Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2017 NCAA tournament selection thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread

    Originally posted by UCBadger View Post
    I was going to ask if that would still be true with Utica losing and Trinity having a win and a loss.
    I forgot about Trinity winning yesterday. Trinity would have it by a nose. That makes it a little tougher for Utica, doesn't it? Utica 18-9-0. Trin-Trin would be 17-7-3

    Utica 0.6667
    Trin-Trin 0.6852

    That's close.
    2007-2008 ECAC East/NESCAC Interlock Pick 'em winner
    2007-2008 Last Person Standing Winner,
    2013-2014 Last Person Standing Winner (tie)
    2016-2017 Last Person Standing Winner

    Comment


    • Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread

      Originally posted by NUProf View Post
      I forgot about Trinity winning yesterday. Trinity would have it by a nose. That makes it a little tougher for Utica, doesn't it? Utica 18-9-0. Trin-Trin would be 17-7-3

      Utica 0.6667
      Trin-Trin 0.6852

      That's close.
      basically a half game difference !


      "FEAR THE BIRD!"

      Comment


      • Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread

        Are two of those wins against D-II teams? The D-3 record is currently 15-6-3. So a loss would make it 15-7-3 for 0.660?????
        2016-2017 ECAC West Pick 'em Champion
        2013-2014 SUNYAC Pick 'em Champion
        2012-2013 NCHAMIACMCHA Pick 'em Champion
        2003-2004 SUNYAC Pick 'em Champion
        2004 Recipient of “The Poster Formerly Known as Mr. Hockey”’s Punxsutawney Phil Award for Outstanding Prognostication.
        2005-2018 Administrator of ECAC West Pick 'em & UCHC Pick 'em, the original D-III pick'em game; RIP
        2009 D-III TOP runner-up
        Wisconsin Hockey - NCAA Men's National Champions
        1973, 1977, 1981*, 1983*, 1990, 2006

        Comment


        • Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread

          Originally posted by UCBadger View Post
          Are two of those wins against D-II teams? The D-3 record is currently 15-6-3. So a loss would make it 15-7-3 for 0.660?????
          Doesn't matter now, but one of the wins was against Post. The other was that game that I forgot about with their win against Bill yesterday.
          2007-2008 ECAC East/NESCAC Interlock Pick 'em winner
          2007-2008 Last Person Standing Winner,
          2013-2014 Last Person Standing Winner (tie)
          2016-2017 Last Person Standing Winner

          Comment


          • Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread

            My Take - your mileage may vary

            So we now have Pool A

            Endicott
            Salem State
            Augsburg
            St. Norbert
            Norwich
            Trinity
            Plattsburgh

            Pool B- Stevens Point or Hobart

            Pool C

            Hobart or Stevens Point
            Oswego
            Adrian
            Hamilton

            My guess at the Seeds

            East
            1. Norwich
            2. Endicott
            3. Hobart
            4. Oswego
            5. Trinity
            6. Hamilton
            7. Plattsburgh
            8. Salem

            West

            1. SNC
            2. UWSP
            3. Adrian
            4. Augsburg

            Quarterfinal Hosts

            Norwich, Endicott, Hobart, SNC

            Oswego at Adrian ---> Hobart
            Augsburg at UWSP ---> SNC
            Salem at Trinity ---> Endicott
            Plattsburgh at Hamilton --> Norwich

            Semi final Groupings
            Norwich triad vs. Hobart Triad
            SNC triad vs. Endicot Triad

            Wild guesses, because Hamilton/Trinity/Plattsburgh could be shuffled.
            2007-2008 ECAC East/NESCAC Interlock Pick 'em winner
            2007-2008 Last Person Standing Winner,
            2013-2014 Last Person Standing Winner (tie)
            2016-2017 Last Person Standing Winner

            Comment


            • Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread

              I would have Oswego seeded ahead of Adrian. Adrian at Oswego.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by coasttocoast View Post
                I would have Oswego seeded ahead of Adrian. Adrian at Oswego.
                Wrong. 3W > 4E. Adrian would host if those are regional seeds. Period.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by NUProf View Post
                  My Take - your mileage may vary

                  So we now have Pool A

                  Endicott
                  Salem State
                  Augsburg
                  St. Norbert
                  Norwich
                  Trinity
                  Plattsburgh

                  Pool B- Stevens Point or Hobart

                  Pool C

                  Hobart or Stevens Point
                  Oswego
                  Adrian
                  Hamilton

                  My guess at the Seeds

                  East
                  1. Norwich
                  2. Endicott
                  3. Hobart
                  4. Oswego
                  5. Trinity
                  6. Hamilton
                  7. Plattsburgh
                  8. Salem

