Re: Frayed Ends: Business, Economics, and Tax Policy 3.0
Tax breaks and sin taxes evolve from one thing and one thing only: Government encouraging the flow of money in certain areas. Any sort of "special interest" is entirely indirect, as you still need to show how a tax rate change benefits the economy as a whole.
One goal is to gain oil independence. How do you do that, while still fulfilling the demand for oil that exists in this country? Drill, baby, drill. How do you encourage people to do that?
Another facet of life is that a number of people judge our economy by the nominal value of the stock market. How do you encourage investment (read: investment, not day trade) there? Special rates for qualified dividends and long-term capital gains, while still realizing that many of that money is being double-whammied.
Another goal is to get people healthier by getting them to stop smoking. How do you get them to stop if you're the government? Tax the hell out of cigarettes.
You want to encourage people to live a certain way, but you don't want to give them tax breaks. You can't have your cake and eat it, too.
Originally posted by Rover
View Post
One goal is to gain oil independence. How do you do that, while still fulfilling the demand for oil that exists in this country? Drill, baby, drill. How do you encourage people to do that?
Another facet of life is that a number of people judge our economy by the nominal value of the stock market. How do you encourage investment (read: investment, not day trade) there? Special rates for qualified dividends and long-term capital gains, while still realizing that many of that money is being double-whammied.
Another goal is to get people healthier by getting them to stop smoking. How do you get them to stop if you're the government? Tax the hell out of cigarettes.
You want to encourage people to live a certain way, but you don't want to give them tax breaks. You can't have your cake and eat it, too.
Comment