Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

    Originally posted by Handyman View Post
    Kerry should have fought back on that hard. It wouldnt have hurt him in any way. He suffered from "Spineless Dem Disease" though...
    I'm glad to see this ending. A lot of the cerebral "Ivy league liberals" never learned how to street fight and they were no match for the likes of Atwater and Rove. Paradoxically, the internet is helping because it brings everyone in contact with the kind of scumbucket ratf-cking you have to deal with to win a political debate when everybody up and down the bell curve is participating. Intellectuals don't even moan about Endless September anymore, thank god. It's taken for granted that every statement not only has to be defended on the merits but also against the dimwitted rhetorical tricks the orcs deploy.

    Guys like Dukakis and Gore and Kerry froze when somebody slandered them or just outright lied. They weren't used to it; they didn't have any defense against the pure stupidity of those attacks except to look around and say "nobody's falling for this, right?" But of course millions fall for it, and if you don't come back hard those millions are convinced the loudest braying is the "truth." Mix in the right's cynical manipulation of anti-intellectuliasm to undermine the whole idea of peer-reviewed fact, and unless you can fight back you lose to the dopes.
    Last edited by Kepler; 10-18-2017, 11:36 AM.
    Cornell University
    National Champion 1967, 1970
    ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
    Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

    Comment


    • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

      Originally posted by Kepler View Post
      I'm glad to see this ending. A lot of the cerebral "Ivy league liberals" never learned how to street fight and they were no match for the likes of Atwater and Rove. Wirdly, the internet is helping because it brings everyone in contact with the kind of scumbucket ratf-cking you have to deal with to win a political debate when everybody up and down the bell curve is participating. Intellectuals don't even moan about Endless September anymore, thank god. It's taken for granted that every statement not only has to be defended on the merits but also against the dimwitted rhetorical games that partisans deploy.

      Guys like Dukakis and Gore and Kerry froze when somebody slandered them or just outright lied. They weren't used to it; they didn't have any defense against the pure stupidity of those attacks except to look around and say "nobody's falling for this, right?" But of course millions fall for it, and if you don't come back hard those millions are convinced the loudest braying is the "truth." Mix in the right's cynical manipulation of anti-intellectuliasm to undermine the whole idea of peer-reviewed fact, and unless you can fight back you lose to the dopes.
      easy to say and try to rationalize here, but at the end of the day it has to do more so with the audience.

      after all it takes two people to lie marge. one to tell the lie and another to listen to it
      a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.

      Comment


      • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

        Originally posted by mookie1995 View Post
        "you don't have a couple of email accounts and use one for fun? after all, how else you gonna get to see these and submit them every week

        what else is hotmale.com for?!?!?"
        I forgot that I have a gmail account from this board I created a decade ago. i'll use that. and phonetic spelling of my name.

        Comment


        • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

          Originally posted by alfablue View Post
          I forgot that I have a gmail account from this board I created a decade ago. i'll use that. and phonetic spelling of my name.
          I still wouldn't go anywhere near it. It's an invitation to anything from being spammed to actually being stalked and harassed. There is no reason to go anywhere near the SS, even for fun.
          Cornell University
          National Champion 1967, 1970
          ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
          Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

          Comment


          • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

            https://www.infowars.com/president-t...losive-report/

            Müller better be fired soon. Because the left has zero honor whatsoever to actually resign. They just "sidestep".

            Comment


            • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

              Originally posted by MaizeRage View Post
              He could have done a lot of things, like bother to learn the guy's name, but that's just not who the piece of **** you insist on blindly defending at every turn is.
              Who's defending him? Like dx said, some context would be helpful.

              You should call out dx, too. Wait, you won't because he's a liberal.
              Last edited by The Rube; 10-18-2017, 11:53 AM.
              Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
              Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens

              Comment


              • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

                Originally posted by Brenthoven View Post
                Who's defending him? Like dx said, some context would be helpful.
                You haven't figured it out yet? If you don't 100% agree with these idiots' cockamamie socialism, you're a racist, Trump apologist, whatever insult they want to hurl today.

                Comment


                • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

                  Originally posted by Brenthoven View Post
                  Who's defending him? Like dx said, some context would be helpful.

                  You should call out dx, too. Wait, you won't because he's a liberal.
                  Yeah, you're just asking questions

                  Comment


                  • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

                    Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                    I still wouldn't go anywhere near it. It's an invitation to anything from being spammed to actually being stalked and harassed. There is no reason to go anywhere near the SS, even for fun.
                    I lied a little for it.

                    Comment


                    • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

                      Originally posted by mookie1995 View Post
                      "you don't have a couple of email accounts and use one for fun? after all, how else you gonna get to see these and submit them every week

                      what else is hotmale.com for?!?!?"
                      I thought mookie like Asian Girls...that email says otherwise
                      "It's as if the Drumpf Administration is made up of the worst and unfunny parts of the Cleveland Browns, Washington Generals, and the alien Mon-Stars from Space Jam."
                      -aparch

                      "Scenes in "Empire Strikes Back" that take place on the tundra planet Hoth were shot on the present-day site of Ralph Engelstad Arena."
                      -INCH

                      Of course I'm a fan of the Vikings. A sick and demented Masochist of a fan, but a fan none the less.
                      -ScoobyDoo 12/17/2007

                      Comment


                      • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

                        Of course they're panning it... https://www.infowars.com/networks-ce...inton-scandal/

                        Comment


                        • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

                          Originally posted by trixR4kids View Post
                          You realize it was dx's original point, and I just agreed with it, right?
                          Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
                          Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens

                          Comment


                          • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

                            Eyes on the prize, folks. Fiscal policy is what matters. All the rest is distraction.
                            Cornell University
                            National Champion 1967, 1970
                            ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                            Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Handyman View Post
                              I thought mookie like Asian Girls...that email says otherwise
                              It's an ad

                              Not a request
                              a legend and an out of work bum look a lot alike, daddy.

                              Comment


                              • Re: POTUS 45.21 STAND for our great National Anthem

                                Originally posted by Kepler View Post
                                Eyes on the prize, folks. Fiscal policy is what matters. All the rest is distraction.
                                I'm surprised that republicans even bother going this far. Why bother taking a true statement, even one badly void of the actual context in which the speech was given? Just lie. It requires no effort, and little imagination. Just say the more we lower taxes on the rich, the better off all Americans will be. trump voters will believe it. They'll eat it up like pigs scarfing on slop at the trough. trump voters are naive or stupid or know the actual truth and don't care about anything but helping the rich get richer. That's all, it's one of those three things. So just lie. trump could nuke North Korea tomorrow and tell his minions that they were about to launch a nuke that could reach Yazoo City Mississippi. None of his supporters would doubt him.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X