                  West

                  1. SNC
                  2. UWSP
                  3. Adrian
                  4. Augsburg

                  Quarterfinal Hosts

                  Norwich, Endicott, Hobart, SNC

                  Oswego at Adrian ---> Hobart
                  Augsburg at UWSP ---> SNC
                  Salem at Trinity ---> Endicott
                  Plattsburgh at Hamilton --> Norwich

                  Semi final Groupings
                  Norwich triad vs. Hobart Triad
                  SNC triad vs. Endicot Triad

                  Wild guesses, because Hamilton/Trinity/Plattsburgh could be shuffled.
                  Don't be surprised to see all four western teams get byes into the quarterfinals. Might not happen but could very well happen.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Fishman'81 View Post
                    Assuming Hamilton wins today, is there any history that you know of to suspect that the committee might favor Utica over Trinity in an effort to boost (early) FF ticket sales?
                    Yes.

                    Remember the year Elmira was preselected as a neutral site host in their downtown arena?

                    That year Elmira got an at-large bid when everyone thought they had no chance. It was very, very surprising. Very.

                    Elmira did end up making it to the semifinal round, but still...
                    Russell Jaslow
                    [Former] SUNYAC Correspondent
                    U.S. College Hockey Online

                    Comment


                    • Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread

                      Originally posted by Russell Jaslow View Post
                      Yes.

                      Remember the year Elmira was preselected as a neutral site host in their downtown arena?

                      That year Elmira got an at-large bid when everyone thought they had no chance. It was very, very surprising. Very.

                      Elmira did end up making it to the semifinal round, but still...
                      The year was 2006.
                      Larry Normandin
                      SUNY Cobleskill '83-SUNY Plattsburgh '00

                      Temper is one thing you can't get rid of by losing it.

                      God gave everyone patience-The wise use it.

                      Trust is like paper - Once crumbled it can never again be perfect.

                      Twitter w/ Bob Emery

                      WIRY (Windows Player)
                      WIRY (Chrome/Android Player)

                      Talk is cheap because supply exceeds demand!

                      Pen pals

                      D3HOCKEY.com

                      Comment


                      • Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread

                        Originally posted by Russell Jaslow View Post
                        Yes.

                        Remember the year Elmira was preselected as a neutral site host in their downtown arena?

                        That year Elmira got an at-large bid when everyone thought they had no chance. It was very, very surprising. Very.

                        Elmira did end up making it to the semifinal round, but still...
                        That's what I was driving at.. As in: to what extent -if any- prospective attendance might skew the selections.

                        Past results don't guarantee anything, and Utica is completely moot at this point, but thanks for the interesting historical reference.
                        Last edited by Fishman'81; 03-05-2017, 05:38 PM.

                        Comment


                        • Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread

                          Originally posted by norm1909 View Post
                          Good stuff, Norm.

                          It always amazes me to detect the breath of corruption around something as fundamentally insignificant as the D-3 hockey selection-process, but I suppose dirty politics exist even at the PTA level.

                          Comment


                          • Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread

                            Originally posted by Sir Nubs View Post
                            Don't be surprised to see all four western teams get byes into the quarterfinals. Might not happen but could very well happen.
                            I think that is possible, but unlikely. Mostly because Norwich will be the national #1 seed, and the pairing that I show meet the avoid all flights rule, while maintaining bracket integrity.

                            #1 Avoid Flights (check)
                            #2 Maintain bracket integrity (check)

                            4 byes to the West
                            #1 Avoid Flights (check)
                            #2 Maintain bracket integrity (not so much)
                            2007-2008 ECAC East/NESCAC Interlock Pick 'em winner
                            2007-2008 Last Person Standing Winner,
                            2013-2014 Last Person Standing Winner (tie)
                            2016-2017 Last Person Standing Winner

                            Comment


                            • Re: 2017 NCAA tournament selection thread

                              Originally posted by Fishman'81 View Post
                              That's what I was driving at.. As in: to what extent -if any- prospective attendance might skew the selections.

                              Past results don't guarantee anything, and Utica is completely moot at this point, but thanks for the interesting historical reference.
                              With comparisons that would have been as close as they would have been between a losing Trinity and Utica, that could have tilted the decision. I kind of think Utica would have gotten in anyway, but we will never know. Now, if Utica somehow still gets in, then I would call shenanigans.
                              2007-2008 ECAC East/NESCAC Interlock Pick 'em winner
                              2007-2008 Last Person Standing Winner,
                              2013-2014 Last Person Standing Winner (tie)
                              2016-2017 Last Person Standing Winner

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Russell Jaslow View Post
                                Yes.

                                Remember the year Elmira was preselected as a neutral site host in their downtown arena?

                                That year Elmira got an at-large bid when everyone thought they had no chance. It was very, very surprising. Very.

                                Elmira did end up making it to the semifinal round, but still...
                                Considering Elmira was 11-1 in last 12 games entering NCAAs and won ECACW Tournament it wasn't all that surprising.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X