Re: POTUS 45.10 - Stage Two in Perpetuity
I really think you need to go back and read this part of your post and think about it for a minute.
I'm not going to waste my time by going back and checking to see if you posted "TMZ level stuff" about Obama or Clinton or anyone else, in an effort to be "fair." Frankly, I don't care if you did, and I wouldn't expect you to have done so.
Isn't that the point of political partisanship? When a Democrat is in the White House, conservatives get to take their shots, both high and low, and vice versa when a Republican occupies the seat. There is no need for conservatives here to take shots at Trump. Pretty much everything that can or should be said about him, and every link, no matter how silly, is already being made by those who lean left here. The same was true when Obama was in office. There wasn't a need for Kepler or you or others to beat the bushes looking for "TMZ level" stuff about him. There were plenty of others here doing it.
We're all "partisan hacks" for our own viewpoints, aren't we?
Originally posted by alfablue
View Post
I'm not going to waste my time by going back and checking to see if you posted "TMZ level stuff" about Obama or Clinton or anyone else, in an effort to be "fair." Frankly, I don't care if you did, and I wouldn't expect you to have done so.
Isn't that the point of political partisanship? When a Democrat is in the White House, conservatives get to take their shots, both high and low, and vice versa when a Republican occupies the seat. There is no need for conservatives here to take shots at Trump. Pretty much everything that can or should be said about him, and every link, no matter how silly, is already being made by those who lean left here. The same was true when Obama was in office. There wasn't a need for Kepler or you or others to beat the bushes looking for "TMZ level" stuff about him. There were plenty of others here doing it.
We're all "partisan hacks" for our own viewpoints, aren't we?
Comment