Tweet
Originally posted by Kepler
View Post
-
None announced today, mr. pedantic (I'm going on 3 hours sleep due to a teething kid and stuck in project management training all day, so I apologize for being short tempered today). -
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
To that end, we can never be certain on any day of any which year. Any justice alive may decide to retire at any given point. Except RBG, she's in it until she expires while hearing a case on the bench.Originally posted by Kepler View Post"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." George Orwell, 1984
"One does not simply walk into Mordor. Its Black Gates are guarded by more than just Orcs. There is evil there that does not sleep, and the Great Eye is ever watchful. It is a barren wasteland, riddled with fire and ash and dust, the very air you breathe is a poisonous fume." Boromir
"Good news! We have a delivery." Professor FarnsworthComment
-
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
< left palm on forehead >Originally posted by unofan View Post
Nope, no, I don't feel surprised.The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.
North Dakota Hockey:
Comment
-
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
And now you have put in an extra "today".Originally posted by unofan View Post
The preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.
North Dakota Hockey: Comment
-
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
Like a thief in the night ...Originally posted by St. Clown View PostThe preceding post may contain trigger words and is not safe-space approved. <-- Virtue signaling.
North Dakota Hockey: Comment
-
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
Meh. Both of those are self-inflicted.Originally posted by unofan View PostCornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020Comment
-
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
A novel take on 1 Thess 5:2.Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post
Duct tape?Cornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020Comment
-
-
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
Of course it is. Life is choices. The bright sunny day beckons.Originally posted by unofan View Post
I mean, no, I'm not leaving my corporate slave pen either, but it's a choice I make every day. Stupid forethought.
Cornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020Comment
-
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
That's not a facepalm moment. That's a everyone knew exactly what was going to happen and those of us who gave a ****, lost.Originally posted by The Sicatoka View Post**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.Comment
-
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
What I meant was: did Kennedy announce he is not retiring or did Kennedy not announce he is retiring?Originally posted by unofan View PostCornell University
National Champion 1967, 1970
ECAC Champion 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1973, 1980, 1986, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2005, 2010
Ivy League Champion 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1977, 1978, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1996, 1997, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, 2020Comment
-
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
Well Trump got part of his Travel Ban reinstated..."It's as if the Drumpf Administration is made up of the worst and unfunny parts of the Cleveland Browns, Washington Generals, and the alien Mon-Stars from Space Jam."
-aparch
"Scenes in "Empire Strikes Back" that take place on the tundra planet Hoth were shot on the present-day site of Ralph Engelstad Arena."
-INCH
Of course I'm a fan of the Vikings. A sick and demented Masochist of a fan, but a fan none the less.
-ScoobyDoo 12/17/2007Comment
-
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
Yep. More winning. Are we sick of it yet?Originally posted by Handyman View Post**NOTE: The misleading post above was brought to you by Reynold's Wrap and American Steeples, makers of Crosses.
Originally Posted by dropthatpuck-Scooby's a lost cause.
Originally Posted by First Time, Long Time-Always knew you were nothing but a troll.Comment
-
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
Interesting...Originally posted by Handyman View Post
“In practical terms, this means that §2(c) may not be enforced against foreign nationals who have a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States,” the Court said. “All other foreign nationals are subject to the provisions of EO–2.” Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch said they would have granted the Trump administration’s request to block the lower court injunctions in their entirety while legal proceedings unfold.Code:As of 9/21/10: As of 9/13/10: College Hockey 6 College Football 0 BTHC 4 WCHA FC: 1
Originally posted by SanTropezOriginally posted by bigblue_dlHe's probably going to be a superstar but that man has more baggage than North WestOriginally posted by KeplerComment
-
Re: Power of the SCOTUS IX: The outlook wasn’t brilliant for the SCOTUS nine that day
A question. From the SCOTUS:
The facts of these cases illustrate the sort of relationship
that qualifies. For individuals, a close familial relation
-
ship is required. A foreign national who wishes to enter
the United States to live with or visit a family member,
like Doe’s wife or Dr. Elshikh’s mother-in-law, clearly has
such a relationship. As for entities, the relationship must
be formal, documented, and formed in the ordinary course,
rather than for the purpose of evading EO–2.How could this be proven? What is the legal threshold here?The stu-
dents from the designated countries who have been admit-
ted to the University of Hawaii have such a relationship
with an American entity. So too would a worker who
accepted an offer of employment from an American com-
pany or a lecturer invited to address an American audi-
ence. Not so someone who enters into a relationship sim-
ply to avoid §2(c): For example, a nonprofit group devoted to
immigration issues may not contact foreign nationals from
the designated countries, add them to client lists, and then
secure their entry by claiming injury from their exclusion.
It looks like Thomas, in his opinion, wonders the same thing:
Moreover, I fear that the Court’s remedy will prove
unworkable. Today’s compro
mise will burden executive
officials with the task of deciding—on peril of contempt—
whether individuals from the six affected nations who
wish to enter the United States have a sufficient connec-
tion to a person or entity in this country.Last edited by dxmnkd316; 06-26-2017, 11:59 AM.Code:As of 9/21/10: As of 9/13/10: College Hockey 6 College Football 0 BTHC 4 WCHA FC: 1
Originally posted by SanTropezOriginally posted by bigblue_dlHe's probably going to be a superstar but that man has more baggage than North WestOriginally posted by KeplerComment
Comment