Originally posted by Kepler
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
POTUS 45.08: Suckers
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers
Originally posted by Kepler View PostSure the Trump voters would have stuck, but everybody else would have bid no trump.
No.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers
Originally posted by Kepler View PostSure the Trump voters would have stuck, but everybody else would have bid no trump.What kind of cheese are you planning to put on top?
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers
In hindsight? I think the 3rd partyers might have been swayed towards Hillary. The lesser of two evils thing going on.Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers
Originally posted by Brenthoven View PostIn hindsight? I think the 3rd partyers might have been swayed towards Hillary. The lesser of two evils thing going on.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pAkyBS8uwPQCode:As of 9/21/10: As of 9/13/10: College Hockey 6 College Football 0 BTHC 4 WCHA FC: 1
Originally posted by SanTropezMay your paint thinner run dry and the fleas of a thousand camels infest your dead deer.Originally posted by bigblue_dlI don't even know how to classify magic vagina smoke babies..Originally posted by KeplerWhen the giraffes start building radio telescopes they can join too.
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers
Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View Post
Originally posted by Brenthoven View PostIn hindsight? I think the 3rd partyers might have been swayed towards Hillary. The lesser of two evils thing going on.**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers
Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View Post
I think the Bernie fans, and the true third party folks would go with Hill, even though they might not have liked her. Why is that so shocking of a thought?Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers
Originally posted by Brenthoven View PostSeriously, what is wrong with that thought?
I think the Bernie fans, and the true third party folks would go with Hill, even though they might not have liked her. Why is that so shocking of a thought?Code:As of 9/21/10: As of 9/13/10: College Hockey 6 College Football 0 BTHC 4 WCHA FC: 1
Originally posted by SanTropezMay your paint thinner run dry and the fleas of a thousand camels infest your dead deer.Originally posted by bigblue_dlI don't even know how to classify magic vagina smoke babies..Originally posted by KeplerWhen the giraffes start building radio telescopes they can join too.
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers
Originally posted by dxmnkd316 View PostYou didn't watch the video.Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kepler View PostSure the Trump voters would have stuck, but everybody else would have bid no trump.
Supposedly a quarter of French voters didn't vote because they hated both candidates. That's what the third parties would have done.
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers
Originally posted by unofan View PostDude, that was the choice already.
Supposedly a quarter of French voters didn't vote because they hated both candidates. That's what the third parties would have done.Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brenthoven View PostBut in hindsight? If we could do it all over again? I would disagree. I think the non-voters would vote, for the most part.
Even if you personally drove each one to the voting booth with a time machine to go back six months in time, they're still going to go "meh" and walk away.“Demolish the bridges behind you… then there is no choice but to build again.”
Live Radio from 100.3
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers
Originally posted by aparch View PostNo. No they wouldnt. See: Scott Walker, Wisconsin, 2012, 2014.
Even if you personally drove each one to the voting booth with a time machine to go back six months in time, they're still going to go "meh" and walk away.Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brenthoven View PostBut in hindsight? If we could do it all over again? I would disagree. I think the non-voters would vote, for the most part.
Comment
-
Re: POTUS 45.08: Suckers
Originally posted by unofan View PostThen you have more faith in the electorate than I. Because the last year or so has simply reinforced my oft stated opinion that roughly half of Americans have below average intelligence, and average ain't exactly stellar.Never really developed a taste for tequila. Kind of hard to understand how you make a drink out of something that sharp, inhospitable. Now, bourbon is easy to understand.
Tastes like a warm summer day. -Raylan Givens
Comment
Comment