledge of SOMETHING ahead of time, so I propose that is just as likely as your scenario given the lack of actual information.
3) Kind of but not really. She only changed her story for the slow kids in the room. I think the rest of us were able to understand that she "knew" it happened, but didn't KNOW it happened. Her story was pretty clear to people able to form rational thoughts that based on the hearsay going around the school she trusted that it had happened, not that she witnessed it or had any actual proof it happened.
Comment
-
Re: Scotus 11: Will Thomas Ever Speak Again?
Originally posted by Jimjamesak View PostSource? I haven’t seen anything from our Senator beyond typical wishy washy stuff.What kind of cheese are you planning to put on top?
Comment
Comment