Patty Kazmaeir 2017

[TonyTheTiger20]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Or at least learn what the phrase "without question" means.

It's pretty much not debatable

[FiveHoleFrenzy]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

/ducks

http://www.bcinterruption.com/boston...-womens-hockey

I'm surprised you didn't use "clearly" instead of "without question". It would have fit the bit better.

[Timothy A]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

You should watch more hockey: Or at least learn what the phrase "without question" means.

So does that mean there is a question? Maybe I'm catching onto this....

[Timothy A]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Patty committee conference call is Monday to discuss and debate the top 10. Votes are due in by 5 pm est that night.

2 more shutouts for ARD this weekend. There were no other shutouts in the WCHA.

[FiveHoleFrenzy]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

2 more shutouts for ARD this weekend. There were no other shutouts in the WCHA.

Without question, it's ARD's award this year.

[robertearle]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

2 more shutouts for ARD this weekend. There were no other shutouts in the WCHA.

ARD has played in 30 games this year.

15 have been shutouts.

[Quiet Riot]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

ard has played in 30 games this year.

15 have been shutouts.

is there anything else to say other than that?
Hands down!!! Ard!!!

[vicb]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

/ducks

http://www.bcinterruption.com/boston...-womens-hockey

.And the only worthy goaltender plays for the country’s top team built with a roster that I — me, Grant, personally — could put up double digit shutouts behind.

Now that I would pay a saw buck to see .

[Quiet Riot]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Can i shoot first?

[Puckdrop14]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Her statistics cannot be ignored and for that reason, she should be the winner. She has essentially repeated last year's exceptional season. Zero's in half of her games is amazing no matter how good the team in front of you is.

[FiveHoleFrenzy]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Her statistics cannot be ignored and for that reason, she should be the winner. She has essentially repeated last year's exceptional season. Zero's in half of her games is amazing no matter how good the team in front of you is.

Seems logical but...

https://az616578.vo.msecnd.net/files...SizeRender.jpg

[bluffrinkrat]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

I have the perfect solution. How about Desbiens wins the Kazmaeir and Pannek the USCHO Player of the Year? That way everybody is satisfied...well maybe not quite everybody. I just hope some of the eastern voters look at reality and not their bias or "alternate facts."

I'd love to see another defenseman win the award, but just not this year. If Keller gets 17 more goals and equals Ruggiero's 2004 total, maybe I'll change my mind.

[Eeyore]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Can i shoot first?

You should ask that question later.

[TonyTheTiger20]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Can i shoot first?

You should ask that question later.

I laughed

[pokechecker]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

ahhahahahaha

Pokey, you gotta admit this was a good comeback too

I’ll have to take your word for it, his comments are WAY beyond my comprehension.

While I agree the award should probably be given to a defensive player, you are suggesting the wrong one. Your statement that even you could get a shutout behind the Badgers is absurd, you don’t shut out half the teams by playing good defense. It’s the goal tender. Anybody who saw the final regular season series between WI/MN knows this.

How important is defense to win championships in women’s college hockey?
How did Harvard beat Boston College? How did they nearly beat MN the same year?

The three FF games last year sure seemed like more of a defensive battle than offensive.