Patty Kazmaeir 2017

[bluffrinkrat]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Interview with Clarkson's Cayley Mercer.

https://t.co/abMOqxPooe

Very nice interview and I like the hat.

[crutch]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Interview with Clarkson's Cayley Mercer.

https://t.co/abMOqxPooe

Very impressive young lady.

[KTDC]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Very nice interview and I like the hat.

It looks like I lit the room for that interview..lol

[EPIC97]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Tim can you edit the title of this thread to spell Kazmaier correctly.

[Timothy A]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Tim can you edit the title of this thread to spell Kazmaier correctly.

I'm not sure, but I felt really stupid screwing that up.

[Timothy A]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Tim can you edit the title of this thread to spell Kazmaier correctly.

I figured it out!

[TonyTheTiger20]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

I'm not sure, but I felt really stupid screwing that up.

You can be forgiven, it's been *ages* since Wisconsin has won the award, after all

[bluffrinkrat]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

And today the name has been shortened in many places to "Kaz Watch '17." I prefer the whole name and I'm glad if you've figured out how to fix the spelling.

[Timothy A]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

I figured it out!

Not. Thought I did.

[pokechecker]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

All it takes is googling .

why didn't you say so? If it says so on the internet, then obviously it is true

this is something that has been researched for decades.

so in addition to assuming the research generalizes to women's hockey, we're supposed to assume this decades ago research has temporal significance as well?

It's pretty simple really. If you play great defense and do not give up a goal, you only have to score once to win.
Substitute a different team that isn't quite as good that gives up one goal and they have to to score twice as many to win.
Substitute yet another team even less proficient that gives up two goals and they will have to score three times as many goals to win.

see the pattern yet, Stupid?

No?

OK, an even worse team that gives up three goals is going to have to score four times as many goals to win
And guess what, the team that gives up four ... yes! will have to score five times as many goals to win.
see? it isn't that difficult.

[D2D]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Rules question: can a referee hand out coincidental 10 minute misconduct penalties?

[bluffrinkrat]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

Rules question: can a referee hand out coincidental 10 minute misconduct penalties?

Are you referring to hockey or the fan forum? I've never seen it happen in hockey that I recall, but it may be possible. The fan forum, no idea.

[TonyTheTiger20]

see the pattern yet, Stupid?

Check the batteries in your troll subtlety filter; I think you might need a fresh set

[NMH]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

I think one big argument in ARD's favor is Cece's stats when Ann missed time. If it truly was all about the defense in front of the net and anyone could do well in that position, then Cece's numbers should be comparable to Ann's and aren't. Obviously there's the caveats about small sample size and that she's a rookie. But her GAA is double ARD's in the few games she played, belying that bit of conjecture.

For me, Pannek wasn't really in the discussion once her numbers dropped in the second half. It's difficult to argue about someone being dynamic when it was clear so much of their statistical success hinged on playing with another player. That line had special chemistry, but without Cameranesi, they definitely struggled more. I think it's difficult to argue in Pannek's favor there, especially in the face of what Stalder was doing.

I would have liked more focus on Pankowski, but I'm obviously biased. But she's put herself at the top of all the scoring categories despite a slow start and missing time with Team USA. Yes, great players shouldn't have slow starts and I'm definitely willing to argue that point and decide if it's an automatic disqualification type thing, but the fact is that even without scoring a goal in the first nine games, had Annie not missed four games (MN State and Bemidji) to play in the Nations Cup, she's probably be leading some offensive categories. Obvs there's no way to be sure, but I think she was an underrated candidate that isn't getting talked about enough.

[Timothy A]

Re: Patty Kazmaeir 2017

I think one big argument in ARD's favor is Cece's stats when Ann missed time. If it truly was all about the defense in front of the net and anyone could do well in that position, then Cece's numbers should be comparable to Ann's and aren't. Obviously there's the caveats about small sample size and that she's a rookie. But her GAA is double ARD's in the few games she played, belying that bit of conjecture.

For me, Pannek wasn't really in the discussion once her numbers dropped in the second half. It's difficult to argue about someone being dynamic when it was clear so much of their statistical success hinged on playing with another player. That line had special chemistry, but without Cameranesi, they definitely struggled more. I think it's difficult to argue in Pannek's favor there, especially in the face of what Stalder was doing.

I would have liked more focus on Pankowski, but I'm obviously biased. But she's put herself at the top of all the scoring categories despite a slow start and missing time with Team USA. Yes, great players shouldn't have slow starts and I'm definitely willing to argue that point and decide if it's an automatic disqualification type thing, but the fact is that even without scoring a goal in the first nine games, had Annie not missed four games (MN State and Bemidji) to play in the Nations Cup, she's probably be leading some offensive categories. Obvs there's no way to be sure, but I think she was an underrated candidate that isn't getting talked about enough.

No, this is not me under another identity, but these are the words from my head in the order that I would have typed them.