Big Ten > NCHC

[First Time, Long Time]

Again, it doesn't matter what has happened since the formation of the two conferences. The key is what happened before any of the current players hit puberty. Stay with the program.

Sorry...i try to stay out of freddy's maroon colored world.

[icehawk]

As usual you pick and choose your stats to suit your narrative.

The guy is obsessed. He has now reached nut job territory.

[FredsDeadFriend]

Re: Big Ten > NCHC

Epic failure JDUBBS...you didn't even count the Gophers' 39 self-claimed national titles from before the NCAA Tournament began. Assuming your Gopher Fanboy Card isn't all sticky, you can return it to Mariachi Arena at your earliest convenience.

Well, since I am not JDUBBS...? I don't know what to tell you man. I could look up what Ross Bernstein says about pre-NCAA Natl Titles, I know he claims that there are several in the 20s, at least 1 in the 30s, and one in 1940.

[FredsDeadFriend]

Re: Big Ten > NCHC

As usual you pick and choose your stats to suit your narrative.

How did I pick and choose anything??? Those are the total NCAA tourney #s. The NCAA picked and chose those #s.

If you want me to do what everyone claims JDUBBS did, and go back before the NCAA tourney, I guarantee you that it won't help the NCHC.

[First Time, Long Time]

How did I pick and choose anything??? Those are the total NCAA tourney #s. The NCAA picked and chose those #s.

If you want me to do what everyone claims JDUBBS did, and go back before the NCAA tourney, I guarantee you that it won't help the NCHC.

You do get the conferences did not exist till 4 years ago right?
As such...logic dictates that while schools can claim those...conferences can't because they did not exist. Its why schools separate their records based on the conferences they were in at the time.

You claimimg the B1G has all these titles is incorrect because they were not won while members of a B1G hockey conference.

So as I said...you twist them to fit your narrative...not factual arguments.

[FredsDeadFriend]

Re: Big Ten > NCHC

The guy is obsessed. He has now reached nut job territory.

nut job territory? lmao, I spend a very small amount of time each day with this bs. Do you think it takes more than a few minutes to figure out a way to construct an argument against the nchc or SCSU??? lol omg, you poor thing. I do this while binge watching Netflix. It hardly takes any effort at all, and its entertaining watching you SCSU and nchc fans flailing about, lol.

[FredsDeadFriend]

Re: Big Ten > NCHC

You do get the conferences did not exist till 4 years ago right?
As such...logic dictates that while schools can claim those...conferences can't because they did not exist. Its why schools separate their records based on the conferences they were in at the time.

You claimimg the B1G has all these titles is incorrect because they were not won while members of a B1G hockey conference.

So as I said...you twist them to fit your narrative...not factual arguments.

The B1G has always existed. *** are you talking about? You seem to think or imagine or dream or fantasize that the world revolves around college hockey????? Dude, it doesn't. College hockey is a very niche sport, that might not even exist today if not for B1G hockey programs, especially Minnesota and Michigan.

And check out B1G team's wiki pages, from 1959 until 1981, Michigan and Michigan St were in the WCHA with UW and UMn, AND Big Ten Conf Standings were kept. UW didn't even start up their hockey program until the late 50s.

Before that, UMn, Michigan and MSU were all in the WIHL and the MCHL.


See, you seem to have such a simple minded way of looking at things.



College hockey is a niche sport, or don't you realize this???




You want to separate B1G hockey programs from their past??? Well, that is because that is the ONLY way that you can match them.


Pathetic.

[First Time, Long Time]

The B1G has always existed. *** are you talking about? You seem to think or imagine or dream or fantasize that the world revolves around college hockey????? Dude, it doesn't. College hockey is a very niche sport, that might not even exist today if not for B1G hockey programs, especially Minnesota and Michigan.

And check out B1G team's wiki pages, from 1959 until 1981, Michigan and Michigan St were in the WCHA with UW and UMn, AND Big Ten Conf Standings were kept. UW didn't even start up their hockey program until the late 50s.

Before that, UMn, Michigan and MSU were all in the WIHL and the MCHL.


See, you seem to have such a simple minded way of looking at things.



College hockey is a niche sport, or don't you realize this???




You want to separate B1G hockey programs from their past??? Well, that is because that is the ONLY way that you can match them.


Pathetic.

Oh good lord. You are so **** dense you are no longer worth my time.
Fine. You win.
The b1g is THE GREATEST EVAH!!!!!!!
No one can match them and never will.
Have fun spooging with all those titles.
I quit.

[The Rube]

Re: Big Ten > NCHC

The B1G has always existed. *** are you talking about?

This is all that is needed to show what a nutcase FDF is. Moving the goalposts, to the nth degree.

[First Time, Long Time]

This is all that is needed to show what a nutcase FDF is. Moving the goalposts, to the nth degree.

Hence why I'm done.

[FredsDeadFriend]

Re: Big Ten > NCHC

I mean, think about it, the B1G was FORCED together, yet still are in a position to get 3-5 teams into the tourney right now, including the #1 team.


Meanwhile the NCHC was a conference formed out of teams who all chose to be in the conference, they were all invited. So the NCHC had the privilege of picking and choosing who was going to be in their conference. I would sure in the frack hope that they would start out as a very competitive league.


But the B1G? We were stuck with 5 programs, most of whom were struggling at the time of formation, along with a 6th program that was basically brand new.

How the frack can you try to hold such a conference under the highest scrutiny? Well, unless you are a biased nchc fan knowing it might be their only chance???


But the B1G isn't going anywhere. You should consider yourselves blessed that the B1G struggled its first few years, because it gave the nchc a chance to establish itself and possibly to compete down the road?

But that will be only if the likes of SCSU and WMU can deliver come NCAA tourney time.

[FredsDeadFriend]

Re: Big Ten > NCHC

Oh good lord. You are so **** dense you are no longer worth my time.
Fine. You win.
The b1g is THE GREATEST EVAH!!!!!!!
No one can match them and never will.
Have fun spooging with all those titles.
I quit.

About time you came to your senses. The B1G is DA SH1T!!!

[FredsDeadFriend]

Re: Big Ten > NCHC

This is all that is needed to show what a nutcase FDF is. Moving the goalposts, to the nth degree.

nutcase? Says the guy with 111,111+ posts, WOW, dude, case studies should be made about you!!!

[Tipsy McStagger]

Re: Big Ten > NCHC

nut job territory? lmao, I spend a very small amount of time each day with this bs.

If this board had a preposterous statement tournament, this would easily be a 1 seed.

[Tiggsy]

Re: Big Ten > NCHC

Yeah, even I'm getting bored reading this. But I remember getting into arguments that I was passionate about and getting attacked by all sides. Not too often on this side of the board but not too long ago over in the café. So I get the desire to keep it going, but it has to run its course at some point.