Page 13 of 13 FirstFirst ... 345678910111213
Results 241 to 250 of 250

Thread: Wisconsin Badgers 2017-2018

  1. #241
    Let's go RED!
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Juneau WI
    Posts
    8,882

    Re: Wisconsin Badgers 2017-2018

    19-20 recruit Dara Greig has made the Canadian U18 roster. So has Grace Shirley, the little sis of still a UW recruit as far as we know it Sophie Shirley. I would love to see both Shirleys in the Cardinal and White. UW has only 11 F for 19-20 & 20-21 on the books at this time, so there is a spot open for her.
    Wisconsin Hockey: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 WE WANT MORE!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
    "Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
    Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"

  2. #242
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    630

    Re: Wisconsin Badgers 2017-2018

    Quote Originally Posted by FiveHoleFrenzy View Post
    What your western elitism won't let you mention O'Brien from Massachusetts???
    Casey is fun to watch. Absolutely flies all over the ice. When she learns to score, watch out!

  3. #243
    Let's go RED!
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Juneau WI
    Posts
    8,882

    Re: Wisconsin Badgers 2017-2018

    Quote Originally Posted by BCAlum View Post
    Casey is fun to watch. Absolutely flies all over the ice. When she learns to score, watch out!
    Oh great, another player who will underwhelm with scoring, hopefully that is not the case. Thanks for the info.
    Wisconsin Hockey: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 WE WANT MORE!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
    "Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
    Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"

  4. #244
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    1,498
    Quote Originally Posted by Timothy A View Post
    Yeah, I fell asleep at the wheel on that one. Too new of a recruit. I shouldn't forget her because I can rub her in Grant's face if need be.
    Might want to check and see if she is ok with that first

  5. #245
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,554

    Re: Wisconsin Badgers 2017-2018

    Quote Originally Posted by ne7minder View Post
    Might want to check and see if she is ok with that first
    That was a bit of an awkward sentence he wrote...

  6. #246
    Let's go RED!
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Juneau WI
    Posts
    8,882

    Re: Wisconsin Badgers 2017-2018

    Quote Originally Posted by FiveHoleFrenzy View Post
    That was a bit of an awkward sentence he wrote...
    People who live on tunnels are so literal. You need more vitamin D. Or maybe not.
    Wisconsin Hockey: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 WE WANT MORE!
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Come to the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Originally Posted by Wisko McBadgerton:
    "Baggot says Hughes and Rockwood are centering the top two lines...
    Timothy A --> Great hockey mind... Or Greatest hockey mind?!?"

  7. #247
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Madison and Florida
    Posts
    247

    Re: Wisconsin Badgers 2017-2018

    Not sure if this is the right thread to post this or not but, I noticed that ZERO players from the WCHA were included in the NWHL draft last night. I know the usual suspects (Pankowski and Clark from UW and Pannek from UM) are not eligible because they are part of their respected national teams but, wow! Not one other eligible incoming senior from the WCHA was good enough?? hmmmm...

  8. #248
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    20

    Re: Wisconsin Badgers 2017-2018

    Quote Originally Posted by rangersrule View Post
    Not sure if this is the right thread to post this or not but, I noticed that ZERO players from the WCHA were included in the NWHL draft last night. I know the usual suspects (Pankowski and Clark from UW and Pannek from UM) are not eligible because they are part of their respected national teams but, wow! Not one other eligible incoming senior from the WCHA was good enough?? hmmmm...
    The answer to this is very simple to explain. First, If you count Sweden, Finland, USA, Canada, Switzerland, etc, many of the top WCHA seniors draft eligible are going to be playing this year with their respective countries. Second, a former Wisconsin player signed this year for $3000 yes 3K. The pay scale generally runs from 3K to 30K (Hilary Knight) which is minuscule. Getting what for the most part are midwest girls to go out east and play for peanuts is not very attractive to many girls in the WCHA. Third, the Minnesota Whitecaps. This team is as good as any and probably the best in women's hockey. Girls can stay home, pursue careers and still play college teams on the weekend at the highest level. Fourth, Europe! Many girls choose to go play in Europe to gain experience and see the world. I believe the WCHA defenseman of the year is playing in Sweden next year and Stalder is playing in China next year.

