Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Results 101 to 103 of 103

Thread: Isn't anyone going to start a NESCAC 2017-2018 thread?

  1. #101
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    57

    Re: Isn't anyone going to start a NESCAC 2017-2018 thread?

    Does anyone know the severity of the injury to Buitenhuis? That was quite a shock to my system seeing that Hamilton lost 3-0 giving up only 9 shots on goal.

  2. #102
    Middlebury: "Three-peat Sweep!"
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,960

    Re: Isn't anyone going to start a NESCAC 2017-2018 thread?

    So sad to see the results of the past year and read these posts, but they accurately reflect the complete implosion of the men’s hockey program.

    I was at Middlebury during some of the glory years (97-01), and what’s been said about it being a premier sport for the college, an important college-community experience and a huge source of pride is completely right on. Great moments like winning the title at Norwich’s beautiful new rink, the OT NESCAC title win over Williams, the unexpected 2004 title (yes, yes, ‘congradulations’) and so on. Hockey was an important part of the Middlebury experience.

    Watching from afar, it’s hard to understand what's changed.

    Did the college intentionally deprioritise an expensive sport / one that may've required more admissions tips?

    Have the changing demographics at Middlebury – much more diverse geographically, ethnically, socio-economically, etc. – meant that a Middlebury sport that was pretty white, Northeast, prep school, is just fundamentally less appealing to students and the administration? (I’d say that during my years, hockey games attracted a wide range of students – not just rich white kids.)

    Has hockey simply been replaced by men’s basketball, which seems to draw big crowds, even though it was historically Middlebury’s weakest sport? Do townspeople go to basketball games now too? And is that simply because hockey is now so bad and basketball is doing well?

    Is it just a coaching thing, as pointed out above re Sinclair? (It’s impossible to ignore this, plus various things that were talked about during and after that Beaney sabbatical season that didn’t paint a positive picture.)

    I’m not sure what will to change exists within the college, if the hockey alums are putting pressure on the administration to fix it or if it’s just the way it is now. Regardless, another terrible season is hard to stomach.
    Middlebury hockey - "In it to win it"

    1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2004, 2005, 2006 Men's DIII NCAA Champions
    2004, 2005, 2006 Women's DIII NCAA Champions, 2000, 2001 Women's DIII National Champions

  3. #103
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    2,603

    Re: Isn't anyone going to start a NESCAC 2017-2018 thread?

    Quote Originally Posted by minnesotan in vermont View Post
    Does anyone know the severity of the injury to Buitenhuis? That was quite a shock to my system seeing that Hamilton lost 3-0 giving up only 9 shots on goal.
    Buitenhuis injured his right leg in the Bowdoin game a week ago yesterday. At the time, it did not look to be a serious injury as he was able to stretch his leg for the trainer and stayed in the game before taking himself out of the game a few minutes later.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •