Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

    Originally posted by realet View Post
    20 out of 60 is a third, or 33% - so even if it was 20, it was still more than 20%. As it was, the number was actually 23, or 38.3%, also known as "close to twice (20%) from this past season."

    And if even if Riga was a head coach and not an assistant in the EJHL, it was still 15 years ago.
    So alumni coaches are closer to 40% then 20% does it really matter? How many of those Alumni coaches have winning records in their overall careers. Being an Alumni doesn't mean your going to be a good coach. Just like being a good recruiter doesn't mean you're going to be a good coach. They have 4 candidates with varying backgrounds hopefully the one they choose will lead this program out of the woods. As for Riga and the last time he was a HC, the length of time doesn't matter, the fact that he was a HC at a level higher than youth hockey should matter. As with Gosek as with Smith. They have the knowledge on how to construct a team, assemble practices and run a bench during a game. That's a disadvantage that Barr is at. He doesn't have that experience. It doesn't mean he isn't capable of doing it just means he's learning on the job.

    Comment


    • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

      Originally posted by Noresmen View Post
      So alumni coaches are closer to 40% then 20% does it really matter?
      Yes. It's a significant margin - and given that the other 60% of coaches come from a pool that includes literally every other school in creation, and you can see that there's a serious preference for alums. And its an understandable preference.

      How many of those Alumni coaches have winning records in their overall careers. Being an Alumni doesn't mean your going to be a good coach.
      Being an alumnus does not mean you're going to be a good coach, no. But it's certainly a bonus from a number of standpoints, including marketing. You don't think a dispirited fan base would be inspired and turn out to see the favored son return? Especially when he's one of the most sought after coaches in the entire country? Riga or Gosek both have impressive CVs, but they'll never have that kind of instant connection. Is it an intangible? Yes. But you're dismissing it out of hand.

      How many have winning records? Well, Jerry York (BC '67) is the all-time winningest coach in college hockey history. Jack Parker (BU '68) is third. Red Berenson (Michigan '62) is fourth. Rick Comley (LSSU '72) is fifth, he started out his D-I career at his alma mater for three years - in fact, taking over just two seasons after he was playing. Len Ceglarski and Jeff Sauer are 9th and 10th all time, both coached at their alma maters. That's 60% of the top 10.

      Ted Donato (Harvard '91) is in the Frozen Four with his alma mater this year. Norm Bazin (UML '94) and David Quinn (BU '89) were both one goal away from doing the same with their alma maters - which both have already done in the recent past. Enrico Blasi (Miami '94) and Bob Motzko (SCSU '87) have also taken their schools to the Frozen Four recently. Keith Allain (Yale '80) and Brad Berry (UND '02) have won recent national championships with the same school they played at - as has York. Been a while for Berenson too, but Michigan has an all-time record for consecutive NCAA appearances under his reign.

      I can go on.

      Just like being a good recruiter doesn't mean you're going to be a good coach. They have 4 candidates with varying backgrounds hopefully the one they choose will lead this program out of the woods. As for Riga and the last time he was a HC, the length of time doesn't matter, the fact that he was a HC at a level higher than youth hockey should matter. As with Gosek as with Smith. They have the knowledge on how to construct a team, assemble practices and run a bench during a game. That's a disadvantage that Barr is at. He doesn't have that experience. It doesn't mean he isn't capable of doing it just means he's learning on the job.
      This is really reaching. I'm sorry, but there are a whole host of successful coaches whose first head coaching experience was in Division I.
      Without A Peer - Full coverage of RPI Men's and Women's Hockey, with a twist of lemon.

      Without A Peer live tweets every RPI hockey game, men's and women's. Follow us at @without_a_peer on Twitter.

      Comment


      • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

        Originally posted by realet View Post
        This is really reaching. I'm sorry, but there are a whole host of successful coaches whose first head coaching experience was in Division I.
        I'm fairly certain the associated concern is that the last couple times we brought on an assistant coach, we didn't do so hot. Should this condemn an applicant? Not necessarily, but I can understand why someone wouldn't want to take that chance, lest they be considered "insane".

        Comment


        • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

          Originally posted by realet View Post
          Yes. It's a significant margin - and given that the other 60% of coaches come from a pool that includes literally every other school in creation, and you can see that there's a serious preference for alums. And its an understandable preference.



          Being an alumnus does not mean you're going to be a good coach, no. But it's certainly a bonus from a number of standpoints, including marketing. You don't think a dispirited fan base would be inspired and turn out to see the favored son return? Especially when he's one of the most sought after coaches in the entire country? Riga or Gosek both have impressive CVs, but they'll never have that kind of instant connection. Is it an intangible? Yes. But you're dismissing it out of hand.

          How many have winning records? Well, Jerry York (BC '67) is the all-time winningest coach in college hockey history. Jack Parker (BU '68) is third. Red Berenson (Michigan '62) is fourth. Rick Comley (LSSU '72) is fifth, he started out his D-I career at his alma mater for three years - in fact, taking over just two seasons after he was playing. Len Ceglarski and Jeff Sauer are 9th and 10th all time, both coached at their alma maters. That's 60% of the top 10.

          Ted Donato (Harvard '91) is in the Frozen Four with his alma mater this year. Norm Bazin (UML '94) and David Quinn (BU '89) were both one goal away from doing the same with their alma maters - which both have already done in the recent past. Enrico Blasi (Miami '94) and Bob Motzko (SCSU '87) have also taken their schools to the Frozen Four recently. Keith Allain (Yale '80) and Brad Berry (UND '02) have won recent national championships with the same school they played at - as has York. Been a while for Berenson too, but Michigan has an all-time record for consecutive NCAA appearances under his reign.

          I can go on.



          This is really reaching. I'm sorry, but there are a whole host of successful coaches whose first head coaching experience was in Division I.
          My point simply was that just because they are an Alumni doesn't mean they have the Holy Grail at their disposal. Yes there have been some fairly successful coaches that have coached at the schools they attended. Jerry York though cut his teeth at Bowling Green and was successful there before he went home. To say that fans will return because its an Alum is a stretch in my opinion. The fan base at RPI is pretty substantial. Even with a very sub par year this years team was 2nd in the ECAC for attendance. What this fan base wants is a winning product.

          My concern simply is that this school has had little success with AC becoming HC. Many hot young candidates fail. Just look at Bill Bellichek, hot young prospect failed miserably at his first HC opportunity. If Barr is hired I hope he is a success. I've heard he feels its going to take 3-4 years to turn RPI into a winning program. Do you as a fan want to wait that long? To me that sounds like a guy who is just saying that the players on the current team are worthless and that he can't be successful until he has a full contingent of his own recruits. A team that knocks off Harvard and takes Union to OT a number of times this season doesn't sound like a team that can't change on the fly. Does this team need to improve in certain areas, YES. Much of the improvement though can happen with solid coach IMO. There is a lot of talent on this team.

          Comment


          • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

            Originally posted by Noresmen View Post
            My point simply was that just because they are an Alumni doesn't mean they have the Holy Grail at their disposal. Yes there have been some fairly successful coaches that have coached at the schools they attended. Jerry York though cut his teeth at Bowling Green and was successful there before he went home. To say that fans will return because its an Alum is a stretch in my opinion. The fan base at RPI is pretty substantial. Even with a very sub par year this years team was 2nd in the ECAC for attendance. What this fan base wants is a winning product.

            My concern simply is that this school has had little success with AC becoming HC. Many hot young candidates fail. Just look at Bill Bellichek, hot young prospect failed miserably at his first HC opportunity. If Barr is hired I hope he is a success. I've heard he feels its going to take 3-4 years to turn RPI into a winning program. Do you as a fan want to wait that long? To me that sounds like a guy who is just saying that the players on the current team are worthless and that he can't be successful until he has a full contingent of his own recruits. A team that knocks off Harvard and takes Union to OT a number of times this season doesn't sound like a team that can't change on the fly. Does this team need to improve in certain areas, YES. Much of the improvement though can happen with solid coach IMO. There is a lot of talent on this team.
            So you want to go from step A to step C in zero time flat, and if you go through step B, which happens to be in the way, it's a failure? This is how teams end up perpetually in the basement.

            Comment


            • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

              Originally posted by FlagDUDE08 View Post
              I'm fairly certain the associated concern is that the last couple times we brought on an assistant coach, we didn't do so hot. Should this condemn an applicant? Not necessarily, but I can understand why someone wouldn't want to take that chance, lest they be considered "insane".
              Right, but it's really unfair to make broad assumptions of anyone like that. Barr or Riga could come in and flop for similar reasons to Appert. Gosek could find that he can't replicate his Oswego success at Division I. Considering how dismissive everyone is of Smith based on his record, there's nothing out there to say that he can't come here, make everything click, and turn RPI into Boston College overnight. You just don't know. All you can do is make educated guesses.

              But there's a reason that Barr (and Riga) are hot items based on their records as they exist, even if they lack any significant head coaching experience. I suspect both will be a head coach somewhere soon, and odds are good that one or both will be pretty decent.

              If people are looking for a sure thing, athletics is the wrong place to be doing it. Look at UConn last night.

              Originally posted by FlagDUDE08 View Post
              So you want to go from step A to step C in zero time flat, and if you go through step B, which happens to be in the way, it's a failure? This is how teams end up perpetually in the basement.
              Agree. Can recall the folks who were angry with Appert in years 2 and 3 and they never really lost their hate for him in the decent years.
              Last edited by realet; 04-01-2017, 10:00 AM.
              Without A Peer - Full coverage of RPI Men's and Women's Hockey, with a twist of lemon.

              Without A Peer live tweets every RPI hockey game, men's and women's. Follow us at @without_a_peer on Twitter.

              Comment


              • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

                Originally posted by realet View Post
                Right, but it's really unfair to make broad assumptions of anyone like that. Barr or Riga could come in and flop for similar reasons to Appert. Gosek could find that he can't replicate his Oswego success at Division I. Considering how dismissive everyone is of Smith based on his record, there's nothing out there to say that he can't come here, make everything click, and turn RPI into Boston College overnight. You just don't know. All you can do is make educated guesses.

                But there's a reason that Barr (and Riga) are hot items based on their records as they exist, even if they lack any significant head coaching experience. I suspect both will be a head coach somewhere soon, and odds are good that one or both will be pretty decent.



                If people are looking for a sure thing, athletics is the wrong place to be doing it. Look at UConn last night.



                Agree. Can recall the folks who were angry with Appert in years 2 and 3 and they never really lost their hate for him in the decent years.
                I think we are all pretty much on the same page. You want the best coach. I just don't feel that being an Alumni should be an overriding factor. I like Riga because he knows the team and the league the best. 11 years in conference, has coached against this team every year. Knows the current roster of players and what they will need to succeed. It's just an opinion and not one that counts.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by realet View Post
                  . Barr or Riga could come in and flop for similar reasons to Appert. . All you can do is make educated guesses.
                  rience. I suspect both will be a head coach somewhere soon, and odds are good that one or both will be pretty decent.

                  Agree. Can recall the folks who were angry with Appert in years 2 and 3 and they never really lost their hate for him in the decent years.
                  So in your estimation why did Appert fail?

                  And if there is bad luck with hiring the HOT AC, why is that?

                  It often is a crap shoot but seems some schools are better at it than others or willing to wait it out while the HC cuts his teeth, ie Harvard

                  Comment


                  • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

                    Originally posted by Noresmen View Post
                    I think we are all pretty much on the same page. You want the best coach. I just don't feel that being an Alumni should be an overriding factor. I like Riga because he knows the team and the league the best. 11 years in conference, has coached against this team every year. Knows the current roster of players and what they will need to succeed. It's just an opinion and not one that counts.
                    Being an alumnus is not an overriding factor. It is a contributing factor.

                    And I'm not sure how someone who coached somewhere else necessarily knows the team best. Whoever takes the team over will know it better than anyone else by the first game of the season.

                    Originally posted by giwan View Post
                    So in your estimation why did Appert fail?

                    And if there is bad luck with hiring the HOT AC, why is that?

