Re: POTUS 45.41: We Need More Tax Cuts to pay for the Tax Cut
The question that I asked is whether ever, in our history, the Court ruled that individuals are entitled to certain rights, then came back at some later point in time and decided they weren't. There are no such examples, at least that I can think of.
What you are talking about is the issue of one set of rights bumping up against another set of rights. For example, to what extent can the rights or religious freedom be infringed upon by another person's right of privacy, or whatever.
The abortion cases have always been about the women's right to choose versus the rights of the unborn child, and that's where the tug and pull always occurs. But in no instances have the courts simply said "ok, we've changed our mind. That right no longer exists."
Originally posted by alfablue
View Post
What you are talking about is the issue of one set of rights bumping up against another set of rights. For example, to what extent can the rights or religious freedom be infringed upon by another person's right of privacy, or whatever.
The abortion cases have always been about the women's right to choose versus the rights of the unborn child, and that's where the tug and pull always occurs. But in no instances have the courts simply said "ok, we've changed our mind. That right no longer exists."
Comment