Originally posted by Timothy A
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?
Collapse
X
-
"The use of common sense and logic will not be tolerated and may result in fine and/or suspension."- Western Professional Hockey League By-laws. 1999-2000.
-
Originally posted by TigerFan86-87 View PostSoccer never stops. It's not a matter of getting away with anything. That's just how the game is played. TV has figured out to just run ads alongside the game like they do with NASCAR. I'm not sure what radio broadcasts of soccer games do for commercials. I can't imagine a scenario where I could ever be found listening to soccer on the radio... unless I was suffering from insomnia.Just to be clear. My disinterest in this team became of the Uni's disinterest. Without the success of the hockey team, the other teams would not be where they are. Way to pay back the hockey team. **** UAA.
Comment
-
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?
I compiled the results for the 1988-89 season as that was the last one that had 10 minute overtimes, except for CCHA conference games which were 5 minute overtimes. I also realized that I had the 2008-09 season and that I could count all overtimes for the 1975-76, 1984-85 and 1988-89 (except for CCHA games) seasons, since all overtimes were 10 minutes. Therefore, all multiple overtime games were counted as ties.
Code:Season RS games OT games won tied %OT games % won % tied 1975-76 582 65 46 19 11.17% 70.77% 29.23% includes 2 multiple OT games counted as ties 1984-85 876 115 79 36 13.13% 68.70% 31.30% includes 4 multiple OT games counted as ties 1988-89 714 92 56 36 12.89% 60.87% 39.13% includes 5 multiple OT games counted as ties w/o CCHA 1988-89 144 29 12 17 20.14% 41.38% 58.62% CCHA only 1998-99 922 144 55 89 15.62% 38.19% 61.81% 2008-09 990 205 76 129 20.71% 37.07% 62.93% 2012-13 1002 196 62 134 19.56% 31.63% 68.37% 2013-14 1003 168 55 113 16.75% 32.74% 67.26% 2014-15 1002 190 78 112 18.96% 41.05% 58.95% 2015-16 1021 219 78 141 21.45% 35.62% 64.38% 2016-17 1018 186 58 128 18.27% 31.18% 68.82% 2017-18 1016 189 72 117 18.60% 38.10% 61.90% 2012-18 6062 1148 403 745 18.94% 35.10% 64.90%
SeanWomen's Hockey East Champions 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2010
Men's NCAA Champions 2009, 1995, 1978, 1972, 1971
BU Hockey Games
BU Hockey highlights and extras
NCAA Hockey Financials
Women's Division I Longest Hockey Games
I need a kidney; looking for a donor
Comment
-
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?
Originally posted by Sean Pickett View PostI compiled the results for the 1988-89 season as that was the last one that had 10 minute overtimes, except for CCHA conference games which were 5 minute overtimes. I also realized that I had the 2008-09 season and that I could count all overtimes for the 1975-76, 1984-85 and 1988-89 (except for CCHA games) seasons, since all overtimes were 10 minutes. Therefore, all multiple overtime games were counted as ties.
Code:Season RS games OT games won tied %OT games % won % tied 1975-76 582 65 46 19 11.17% 70.77% 29.23% includes 2 multiple OT games counted as ties 1984-85 876 115 79 36 13.13% 68.70% 31.30% includes 4 multiple OT games counted as ties 1988-89 714 92 56 36 12.89% 60.87% 39.13% includes 5 multiple OT games counted as ties w/o CCHA 1988-89 144 29 12 17 20.14% 41.38% 58.62% CCHA only 1998-99 922 144 55 89 15.62% 38.19% 61.81% 2008-09 990 205 76 129 20.71% 37.07% 62.93% 2012-13 1002 196 62 134 19.56% 31.63% 68.37% 2013-14 1003 168 55 113 16.75% 32.74% 67.26% 2014-15 1002 190 78 112 18.96% 41.05% 58.95% 2015-16 1021 219 78 141 21.45% 35.62% 64.38% 2016-17 1018 186 58 128 18.27% 31.18% 68.82% 2017-18 1016 189 72 117 18.60% 38.10% 61.90% 2012-18 6062 1148 403 745 18.94% 35.10% 64.90%
SeanOriginally posted by alfablueStill bitter, eh? Gotta get over it someday. He left, and UMICH was right.Originally posted by Nick PapagiorgioI think Notre Dame should wear sparkly silver helmets to match all their runner-up trophies.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sean Pickett View PostI compiled the results for the 1988-89 season as that was the last one that had 10 minute overtimes, except for CCHA conference games which were 5 minute overtimes. I also realized that I had the 2008-09 season and that I could count all overtimes for the 1975-76, 1984-85 and 1988-89 (except for CCHA games) seasons, since all overtimes were 10 minutes. Therefore, all multiple overtime games were counted as ties.
