POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

[Kepler]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

"You win this round, Jews."

[alfablue]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Huh?

Mookie's not sure what you are trying to get it, but it has nothing good to do with what he was replying to rover about

Pretty sure rovsie and Mookie were talking about white folk

You posted that the only difference between the two groups in Charleston is that one supported whites, the other everyone else.

These are the words you posted

one side was saying whites are superior. the other says we know that and love the darkies and want to take care of them.


where's the difference?

Which says that the difference is all about race.

And I'm pointing out that a higher difference is FOR equal rights vs AGAINST equal rights.

That's what you posted, if you posted words that you didn't mean, why did you post them?

[alfablue]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

1. I never said we're not going backwards however
2. I will argue the conditions that exist now have existed for decades
3. I don't need to explain Tchump's policies because I'm not here to defend him in any way, shape or form

What happened in VA was tragic and should make people sit up and think. Long and hard. Our President had a golden opportunity to rally the country and to make us feel better about ourselves and instead showed his true character - a gutless, hateful, spiteful POS.

None of this changes the fact we're not approaching the conditions of 1930's Germany and there's not enough parallels running deep and wide enough you can draw to counter that observation.

Ok, so you can bury your head in the sand all you want.

There's more than enough going on that people want to take legal rights away from other people just because of who they are. First of all, that has to be stopped at all costs. But if you continue to just let if go unchecked, this will get ugly.

You don't seem to want to nip this in the bud just because our economy is better than Germany. That's it. BFD.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

So, here's what I don't understand. Kep thinks I'm a flaming centrist who makes Joe Leiberman look liberal, while you guys think I make Lizzy Warren look conservative.

I'm a little confused right now...

I don't think you make Warren look conservative at all. If anything, you're obviously to the right of her on economics and drugs.

It all has to do with tone and style.

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Bannonbart, indeed. The long knives are being sharpened:

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

"All the best people. The Best!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

**** you, Trump.

[The Sicatoka]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Honestly, I'd expect Chief of Staff Gen. Kelley to oust him the same way as with 'mucci. If he doesn't he just undercut himself.

Don't screw with former Corp sergeant (turned officer/General).

Nailed it.

[Handyman]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

And Breitbart begins too turn...

I said not 2 hours ago this would happen. The racists will turn now and talk about how Trump is a Jew loving commie. They will shop a new candidate in 3 years.

Bannon just bent Trump over a barrel because in 3 years when Trump has accomplished nothing the Left is going to link him to racism and the Right is going to hate that he couldnt get anything he promised done. (and likely lead to a Dem windfall in the midterms) If the racists leave he is in trouble. He better start restricting votes now...

[ScoobyDoo]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Nailed it.

Oh, spare me. He wasn't going to go until he gave that stupid interview. He pulled a mooch. Had nothing to do with Kelley.

[Handyman]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Nailed it.

Yeah you really stepped out on a ledge to predict the same thing people have been predicting for a while now. Is the sun going to rise to more Nostradamus

[burd]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

1. I never said we're not going backwards however
2. I will argue the conditions that exist now have existed for decades
3. I don't need to explain Tchump's policies because I'm not here to defend him in any way, shape or form

What happened in VA was tragic and should make people sit up and think. Long and hard. Our President had a golden opportunity to rally the country and to make us feel better about ourselves and instead showed his true character - a gutless, hateful, spiteful POS.

None of this changes the fact we're not approaching the conditions of 1930's Germany and there's not enough parallels running deep and wide enough you can draw to counter that observation.

Makes sense to me.

[The Sicatoka]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Oh, spare me. He wasn't going to go until he gave that stupid interview. He pulled a mooch. Had nothing to do with Kelley.

Who sacked 'mucci after an untoward interview? Kelley.
Who sacked Bannon after an untoward interview? ... Kelley.

I predicted Kelley had to sack Bannon (ala 'mucci) else he'd lose his credibility. And he did. <-- Nailed it.

[The Sicatoka]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

Yeah you really stepped out on a ledge to predict the same thing people have been predicting for a while now. Is the sun going to rise to more Nostradamus

You're upset because you figured Bannon would find a way to hang on.

Marines don't like it when you break ranks. Bannon had to go.

[WeAreNDHockey]

Re: POTUS 45.17 - Section 4 of Amendment 25

We need to quit referring to these racist scumbags like the Virginia protesters as white-nationalists and just call them what they are, white supremacists. The right loves catchy phrases and slogans, like death tax, Obamacare is in a death spiral and make America great again. Responsible media need to refer to things as what they actually are. Been working at home and have had on CNN or NPR all day long and they all refer endlessly to the alt-right and white nationalists.

[ScoobyDoo]

Who sacked 'mucci after an untoward interview? Kelley.
Who sacked Bannon after an untoward interview? ... Kelley.

I predicted Kelley had to sack Bannon (ala 'mucci) else he'd lose his credibility. And he did. <-- Nailed it.

You predicted water is wet. Wheeeeee.