                    It often is a crap shoot but seems some schools are better at it than others or willing to wait it out while the HC cuts his teeth, ie Harvard
                    Ultimately, Appert's tactical prowess may not be where it needed to be overall.

                    Not sure where the "bad luck" part comes from. Luck is where preparation meets opportunity, like Seneca said.
                    Last edited by realet; 04-01-2017, 11:35 AM.
                    Without A Peer - Full coverage of RPI Men's and Women's Hockey, with a twist of lemon.

                    Without A Peer live tweets every RPI hockey game, men's and women's. Follow us at @without_a_peer on Twitter.

                    Comment


                    • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

                      Originally posted by giwan View Post
                      So in your estimation why did Appert fail?

                      And if there is bad luck with hiring the HOT AC, why is that?

                      It often is a crap shoot but seems some schools are better at it than others or willing to wait it out while the HC cuts his teeth, ie Harvard
                      A lot of emphasis on the HC, and not much on the ACs both of whom were from the same BCHL organization which has always struggled. The question always is will the new HC be able to bring in the right ACs who can identify, evaluate, and most of all recruit?

                      Comment


                      • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

                        Originally posted by Bradz View Post
                        A lot of emphasis on the HC, and not much on the ACs both of whom were from the same BCHL organization which has always struggled. The question always is will the new HC be able to bring in the right ACs who can identify, evaluate, and most of all recruit?
                        SA could recruit. It may be very important, but it isn't clear that it is number one.
                        sigpic

                        Let's Go 'Tute!

                        Maxed out at 2,147,483,647 at 10:00 AM EDT 9/17/07.

                        2012 Poser Of The Year

                        Comment


                        • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

                          Originally posted by FlagDUDE08 View Post
                          My biggest worry is that we won't see a noticeable change until SAJ retires, which if she's anything like the spouse of her former employer, will be quite a long time.
                          Who was SAJ's former employer - Grandma Moses' husband?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Waite21 View Post
                            Who was SAJ's former employer - Grandma Moses' husband?
                            He's injecting politics into the thread. He's talking about Bill and Hillary Clinton, but instead of just saying that Flaggy thinks he's being sly.
                            Uncle Mickey: July 23, 1950-July 22, 2003

                            WRPI, 91.5 FM...usually color commentary.

                            Comment


                            • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

                              Originally posted by Waite21 View Post
                              Who was SAJ's former employer - Grandma Moses' husband?
                              Bill Clinton... prior to coming to RPI, she was head of the NRC. That's why a bunch of politicians from the Clinton days were commencement speakers while I was at the 'tute.

                              Comment


                              • Re: RPI 2017 Off-Season: We March 4th into the Future

                                Originally posted by realet View Post
                                Agree. Can recall the folks who were angry with Appert in years 2 and 3 and they never really lost their hate for him in the decent years.
                                I think part of the problem was that Appert came in promising an uptempo, high powered offense - expectations that may have been too high. We saw many seasons where solid, talented recruits came in but the offense never really produced. In his defense, the 2009-10 season was strong and the 2009-13 period probably would have been better had Jerry D'Amigo and Brandon Pirri stuck around. But I think there was so much optimism when Appert was hired people just assumed the team would be back to challenging for a league title and trips to Albany/LP would be the rule and not the exception, and when those expectations weren't met, the frustration really ramped up. Appert himself seemed to admit this a few weeks ago when he told Ken Schott that he hoped the school would evaluate him more on the graduation rate, community service, character building, and other factors (of which he can justifiably be very proud) than the W-L record.

                                Whenever the new hire is made McElroy and the new coach should be really clear at the outset about what they think is working, what needs fixing, what the long-term goals are, and how long they think it will take to get there. There can and should be lots of congrats for the new coach and optimism for the future, but a realistic idea of what to expect would help cool some of the frustration out there and maybe even buy the new coach some time to turn things around. Everyone knows there are no guarantees, but if they think the program is 3-4 years away from contending from a league title, say that. If it's 6-7 years, say that. But amid all the congrats and good feelings about the new hire, be realistic about what needs to be done. And I think the school needs to extend an olive branch to hockey alumni and do what it takes to restore their faith in the program (given their response to the Record story, I am not holding my breath).

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X