Code:Season RS games OT games won tied %OT games % won % tied 1975-76 582 65 46 19 11.17% 70.77% 29.23% includes 2 multiple OT games counted as ties 1984-85 876 115 79 36 13.13% 68.70% 31.30% includes 4 multiple OT games counted as ties 1988-89 714 92 56 36 12.89% 60.87% 39.13% includes 5 multiple OT games counted as ties w/o CCHA 1988-89 144 29 12 17 20.14% 41.38% 58.62% CCHA only 1998-99 922 144 55 89 15.62% 38.19% 61.81% 2008-09 990 205 76 129 20.71% 37.07% 62.93% 2012-13 1002 196 62 134 19.56% 31.63% 68.37% 2013-14 1003 168 55 113 16.75% 32.74% 67.26% 2014-15 1002 190 78 112 18.96% 41.05% 58.95% 2015-16 1021 219 78 141 21.45% 35.62% 64.38% 2016-17 1018 186 58 128 18.27% 31.18% 68.82% 2017-18 1016 189 72 117 18.60% 38.10% 61.90% 2012-18 6062 1148 403 745 18.94% 35.10% 64.90%
SeanCCT '77 & '78
4 kids
5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)
”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
- Benjamin Franklin
Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).
I want to live forever. So far, so good.
Comment
-
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?
Originally posted by John J. MacInnes View PostFirst of all, you haven't seen a media timeout in the final minute. If the last one hasn't been taken by the 1:00 mark, it gets dropped.
TBF I can't confirm if this is set by the NCAA or by conferences or what.
Comment
-
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?
Originally posted by tape View PostMy understanding is that if a media timeout doesn't happen by 18:00 Hockey Time, it gets dropped. Source: it happened at a game I was working last year.
TBF I can't confirm if this is set by the NCAA or by conferences or what.
Comment
-
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?
Just my opinion but things I would like to see and why.
4 on 4 ot. it would make defensive teams come out of their shell.
Less penalties on a gentle push being checking from behind. Too often some guy dives and gets a call he doesn't deserve. (Especially Duluth.)
I'm all for protecting players but embellishment could be a stand alone call couldn't it?
Things I would be totally against.
the b1g age rule. if you want smaller programs to drop hockey, implement it and see what happens.
the "I can transfer any time I want to" proposal. see above.MTU: Three time NCAA champions.
It never get's easier, you just go faster. -Greg Lemond
Comment
-
Originally posted by manurespreader View PostJust my opinion but things I would like to see and why.
4 on 4 ot. it would make defensive teams come out of their shell.
Less penalties on a gentle push being checking from behind. Too often some guy dives and gets a call he doesn't deserve. (Especially Duluth.)
I'm all for protecting players but embellishment could be a stand alone call couldn't it?
Things I would be totally against.
the b1g age rule. if you want smaller programs to drop hockey, implement it and see what happens.
the "I can transfer any time I want to" proposal. see above.
The WCHA overtime is a good starting point for debate.CCT '77 & '78
4 kids
5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)
”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
- Benjamin Franklin
Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).
I want to live forever. So far, so good.
Comment
-
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?
Originally posted by joecct View PostIf you go to 4x4, then a win in regulation has to be worth more than a win using less than 5x5.Quinnipiac Bobcats
2023 National Champions
ECAC Regular Season Champions: 2012-13, 2014-15, 2015-16, 2018-19, 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23, 2023-24
ECAC Tournament Champions: 2016
East Regional: 2013 (Champions), 2014, 2016 (Champions), 2023 (Champions), 2024
Northeast Regional:
West Regional: 2015, 2021
Midwest Regional: 2019, 2022
Frozen Four: 2013, 2016, 2023 (Champions)
Pass complete. Lipkin has a man in front! Shot... SCORE!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by MarkEagleUSA View PostTied at end of regulation: 1 pt to each team. OT winner gets additional point.
I prefer 3-2-1.CCT '77 & '78
4 kids
5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)
”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
- Benjamin Franklin
Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).
I want to live forever. So far, so good.
Comment
-
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?
Originally posted by joecct View PostI don't like the loser point. Points have to add up. A game is worth 2 points that ends in 60 minutes has less value if it ends before 65 minutes.
I prefer 3-2-1.
Sorry, had to.
Maybe it's just me, but I see absolutely nothing wrong with a tie. Heck, I'd be OK with having a tie after 60 minutes. This whole skills contest and changing the game for overtime is plain garbage. Either have a tie, or do OTs playoff style.
Comment
-
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?
Originally posted by MarkEagleUSA View PostTied at end of regulation: 1 pt to each team. OT winner gets additional point.Originally posted by alfablueStill bitter, eh? Gotta get over it someday. He left, and UMICH was right.Originally posted by Nick PapagiorgioI think Notre Dame should wear sparkly silver helmets to match all their runner-up trophies.
Comment
-
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?
Originally posted by manurespreader View PostI'm all for protecting players but embellishment could be a stand alone call couldn't it?
Comment
-
Re: Rule Changes: Who got screwed and wants a fix?
Originally posted by WeAreNDHockey View PostThere is a stand alone rule. Diving. The rule book specifically refers to it as a "stand alone" penalty. Embellishment is called when a player is fouled, the penalty is called, but the referee decides the player tries to "sell" the penalty with too much acting. Diving is called when no foul is committed but a player acts like someone committed a penalty. In my opinion diving is not much of an issue in the college game. (I don't watch enough NHL hockey anymore to know if it is there) I think embellishing is an issue, and I'd like to see it penalized with both a 2-minute minor for embellishment AND an addition 10 minute misconduct penalty.
Comment
Comment