Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

    Get ready for The Heist.

    A White House official confirmed reports that President Donald Trump intends to add to Washington’s already tickey to-do list for next week by rolling out his long-promised plan to simplify the tax code and slash federal rates sometime next week.

    “The president was saying what we’ve been saying all along, that he wants to do tax reform as quickly as possible while still doing it right,” a the official said.

    The plan will propose a “massive tax cut” for individuals and businesses, Trump told the AP. As he often does, the president did not speak in specifics during the interview, according to an AP report, but he did say his proposal would, if enacted, be “bigger, I believe, than any tax cut ever.”
    As with Reagan and Dubya, this is all that matters and the sole reason the GOP exists. Those two prior tax cuts allowed the richest 6000 families in the US to amass approximately 15 trillion dollars in wealth at the expense of the US taxpayer, now on the hook for all of it in debt. For this gift we were assured that everyone would benefit. The red and green lines on this chart are the result: the economy grew at the same rate as before, saved by worker productivity (driven by technology) soaring, while median wealth in the US stagnated. The 1% disappeared into the stratosphere as the US was transformed from a representative republic with an inequality problem to an outright oligarchy.

    This is the whole ballgame. Republican tax policy is a heist. Ideally we would restore the tax rates which created the middle class in the US, but as a bare minimum we have to hold the line on the crooks and prevent a third big haul to the Caymans.
    Last edited by Kepler; 04-21-2017, 03:57 PM.
    Cornell University
    National Champion 1967, 1970
    ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
    Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Kepler View Post
      Get ready for The Heist.



      As with Reagan and Dubya, this is all that matters and the sole reason the GOP exists. Those two prior tax cuts allowed the richest 6000 families in the US to amass approximately 15 trillion dollars in wealth at the expense of the US taxpayer, now on the hook for all of it in debt. For this gift we were assured that everyone would benefit. The red and green lines on this chart are the result: the economy grew at the same rate as before, saved by worker productivity (driven by technology) soaring, while median wealth in the US stagnated. The 1% disappeared into the stratosphere as the US was transformed from a representative republic with an inequality problem to an outright oligarchy.

      This is the whole ballgame. Republican tax policy is a heist. Ideally we would restore the tax rates which created the middle class in the US, but as a bare minimum we have to hold the line on the crooks and prevent a third big haul to the Caymans.
      Wrong thread.

      Comment


      • Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

        Originally posted by Kepler View Post
        Get ready for The Heist.



        As with Reagan and Dubya, this is all that matters and the sole reason the GOP exists. Those two prior tax cuts allowed the richest 6000 families in the US to amass approximately 15 trillion dollars in wealth at the expense of the US taxpayer, now on the hook for all of it in debt. For this gift we were assured that everyone would benefit. The red and green lines on this chart are the result: the economy grew at the same rate as before, saved by worker productivity (driven by technology) soaring, while median wealth in the US stagnated. The 1% disappeared into the stratosphere as the US was transformed from a representative republic with an inequality problem to an outright oligarchy.

        This is the whole ballgame. Republican tax policy is a heist. Ideally we would restore the tax rates which created the middle class in the US, but as a bare minimum we have to hold the line on the crooks and prevent a third big haul to the Caymans.
        But, I might be rich some day and I don't want to pay taxes.
        **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

        Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
        Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

        Comment


        • Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

          Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
          But, I might be rich some day and I don't want to pay taxes.
          If we make smart, hard-working people who have earned their wealth the Murican Way pay more than their fair share, they will have less money to create jobs and pay wages. At the same time, the gubmint will just take that extra money and give it to illegal mexicans, welfare bums, abortionists, and left-wing radio. That aint what our honest, god-fearing forefathers had in mind.

          Comment


          • Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

            Originally posted by MinnesotaNorthStar View Post
            While the vast majority of Pro-Lifers are religious, there are atheists that are Pro-Life, just as there are religious people who are Pro-Choice. So, it is not exclusively a religious belief.
            The former are too few in number to make a difference, the latter are irrelevant to my point.

            Comment


            • Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

              Originally posted by unofan View Post
              Wrong thread.
              F-ck.

