Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NCAA Hockey Rules Committee Announces Changes For 2018-19
Collapse
X
-
Re: NCAA Hockey Rules Committee Announces Changes For 2018-19
Originally posted by ZedLeppelin View PostMinnesota Golden Gopher Hockey
-
Re: NCAA Hockey Rules Committee Announces Changes For 2018-19
Originally posted by D2D View PostYeah, no more shootouts!"... And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;" -- Rudyard Kipling
Comment
-
Re: NCAA Hockey Rules Committee Announces Changes For 2018-19
Originally posted by ZedLeppelin View PostWisconsin Hockey: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 WE WANT MORE!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
"Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Timothy A View PostStraight up hockey, no gimmicks, love it. I'm shocked they got this right.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Timothy A View PostStraight up hockey, no gimmicks, love it. I'm shocked they got this right.
Comment
-
Re: NCAA Hockey Rules Committee Announces Changes For 2018-19
Originally posted by Rightnut View PostI understand this argument but really you have just played 60 minutes of mostly 5 on 5 Hockey and it’s tied. What’s the point of more of the same?
I like 5-on-5 hockey and don't like any system that tries to arbitrarily force a winner, and then lumps those results together with results derived by regular rules."... And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss;" -- Rudyard Kipling
Comment
-
Re: NCAA Hockey Rules Committee Announces Changes For 2018-19
Originally posted by Rightnut View PostI understand this argument but really you have just played 60 minutes of mostly 5 on 5 Hockey and it’s tied. What’s the point of more of the same? Change it up and go to 4 on 4. It’s still “real hockey”. It happens all the time in regulation. Teams prepare for it. For overtime it’s exciting for fans and it’s more likely to get a winner. No one likes a tie.
I'm going to line up with my fellow ancients. There are many times when a tie is a just and likable result. When a gimmick is used to break such a tie, that's the unlikable outcome.
Yes, ARM -- you too are an ancient. And we can keep talking about the old days for just as long as you want.
But fear not, Rightnut. In the long run, I have no doubt that the next generation will prevail. The pro leagues, along with international play, will serve as a constant reminder that more "exciting" formats are available. Eventually College Hockey will once again succumb to the temptation.
Timeline? Obviously the new "retro" rule will be with us for at least two years, until another rulebook is released. At that point, an abrupt about face would still seem to be unlikely. But my guess is that within 10 years, one of the more exciting rules will be adopted. The only real trick will be getting all of the various conferences to agree on which tiebreaker to adopt. I do believe that the era of letting individual conferences experiment with tiebreakers is over.
Patience, Young Jedi. For better or worse, generational replacement is inevitable. You will have your day.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pgb-ohio View PostYoungster, eh?
I'm going to line up with my fellow ancients. There are many times when a tie is a just and likable result. When a gimmick is used to break such a tie, that's the unlikable outcome.
Yes, ARM -- you too are an ancient. And we can keep talking about the old days for just as long as you want.
But fear not, Rightnut. In the long run, I have no doubt that the next generation will prevail. The pro leagues, along with international play, will serve as a constant reminder that more "exciting" formats are available. Eventually College Hockey will once again succumb to the temptation.
Timeline? Obviously the new "retro" rule will be with us for at least two years, until another rulebook is released. At that point, an abrupt about face would still seem to be unlikely. But my guess is that within 10 years, one of the more exciting rules will be adopted. The only real trick will be getting all of the various conferences to agree on which tiebreaker to adopt. I do believe that the era of letting individual conferences experiment with tiebreakers is over.
Patience, Young Jedi. For better or worse, generational replacement is inevitable. You will have your day.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rightnut View PostI guess young is a matter of perspective. I can apply for AARP but I’ll take being considered young. I get your points. I just feel that the point of overtime is to get a winner. If that is the case, try something different than what was going on for the first 60 minutes that ended up in a tie.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shelfit View PostI'd rather see them extend the overtime from 5 minutes to 10 minutes and leave it 5 on 5 compared to making it four on four or 3 on 3 for 5 minutes. Or split the difference and make overtime 7 or 8 minutes.
And 2 referees and no linesmen.CCT '77 & '78
4 kids
5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)
”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
- Benjamin Franklin
Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).
I want to live forever. So far, so good.
Comment
-
Re: NCAA Hockey Rules Committee Announces Changes For 2018-19
Originally posted by shelfit View PostI'd rather see them extend the overtime from 5 minutes to 10 minutes and leave it 5 on 5 compared to making it four on four or 3 on 3 for 5 minutes. Or split the difference and make overtime 7 or 8 minutes.Minnesota Golden Gopher Hockey
Comment
-
Re: NCAA Hockey Rules Committee Announces Changes For 2018-19
Originally posted by shelfit View PostI'd rather see them extend the overtime from 5 minutes to 10 minutes and leave it 5 on 5 compared to making it four on four or 3 on 3 for 5 minutes. Or split the difference and make overtime 7 or 8 minutes.
Beyond that, half of a period just feels right. And I highly doubt it would take more time than the 5 minutes + shootout format.
Originally posted by joecct View PostWhen I was at Clarkson, it was 10 minutes 5 skaters a side. Of course we also had all minor penalties were on the penalty clock and no facemasks.
And 2 referees and no linesmen.
Originally posted by D2D View PostMinnesota high schools (boys and girls) play one 8 minute sudden death overtime, and if neither team scores the game is deemed a tie. Seems about right to me.
Comment
-
Re: NCAA Hockey Rules Committee Announces Changes For 2018-19
pgb-ohio
Minnesota plays 17 minute periods. In the sectionals and state tournament the overtime is a hybrid.
8 minutes
resurface
17 minutes
brief break
and repeat the 8/17 until somebody scores.
Most states do not play unlimited overtime. After X OT periods, they use a shootout to determine a winner.
Up until a few years ago, Rhode Island was weird. They play a 2 out of 3 final, but if a game was tied after 2 OTs, it was declared "no result" and you played another game in the series. The champion could end up 2 wins, 1 loss, and 2 ties.
New Jersey was weirder. Play a single 15 minute OT and, if tied, declare co champions. I think that changes for 18-19.CCT '77 & '78
4 kids
5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)
”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
- Benjamin Franklin
Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).
I want to live forever. So far, so good.
Comment
Comment