Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Musk also announced on Thursday that the company’s branded $500 “not-a-flamethrower” will start shipping to customers in just two weeks. Musk has faced a number of regulatory hurdles to get the product off the ground, which has led to a rather unusual delivery method.
https://www.inverse.com/article/4499...a-flamethrowerCCT '77 & '78
4 kids
5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)
”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
- Benjamin Franklin
Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).
I want to live forever. So far, so good.
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by joecct View PostSears Laws of auto repair.
If it doesn't fit, get a hammer.
If it still doesn't fit, get a bigger hammer.
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by Berkshire BU Fan View PostWith apologies to Kepler's citation of Maxwell's equations, when do you break out the silver hammer?
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by Slap Shot View PostIf you are (or were) George, John or Ringo you broke it out every time that song played on the radio and bashed it to pieces.
I also like the song because Paul pushed it all the way and I hate Paul but I like the song for the same reasons he did, and I shake my head that the other 3 didn't get it. So this song reminds me that Paul was actually onto something, sometimes, when he wasn't staring at the mirror, which helps explain why John put up with him as long as he did.Last edited by Kepler; 05-21-2018, 12:16 PM.Cornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Fluid flow in three laws:
Not enough flow? Open the valve further.
Still not enough flow? Start another pump.
Still not enough flow? < bleep > mechanical engineer designed it wrong.The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.
North Dakota Hockey:
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by Kepler View PostAs somebody not all that enamored of the Beatles, I've always thought that song was quite good. 1. Story songs are the best songs. 2. Funny songs are great as long as they're funny (and it is). 3. For a band that spent the second half of their career deeply breathing in their own farts, it is pleasingly self-deprecating about the idiocy of their fans and their fame.
I also like the song because Paul pushed it all the way and I hate Paul but I like the song for the same reasons he did, and I shake my head that the other 3 didn't get it. So this song reminds me that Paul was actually onto something, sometimes, when he wasn't staring at the mirror, which helps explain why John put up with him as long as he did.
Lennon's distaste went deeper. It was recorded shortly after a car accident left him and Yoko quite injured and therefore he wasn't in the greatest of moods. Additionally John really hated that Paul often wrote from fantasy rather from a first person perspective - even if the made up evens he depicted were ultimately meant to convey his own feelings and experiences. John really felt all art should be personal and be drawn only from one's own experiences. To each their own.
I'm not saying I agree with their criticisms but the reference to the song reminded me of the stories behind it.
btw you're not really getting what the song was about. It was basically that, "s**t happens". As in things can be going along swimmingly and then, "bang, bang" something happens or comes along (a hammer) and ruins it all.
But you have a stubborn and ill-informed narrative about the band and not sure I'll ever change that.
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by Slap Shot View PostBut you have a stubborn and ill-informed narrative about the band and not sure I'll ever change that.
For the record my only "narrative" about the Beatles is that they're a band. They did a lot of really good stuff and a lot of really lazy stuff. Too many people identified with them too strongly for there to be a reasonable discussion of how good they are until those people are dead, and we still have about 20 years to go until that happens.
Until then, they're Kanye. Love them or hate them; it's none of my affair.Last edited by Kepler; 05-21-2018, 01:00 PM.Cornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by Kepler View PostToo many people identified with them too strongly for there to be a reasonable discussion of how good they are until those people are dead, and we still have about 20 years to go until that happens.
btw - they're not even my favorite band of all time so it's not a personal thing for me. To each their own and this isn't the best thread for the topic.
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by Kepler View Post3. For a band that spent the second half of their career deeply breathing in their own farts, it is pleasingly self-deprecating about the idiocy of their fans and their fame.
Having said that, their best work by far was when they transitioned.Go Gophers!
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Le whigne
https://arstechnica.com/science/2018...h-costs/?amp=1CCT '77 & '78
4 kids
5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)
”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
- Benjamin Franklin
Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).
I want to live forever. So far, so good.
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by joecct View Post
The article makes Ariane look uncompetitive and that its complaining about it. Whereas actually SpaceX are getting pretty massive government subsidies and even then, Ariana is actually cheaper for commercial launches. Right, wrong or indifferent, what's being pointed out here is US commercial welfare. The article is either putting a spin bias on it or is at minimum poorly worded - ars technica .
"SpaceX is charging the US government 100 million dollar per launch, but launches for European customers are much cheaper." Essentially, he says, launches for the US military and NASA are subsidizing SpaceX's commercial launch business.Go Gophers!
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by 5mn_Major View PostNot quite.
The article makes Ariane look uncompetitive and that its complaining about it. Whereas actually SpaceX are getting pretty massive government subsidies and even then, Ariana is actually cheaper for commercial launches. Right, wrong or indifferent, what's being pointed out here is US commercial welfare. The article is either putting a spin bias on it or is at minimum poorly worded - ars technica .
"SpaceX is charging the US government 100 million dollar per launch, but launches for European customers are much cheaper." Essentially, he says, launches for the US military and NASA are subsidizing SpaceX's commercial launch business.Last edited by GrinCDXX; 05-22-2018, 09:40 AM.
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by 5mn_Major View Posttheir best work by far was when they transitioned.Cornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020
Comment
-
Re: Science: Everything explained by PV=nRT, F=ma=Gm(1)•m(2)/r^2
Originally posted by bigblue_dl View PostSomeone that is brilliant would be able to understand how to deal with basic automotive quality issues. They guy's cars are ****ty, because Tesla is not a manufacturing company, and that doesn't seem to be changing.
https://carbuzz.com/news/check-out-t...control-issues
https://www.greencarreports.com/news...tter-to-buyers
http://autoweek.com/article/green-ca...ssembly-issues
But, sure, he's a genius....so we should give him a pass for building a complete pile of **** car and selling it for $100k.
https://www.edmunds.com/tesla/model-...pril-2018.html
https://jalopnik.com/consumer-report...sla-1826198783Code:As of 9/21/10: As of 9/13/10: College Hockey 6 College Football 0 BTHC 4 WCHA FC: 1
Originally posted by SanTropezMay your paint thinner run dry and the fleas of a thousand camels infest your dead deer.Originally posted by bigblue_dlI don't even know how to classify magic vagina smoke babies..Originally posted by KeplerWhen the giraffes start building radio telescopes they can join too.
Comment
Comment