              Sorry.
              Cornell University
              National Champion 1967, 1970
              ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
              Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

              Comment


              • Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

                Originally posted by Slap Shot View Post
                The former are too few in number to make a difference
                This is interesting.
                Cornell University
                National Champion 1967, 1970
                ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
                Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020

                Comment


                • Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

                  Commence speculation in 3... 2... 1... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjPjtSE58rc

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by FlagDUDE08 View Post
                    Commence speculation in 3... 2... 1... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjPjtSE58rc
                    I won't believe a thing until I see his or her signature on paper or a cold dead body.
                    CCT '77 & '78
                    4 kids
                    5 grandsons (BCA 7/09, CJA 5/14, JDL 8/14, JFL 6/16, PJL 7/18)
                    1 granddaughter (EML 4/18)

                    ”Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.”
                    - Benjamin Franklin

                    Banned from the St. Lawrence University Facebook page - March 2016 (But I got better).

                    I want to live forever. So far, so good.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

                      Roberts sides with the liberals to party an attack on the FHA

                      http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...r_housing.html
                      Code:
                      As of 9/21/10:         As of 9/13/10:
                      College Hockey 6       College Football 0
                      BTHC 4                 WCHA FC:  1
                      Originally posted by SanTropez
                      May your paint thinner run dry and the fleas of a thousand camels infest your dead deer.
                      Originally posted by bigblue_dl
                      I don't even know how to classify magic vagina smoke babies..
                      Originally posted by Kepler
                      When the giraffes start building radio telescopes they can join too.
                      He's probably going to be a superstar but that man has more baggage than North West

                      Comment


                      • Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

                        Looking ahead, arguments are done and all that's left is waiting for the opinions. The court has about 2/3rds of the opinions done, and probably another 15 or so will be easy ones from the March and April sittings that just haven't had enough time to get done yet.

                        That leaves about 9 or 10 that are bigger cases or otherwise seem to be taking awhile.

                        The only one left from November involves a citizenship question regarding differences in treatment between fathers and mothers when conveying citizenship to their foreign born children. Ginsberg is likely writing it, since she is the only one without an opinion in November.

                        The two left from December include one on alien detentions and then the North Carolina redistricting challenge under the VRA. Roberts presumably has the voting case, and Alito likely has the other one, though Kagan also doesn't have an opinion from that month.

                        Too many left to predict authors from other months. Among the bigger cases are the Missouri church playground funding, qualified immunity challenges regarding post 9/11 detentions of Muslims, the disparagement provision of the Lanham Acct regarding trademarks (which would directly affect the Redskins trademark case), whether social media restrictions on sex offenders is constitutional (doubtful), and whether the fourth amendment applies when a Mexican kid is killed on Mexican soil by a us border agent after playing in the border area.
                        Last edited by unofan; 05-02-2017, 10:46 AM.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

                          Kind of shocked by this one.

                          https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/15/u...smtyp=cur&_r=0

                          With Gorsuch now on it looks like an easy 5-4 win for conservatives. The Supreme's actually went liberal by not taking up the case.
                          **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                          Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                          Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

                            Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
                            Kind of shocked by this one.

                            https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/15/u...smtyp=cur&_r=0

                            With Gorsuch now on it looks like an easy 5-4 win for conservatives. The Supreme's actually went liberal by not taking up the case.
                            It looks like Roberts told NC to figure out who is in charge of the state government to bring the case to the Supremes. It was brought by the old Republican governor, the new Dem asked it to be dismissed, and the state legislature wanted it appealed.
                            "I went over the facts in my head, and admired how much uglier the situation had just become. Over the years I've learned that ignorance is more than just bliss. It's freaking orgasmic ecstasy".- Harry Dresden, Blood Rites


                            Western Michigan Bronco Hockey- 2012 Mason Cup Champions

                            Comment


                            • Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day

                              Originally posted by ScoobyDoo View Post
                              Kind of shocked by this one.

                              https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/15/u...smtyp=cur&_r=0

                              With Gorsuch now on it looks like an easy 5-4 win for conservatives. The Supreme's actually went liberal by not taking up the case.
                              I dont think Gorsuch would have voted with the conservatives on that one FWIW.
                              "It's as if the Drumpf Administration is made up of the worst and unfunny parts of the Cleveland Browns, Washington Generals, and the alien Mon-Stars from Space Jam."
                              -aparch

                              "Scenes in "Empire Strikes Back" that take place on the tundra planet Hoth were shot on the present-day site of Ralph Engelstad Arena."
                              -INCH

                              Of course I'm a fan of the Vikings. A sick and demented Masochist of a fan, but a fan none the less.
                              -ScoobyDoo 12/17/2007

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Handyman View Post
                                I dont think Gorsuch would have voted with the conservatives on that one FWIW.
                                Don't forget. All reports had him closer to Thomas than Scalia.
                                **NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.

                                Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
                                Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X