    And last, the double edge sword that did so much good may be the end. The USA Women's team getting "paid" was an amazing thing for equality and women's rights, as well as a wonderful way to bring attention to the equality situation. However, in all honesty the WHL was an avenue for some girls to continue their hockey careers as well as keep themselves relevant in the USA player pool. I believe that many players will not choose the WHL moving forward, finding it difficult to compete with a select few that will get paid year round to train. Girls making 10K to play in the WHL will have to work, and I believe the main point of the USA team getting "paid" was so they did not have to work, making it almost impossible for a WHL player not in the player pool to compete. Thus weakening the league, creating a smaller player pool of talent and perhaps putting it in danger. I hope not, women's hockey has come a long way. I wish the could make 300K a year. With no sponsors and small attendance this may have the opposite effect of what everyone thinks. Time will tell.
    Last edited by upfromtheminors; Yesterday at 01:31 PM.

  9. #249
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Madison and Florida
    Posts
    247

    Re: Wisconsin Badgers 2017-2018

    Quote Originally Posted by upfromtheminors View Post
    The answer to this is very simple to explain. First, If you count Sweden, Finland, USA, Canada, Switzerland, etc, many of the top WCHA seniors draft eligible are going to be playing this year with their respective countries. Second, a former Wisconsin player signed this year for $3000 yes 3K. The pay scale generally runs from 3K to 30K (Hilary Knight) which is minuscule. Getting what for the most part are midwest girls to go out east and play for peanuts is not very attractive to many girls in the WCHA. Third, the Minnesota Whitecaps. This team is as good as any and probably the best in women's hockey. Girls can stay home, pursue careers and still play college teams on the weekend at the highest level. Fourth, Europe! Many girls choose to go play in Europe to gain experience and see the world. I believe the WCHA defenseman of the year is playing in Sweden next year and Stalder is playing in China next year.

    And last, the double edge sword that did so much good may be the end. The USA Women's team getting "paid" was an amazing thing for equality and women's rights, as well as a wonderful way to bring attention to the equality situation. However, in all honesty the WHL was an avenue for some girls to continue their hockey careers as well as keep themselves relevant in the USA player pool. I believe that many players will not choose the WHL moving forward, finding it difficult to compete with a select few that will get paid year round to train. Girls making 10K to play in the WHL will have to work, and I believe the main point of the USA team getting "paid" was so they did not have to work, making it almost impossible for a WHL player not in the player pool to compete. Thus weakening the league, creating a smaller player pool of talent and perhaps putting it in danger. I hope not, women's hockey has come a long way. I wish the could make 300K a year. With no sponsors and small attendance this may have the opposite effect of what everyone thinks. Time will tell.
    Good observations and I agree with most of what you said. I will point out however that the only countries that centralize their national teams for the Olympics are USA and Canada. All the other countries you referenced and then some-- Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Russia, Germany, etc. don't centralized meaning that those players that are still in college all will be playing on their respective college teams this season right up until the Olympics and then again after the Olympic games are completed. With the depth the 2 power house WCHA teams have shown over the last 2 years or so one would have thought that those depth players would be chosen instead of some others picked in the draft. The point you make about mid-west players not signing with a NWHL team because they would be paid peanuts does make sense though! Players that live out east are probably easier to sign by the teams that picked them instead of wasting a draft pick on someone who won't sign anyway.

  10. #250
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Posts
    20

    Re: Wisconsin Badgers 2017-2018

    Agree on the girls from Europe not getting centralized. I kind of got sidetracked on that point and I meant to add that most of the Europeans don't have interest in the NWHL

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •